DNC Demands Strict Measures to Ensure Ballot Integrity in Virtual Roll Call Vote to Nominate Harris, Yet Opposes Ballot Integrity Measures in States

[Harpy Eagle]

I voted for the candidate that has been nominated for president.

Good for you, I am so happy for you!

Democrats did not.

Are they complaining? I know a lot of Dems and they are all happy as clam about how things have turned out.

If they are not upset, why do you give a fuck?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Elections where unverified votes get dropped off at Drop Boxes and then scanned multiple times are NOT secure

Thank Odin that never happened.

not that it would matter if it did, as each ballot has its own unique barcode and you can scan it 1000 times and it will still only count as one vote.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No, man, we threw those racists out of the party in 1964, and Tricky Dick welcomed them with open arms.

Wasn't LBJ a democrat???

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Elections where unverified votes get dropped off at Drop Boxes and then scanned multiple times are NOT secure

The dNC does not allow that for their voting

Which doesn't happen. They get counted once. That's what those sig and barcode matching rules are for, snowflake.

 

[excalibur]

And, right on cue, we have Example #1..
Elections are secure. All states have their own ID laws and ballot signature matching rules.

Put forth candidates who aren't whack jobs and start peddling something besides rage, bile, hatred, division, and slavish devotion to the Orange Roughy...and you might find yourself winning elections again.

​

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Which doesn't happen. They get counted once. That's what those sig and barcode matching rules are for, snowflake.

Yep, you can scan the same ballot 1000000 times and it will only produce a single vote

 

[22lcidw]

They will have to fumigate the stadium after that convention.

 

[BluesLegend]

Democrats are the party of lies, hypocrisy and double standards. They are the lowest form of human filth.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, they selected their candidate the same way all candidate were chosen for the first 200ish years of our country's existence.

What is your point?

You want to take us back to the smoke-filled room where the cronies picked our candidates?

Why do you want to disenfranchise the people?

Have you always been a fascist?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

For most of those 200ish years there was no race, have you people no knowledge of the history of your own country.

The current primary system did not really get widely used till the 1950s, prior to that the party elites choose the candidate for the party.

And one could make a very good argument that since the current primary system was put into place the quality of candidates has dropped drastically

I suppose you want to take away the right of women and blacks to vote?

Since they got the right to vote the quality of candidates has dropped drastically.

Right? Fascist!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You want to take us back to the smoke-filled room where the cronies picked our candidates?

Why do you want to disenfranchise the people?

Have you always been a fascist?

So it was fascist that gave us George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and Abe Lincoln?

It was fascist that gave us Eisenhower and Coolidge?

I will say this, the longer the current primary system is in place the worse our candidates become.

We have not had a good candidate for POTUS from either party this current century

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So it was fascist that gave us George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and Abe Lincoln?

It was fascist that gave us Eisenhower and Coolidge?

I will say this, the longer the current primary system is in place the worse our candidates become.

We have not had a good candidate for POTUS from either party this current century

No, you're fascist.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No, you're fascist.

whatever makes you happy.

 

[scruffy]

Re-translation. In the absence of viable and sane candidates to put forth and the abject void of having nothing of policy substance to offer the average voter,
Republicans will seek to suppress the vote and whine like little bitches about fraud and cheating.

Yawn.

Same old bullcrap from the leftards.

You clowns really are retarded.

There's a reason they call you tards

 

[scruffy]

Which doesn't happen. They get counted once. That's what those sig and barcode matching rules are for, snowflake.

They have those in Venezuela too, moron.

 

[westwall]

Kansas Court Temporarily Blocks Voter Suppression Law​

Pro-voter organizations were issued a win today after a Kansas court temporarily blocked a law that sought to criminalize some voter registration activities.

House Bill 2183’s false representation provision makes it a felony for an individual to knowingly “[r]epresent oneself as an election official” or “engage in conduct that gives the appearance of being an election official.”

Voting rights groups alleged that this so-called “false representation provision” is overly vague and poses undue risks to civic organizations, which often engage in voter registration activities that overlap with actions undertaken by election officials. In May, the Kansas Supreme Court held that the law likely violates the state constitution and sent the case back down to a trial court for further proceedings.

Kansas Court Temporarily Blocks Voter Suppression Law

Read more here.

www.democracydocket.com

Why do Repubs hate it when people vote?

Thinking people hate it when illegal aliens vote in OUR elections.

Voter ID laws have no impact on voting.

Except for those who shouldn't be voting.

 

[busybee01]

Now this is rich: The same Democratic National Committee (DNC) that has screamed against perfectly reasonable GOP efforts to ensure ballot integrity in the states is imposing very strict ballot integrity measures for the upcoming Democratic virtual roll call vote of delegates to nominate Kamala Harris.

The DNC has announced that "Each roll call form has a range of security features to establish the authenticity and accuracy of each vote. Clear instructions and technical support will be provided to delegates." One of these measures will be the sending of a personalized and watermarked form to each delegate to cast their vote (LINK). This security measure alone goes beyond any measure that Republicans have proposed to ensure ballot integrity in the states.

And, mind you, the ballot integrity measures that Republicans have passed or proposed are standard election procedures in many Western nations, though you'd never know it to hear the Democrats' polemic about them.

The reason for this is because people will be voting by computer. Clearly you want cybersecurity measures in place to prevent hacking. Are you really this big of a moron or do you just play one online?

 

[busybee01]

Thinking people hate it when illegal aliens vote in OUR elections.

Voter ID laws have no impact on voting.

Except for those who shouldn't be voting.

There is absolutely no proof that illegals are voting.

 

[westwall]

There is absolutely no proof that illegals are voting.

Liar.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Thinking people hate it when illegal aliens vote in OUR elections.

Voter ID laws have no impact on voting.

Except for those who shouldn't be voting.

Undocumented immigrants are not allowed to vote in any federal, state, or city election...anywhere.
There are some districts that allow immigrants to vote in school board elections because they have children in
the system. But that's it. The only people that shouldn't be voting are right wingers who believe they vote.
These people are intelligent enough to be entrusted with the sacred privilege of voting.

The rest of the BS happens in your whack job, alt-right brain.
Each state has it's own rules for ballot counting and signature matching.
Our elections are secure.