DNC Demands Strict Measures to Ensure Ballot Integrity in Virtual Roll Call Vote to Nominate Harris, Yet Opposes Ballot Integrity Measures in States

[jotathought]

Exactly.

Democrats are a bunch of elitist pricks.

There's nothing "democratic" about them at all.

Sheeple of the kind we find on USMB are just being used.

And they're mostly too stupid to know it.

I picture many of them being in the soy boy group: White Dudes for Harris

 

[jotathought]

So, they selected their candidate the same way all candidate were chosen for the first 200ish years of our country's existence.

What is your point?

How many voters selected Harris in the recent primary and her corresponding pledged delegates? How many candidates were forced out of the race so the Democrat elite could christen their choice in the last 200ish years?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

How many voters selected Harris in the recent primary and her corresponding pledged delegates? How many candidates were forced out of the race so the Democrat elite could christen their choice in the last 200ish years?

For most of those 200ish years there was no race, have you people no knowledge of the history of your own country.

The current primary system did not really get widely used till the 1950s, prior to that the party elites choose the candidate for the party.

And one could make a very good argument that since the current primary system was put into place the quality of candidates has dropped drastically

 

[jotathought]

For most of those 200ish years there was no race, have you people no knowledge of the history of your own country.

The current primary system did not really get widely used till the 1950s, prior to that the party elites choose the candidate for the party.

And one could make a very good argument that since the current primary system was put into place the quality of candidates has dropped drastically

You didn't answer the questions.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You didn't answer the questions.

Because I do not give a flying fuck. It is irrelevant as there is no law that says there has to be any sort of voting for the nominee.

 

[jotathought]

Because I do not give a flying fuck. It is irrelevant as there is no law that says there has to be any sort of voting for the nominee.

I didn't state it was illegal .. just that the "threat to Democracy" party did it in real-time by kicking out the candidate that the people selected (with pledged delegates), and crowned a new candidate. With zero votes. I would expect this from the low-information voters who don't have any clue about "the history" you referenced and are too stupid to realize that the democrat elite told them who they were voting for.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I didn't state it was illegal .. just that the "threat to Democracy"

which is stupid considering the vast majority of our history there was no voting for candidates .

 

[jotathought]

which is stupid considering the vast majority of our history there was no voting for candidates .

That was then; this is now and really an illegitimate argument to have. Now go vote for the person you were told to vote for.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That was then; this is now and really an illegitimate argument to have. Now go vote for the person you were told to vote for.

I am voting for Chase Oliver...I am not a mindless drone like you

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Now this is rich: The same Democratic National Committee (DNC) that has screamed against perfectly reasonable GOP efforts to ensure ballot integrity in the states is imposing very strict ballot integrity measures for the upcoming Democratic virtual roll call vote of delegates to nominate Kamala Harris.

The DNC has announced that "Each roll call form has a range of security features to establish the authenticity and accuracy of each vote. Clear instructions and technical support will be provided to delegates." One of these measures will be the sending of a personalized and watermarked form to each delegate to cast their vote (LINK). This security measure alone goes beyond any measure that Republicans have proposed to ensure ballot integrity in the states.

And, mind you, the ballot integrity measures that Republicans have passed or proposed are standard election procedures in many Western nations, though you'd never know it to hear the Democrats' polemic about them.

Security for the dNC and fuck you for thee

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Now this is rich: The same Democratic National Committee (DNC) that has screamed against perfectly reasonable GOP efforts to ensure ballot integrity in the states is imposing very strict ballot integrity measures for the upcoming Democratic virtual roll call vote of delegates to nominate Kamala Harris.

The DNC has announced that "Each roll call form has a range of security features to establish the authenticity and accuracy of each vote. Clear instructions and technical support will be provided to delegates." One of these measures will be the sending of a personalized and watermarked form to each delegate to cast their vote (LINK). This security measure alone goes beyond any measure that Republicans have proposed to ensure ballot integrity in the states.

And, mind you, the ballot integrity measures that Republicans have passed or proposed are standard election procedures in many Western nations, though you'd never know it to hear the Democrats' polemic about them.

These measures are Racist!!!

 

[jotathought]

I am voting for Chase Oliver...I am not a mindless drone like you

Excellent .. one less for for Kamala.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Excellent .. one less for for Kamala.

and one less for Trump.

crazy how it works both ways.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This just. Republican (conservative) crowing about non-existent ballot integrity issues attempts to make another faux comparison.
Film at 11.

Translations: Left to their own devices without verification, democrats will cheat

 

[jotathought]

and one less for Trump.

crazy how it works both ways.

It's really negligible given Trump's lead in swing states, and I'd guess you're most likely not in one of those.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It's really negligible given Trump's lead in swing states, and I'd guess you're most likely not in one of those.

you people and your sudden love of polls.

 

[Billiejeens]

I am voting for Chase Oliver...I am not a mindless drone like you

He is a great candidate.

 

[jotathought]

you people and your sudden love of polls.

Okay .. so I was right. Any state outside of the swing states are meaningless in an election year. Democrats aren't going to win Texas or Florida, and Republicans aren't going to win California and New York. It's pretty simple.

 

[westwall]

It is rather sad how little actual knowledge most Americans have of the history of our country

No, what's sad is how a little Marxist, like you, thinks you can lie to the electorate.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Any state outside of the swing states are meaningless in an election year.

yes, it is that way every year. one of the major flaws in our system. But it keeps the same people in power so it will never be addressed.

Democrats aren't going to win Texas or Florida, and Republicans aren't going to win California and New York. It's pretty simple.

Texas is getting closer each year. GA had not gone for the Dems since 1992, so these things do change over time.

But yeah, right now in my state, Il, a vote for anyone but Harris is wasted. People mock me for voting for Chase Oliver but his chances to win the state are not any worse than Trump's