easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,190
- 2,645
CLAIM:
'Robert Johnston dealt directly with the FBI as an investigator of the DNC hack for CrowdStrike, a leading cyber security company hired by the Democrats. He told us the FBI didnât physically examine the DNC servers because CrowdStrike gave the bureau copies of the data from the servers.
âIf there is a server or a computer system of any kind thatâs involved in the incident you can take an exact bit for bit digital copy of whatâs on that system. Now that digital copy is just as good as having the real thing,â
"A former senior government official, familiar with the investigation, told us the FBI would have preferred to work alongside CrowdStrikeâs investigators, but the Democratic National Committee decided to give the bureau digital copies of its servers instead. The official told us this was âacceptable,â in fact even typical in FBI investigations."
SINCE WHEN DOES THE DNC GIVE THE FBI ORDERS / DENYTHE FBI THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INVESTIGATING MATTERS OF NATIONALSECURITY & OUTSOURCES THAT JOB TO A COMPANY TIED TO THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN (HUGE DONATIONS)?
-- The fact tha the DNC paid Crowdstrike over $600k & Obama gave the CEO/founder of the company a position in his administration after 'services rendered' is not fishy at all.
1. Internal sources say the server was never hacked.
2. CrowdStrike gave the US government three âdraft reportsâ of their 'investigation' on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the un-redacted copies of Crowdstrikeâs reports
3. Former NSA whistleblower Bill Binney previously reported he has evidence the DNC emails were not hacked but copied most likely on to a flashdrive or something similar.
- (Can you say 'AYWAN'?)
4. Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum says the 60 Minutes and Crowdstrike claims are completely false:
"If Crowdstrike gave the FBI any data it was drive images (we donât even know which ones). This did not include memory dumps, network pocket captures, firewall activity, etc. This additional data is crucial and should have been examined in real-time by the FBI. If indeed any drive images were given to the FBI, these would have been contaminated because they continued to use these drives for weeks after the alleged hack."
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Crowdstrike and Their PR Firm Now Distance Themselves from Russia's Link to Wikileaks -- HUGE DEVELOPMENT
'Robert Johnston dealt directly with the FBI as an investigator of the DNC hack for CrowdStrike, a leading cyber security company hired by the Democrats. He told us the FBI didnât physically examine the DNC servers because CrowdStrike gave the bureau copies of the data from the servers.
âIf there is a server or a computer system of any kind thatâs involved in the incident you can take an exact bit for bit digital copy of whatâs on that system. Now that digital copy is just as good as having the real thing,â
"A former senior government official, familiar with the investigation, told us the FBI would have preferred to work alongside CrowdStrikeâs investigators, but the Democratic National Committee decided to give the bureau digital copies of its servers instead. The official told us this was âacceptable,â in fact even typical in FBI investigations."
SINCE WHEN DOES THE DNC GIVE THE FBI ORDERS / DENYTHE FBI THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INVESTIGATING MATTERS OF NATIONALSECURITY & OUTSOURCES THAT JOB TO A COMPANY TIED TO THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN (HUGE DONATIONS)?
-- The fact tha the DNC paid Crowdstrike over $600k & Obama gave the CEO/founder of the company a position in his administration after 'services rendered' is not fishy at all.
1. Internal sources say the server was never hacked.
2. CrowdStrike gave the US government three âdraft reportsâ of their 'investigation' on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the un-redacted copies of Crowdstrikeâs reports
3. Former NSA whistleblower Bill Binney previously reported he has evidence the DNC emails were not hacked but copied most likely on to a flashdrive or something similar.
- (Can you say 'AYWAN'?)
4. Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum says the 60 Minutes and Crowdstrike claims are completely false:
"If Crowdstrike gave the FBI any data it was drive images (we donât even know which ones). This did not include memory dumps, network pocket captures, firewall activity, etc. This additional data is crucial and should have been examined in real-time by the FBI. If indeed any drive images were given to the FBI, these would have been contaminated because they continued to use these drives for weeks after the alleged hack."
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Crowdstrike and Their PR Firm Now Distance Themselves from Russia's Link to Wikileaks -- HUGE DEVELOPMENT