Did You Believe That “Diversity Is Our Strength”?

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
131,874
Reaction score
67,668
Points
2,615
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Of course it isn’t….unity is our strength.
It's just one more Democrat lie.


Whether it is the Communist Mamdani win in NYC, or the take-over by the Marxists of the Democrat Party, bringing in hordes of non-assimilating immigrants warrants the end of America.

We have seen it throughout history.

Victor Davis Hanson:
1.“I taught courses on political philosophy, I'd always spend time on Aristotle's concept of citizenship. He argued that citizens need something in common, some shared understanding of justice, of the good life, of what the political community is for. Without that common understanding, you don't have a political community. You just have different groups living in the same place, competing for resources and power. America used to be a city in Aristotle sense. Now it's becoming an alliance and alliances are fragile. They break apart when interests diverge. That's what's developing in America right now ….…understand that this pattern is playing out in cities across America. It's not just Minnesota. Look at Dearbornne, Michigan. Look at parts of California. Look at any place with large immigrant populations where politicians are rising to power based purely on ethnic identity.


2. Let me tell you one more historical example and then I'll explain why this matters. ....Carthage was a multithnic empire, Phoenician Corps, but they recruited soldiers from all over the Mediterranean. Numidians, Iberians, Gauls, whoever would fight for money. And it worked for a while. Carthage built an empire with mercenary armies.They conquered territory. They controlled trade routes. They became wealthy and powerful. But here's what happened. When Carthage got in real trouble, when they were fighting for survival against Rome in the Punic Wars, those mercenary armies weren't reliable. They had no loyalty to Carthage. They were fighting for money, not for civilization. And when the money ran out or when Rome offered them a better deal, they switched sides or went home or just stopped fighting. There's a famous incident after the first Punic War. Carthage couldn't pay its mercenaries. The soldiers mutinied. They besieged Carthage itself. The city that had hired them to fight its enemies nearly fell to its own army because there was no loyalty, no shared identity. No reason for those soldiers to suffer hardship for Carthage's sake.
Rome, meanwhile, had citizen soldiers, men who saw themselves as Romans first, who had a stake in Rome's survival, who fought harder because they were defending their own civilization, their own families, their own way of life. When Roman legions lost a battle, they regrouped and fought again. When they ran out of money, they fought anyway. When the situation looked hopeless, they kept fighting. Not because they were better warriors, but because they had something Carthaginian mercenaries didn't have, identity, loyalty, commitment to something larger than themselves. That's why Rome won the Punic Wars. That's why Rome conquered the Mediterranean while Carthage was destroyed so completely that the Romans literally salted the earth so nothing would grow there. The difference wasn't tactics or technology.The difference was identity. Now apply that lesson to America in 2025. You have politicians who see themselves as representatives of specific ethnic or religious communities. their loyalty is to that community, not to America as a whole. And you have voters who are starting to notice, starting to ask questions, starting to wonder if maybe there's a problem with this arrangement.


3. That's what's happening with (Ilhan)Omar. That's why Republicans are calling for her deportation. Not because they actually think she's going to be deported, but because they're making a point. They're saying out loud what a lot of people are thinking quietly. If you're more loyal to Somalia than to America, why are you in Congress? That question is being asked and it's not going away. The interesting thing is that Republicans used to be scared to ask that question. They'd be called racist, xenophobic, islamophobic, all the usual accusations.



4. But something's changed. They're asking the question anyway, and voters are listening because voters have figured something out. They figured out that accusations of racism don't actually answer the underlying question. Does this person represent America or does she represent Somalia? That's a legitimate question. And calling people racist for asking it doesn't make the question disappear.


5. Other politicians who built their careers on identity politics will face the same trajectory because America is waking up to the fact that identity politics doesn't work. It creates division. It prevents assimilation. It makes governance impossible.”



Happy Thanksgiving to those who love America.
 
Of course it isn’t….unity is our strength.
It's just one more Democrat lie.


Whether it is the Communist Mamdani win in NYC, or the take-over by the Marxists of the Democrat Party, bringing in hordes of non-assimilating immigrants warrants the end of America.

We have seen it throughout history.

Victor Davis Hanson:
1.“I taught courses on political philosophy, I'd always spend time on Aristotle's concept of citizenship. He argued that citizens need something in common, some shared understanding of justice, of the good life, of what the political community is for. Without that common understanding, you don't have a political community. You just have different groups living in the same place, competing for resources and power. America used to be a city in Aristotle sense. Now it's becoming an alliance and alliances are fragile. They break apart when interests diverge. That's what's developing in America right now ….…understand that this pattern is playing out in cities across America. It's not just Minnesota. Look at Dearbornne, Michigan. Look at parts of California. Look at any place with large immigrant populations where politicians are rising to power based purely on ethnic identity.


2. Let me tell you one more historical example and then I'll explain why this matters. ....Carthage was a multithnic empire, Phoenician Corps, but they recruited soldiers from all over the Mediterranean. Numidians, Iberians, Gauls, whoever would fight for money. And it worked for a while. Carthage built an empire with mercenary armies.They conquered territory. They controlled trade routes. They became wealthy and powerful. But here's what happened. When Carthage got in real trouble, when they were fighting for survival against Rome in the Punic Wars, those mercenary armies weren't reliable. They had no loyalty to Carthage. They were fighting for money, not for civilization. And when the money ran out or when Rome offered them a better deal, they switched sides or went home or just stopped fighting. There's a famous incident after the first Punic War. Carthage couldn't pay its mercenaries. The soldiers mutinied. They besieged Carthage itself. The city that had hired them to fight its enemies nearly fell to its own army because there was no loyalty, no shared identity. No reason for those soldiers to suffer hardship for Carthage's sake.
Rome, meanwhile, had citizen soldiers, men who saw themselves as Romans first, who had a stake in Rome's survival, who fought harder because they were defending their own civilization, their own families, their own way of life. When Roman legions lost a battle, they regrouped and fought again. When they ran out of money, they fought anyway. When the situation looked hopeless, they kept fighting. Not because they were better warriors, but because they had something Carthaginian mercenaries didn't have, identity, loyalty, commitment to something larger than themselves. That's why Rome won the Punic Wars. That's why Rome conquered the Mediterranean while Carthage was destroyed so completely that the Romans literally salted the earth so nothing would grow there. The difference wasn't tactics or technology.The difference was identity. Now apply that lesson to America in 2025. You have politicians who see themselves as representatives of specific ethnic or religious communities. their loyalty is to that community, not to America as a whole. And you have voters who are starting to notice, starting to ask questions, starting to wonder if maybe there's a problem with this arrangement.


3. That's what's happening with (Ilhan)Omar. That's why Republicans are calling for her deportation. Not because they actually think she's going to be deported, but because they're making a point. They're saying out loud what a lot of people are thinking quietly. If you're more loyal to Somalia than to America, why are you in Congress? That question is being asked and it's not going away. The interesting thing is that Republicans used to be scared to ask that question. They'd be called racist, xenophobic, islamophobic, all the usual accusations.



4. But something's changed. They're asking the question anyway, and voters are listening because voters have figured something out. They figured out that accusations of racism don't actually answer the underlying question. Does this person represent America or does she represent Somalia? That's a legitimate question. And calling people racist for asking it doesn't make the question disappear.


5. Other politicians who built their careers on identity politics will face the same trajectory because America is waking up to the fact that identity politics doesn't work. It creates division. It prevents assimilation. It makes governance impossible.”



Happy Thanksgiving to those who love America.

.

And Happy Thanksgiving to you as well!

.
 
Name the institutions in our society that get better with "diversity."

Provided relevant standards are maintained, I would include police, Academe, social work, the Armed Forces, retail trade, medicine, and customer service.

But when standards are abandoned, diversity is insidious, harming everything it touches.

Unity is the most powerful strength, even among people who are demographically diverse. To illustrate, in the combat arms, there is only one color: Green.
 
Of course it isn’t….unity is our strength.
It's just one more Democrat lie.


Whether it is the Communist Mamdani win in NYC, or the take-over by the Marxists of the Democrat Party, bringing in hordes of non-assimilating immigrants warrants the end of America.

We have seen it throughout history.

Victor Davis Hanson:
1.“I taught courses on political philosophy, I'd always spend time on Aristotle's concept of citizenship. He argued that citizens need something in common, some shared understanding of justice, of the good life, of what the political community is for. Without that common understanding, you don't have a political community. You just have different groups living in the same place, competing for resources and power. America used to be a city in Aristotle sense. Now it's becoming an alliance and alliances are fragile. They break apart when interests diverge. That's what's developing in America right now ….…understand that this pattern is playing out in cities across America. It's not just Minnesota. Look at Dearbornne, Michigan. Look at parts of California. Look at any place with large immigrant populations where politicians are rising to power based purely on ethnic identity.


2. Let me tell you one more historical example and then I'll explain why this matters. ....Carthage was a multithnic empire, Phoenician Corps, but they recruited soldiers from all over the Mediterranean. Numidians, Iberians, Gauls, whoever would fight for money. And it worked for a while. Carthage built an empire with mercenary armies.They conquered territory. They controlled trade routes. They became wealthy and powerful. But here's what happened. When Carthage got in real trouble, when they were fighting for survival against Rome in the Punic Wars, those mercenary armies weren't reliable. They had no loyalty to Carthage. They were fighting for money, not for civilization. And when the money ran out or when Rome offered them a better deal, they switched sides or went home or just stopped fighting. There's a famous incident after the first Punic War. Carthage couldn't pay its mercenaries. The soldiers mutinied. They besieged Carthage itself. The city that had hired them to fight its enemies nearly fell to its own army because there was no loyalty, no shared identity. No reason for those soldiers to suffer hardship for Carthage's sake.
Rome, meanwhile, had citizen soldiers, men who saw themselves as Romans first, who had a stake in Rome's survival, who fought harder because they were defending their own civilization, their own families, their own way of life. When Roman legions lost a battle, they regrouped and fought again. When they ran out of money, they fought anyway. When the situation looked hopeless, they kept fighting. Not because they were better warriors, but because they had something Carthaginian mercenaries didn't have, identity, loyalty, commitment to something larger than themselves. That's why Rome won the Punic Wars. That's why Rome conquered the Mediterranean while Carthage was destroyed so completely that the Romans literally salted the earth so nothing would grow there. The difference wasn't tactics or technology.The difference was identity. Now apply that lesson to America in 2025. You have politicians who see themselves as representatives of specific ethnic or religious communities. their loyalty is to that community, not to America as a whole. And you have voters who are starting to notice, starting to ask questions, starting to wonder if maybe there's a problem with this arrangement.


3. That's what's happening with (Ilhan)Omar. That's why Republicans are calling for her deportation. Not because they actually think she's going to be deported, but because they're making a point. They're saying out loud what a lot of people are thinking quietly. If you're more loyal to Somalia than to America, why are you in Congress? That question is being asked and it's not going away. The interesting thing is that Republicans used to be scared to ask that question. They'd be called racist, xenophobic, islamophobic, all the usual accusations.



4. But something's changed. They're asking the question anyway, and voters are listening because voters have figured something out. They figured out that accusations of racism don't actually answer the underlying question. Does this person represent America or does she represent Somalia? That's a legitimate question. And calling people racist for asking it doesn't make the question disappear.


5. Other politicians who built their careers on identity politics will face the same trajectory because America is waking up to the fact that identity politics doesn't work. It creates division. It prevents assimilation. It makes governance impossible.”



Happy Thanksgiving to those who love America.



Unity is our strength. E Pluribus Unum. If you don't believe it, leave.
 
Name the institutions in our society that get better with "diversity."

Provided relevant standards are maintained, I would include police, Academe, social work, the Armed Forces, retail trade, medicine, and customer service.

But when standards are abandoned, diversity is insidious, harming everything it touches.

Unity is the most powerful strength, even among people who are demographically diverse. To illustrate, in the combat arms, there is only one color: Green.
You'd benefit from post #5
 
Diversity can be a strength because multiple options and ideas can lead to the best choice among a bunch of choices. You don't want group think IOW. But - these days there's a large chasm between repubs and dems, and those who would crossover are ostracized. I'm not sure the problem is diversity, but rather the refusal to cooperate and compromise. IOW, we have too many extremists and not enough moderates in both parties that are willing to arrive at some sort of consensus. I think diversity can work with enough reasonable people involved.
 
Of course it isn’t….unity is our strength.
It's just one more Democrat lie.

Whether it is the Communist Mamdani win in NYC, or the take-over by the Marxists of the Democrat Party, bringing in hordes of non-assimilating immigrants warrants the end of America.

We have seen it throughout history.
Actually, history tells us just the opposite. Most every group that has immigrated to the US has followed the same general pattern. The first generation settles in a community composed mainly of that group. They live and work in that bubble and many never learn English. The children are bilingual and have a foot in both the immigrant and American culture. The 3rd generation is mainly American and speaks English as their primary language. I grew up in NYC and saw this pattern every day.

The OP suggests a crystal ball they do not have as predicting any immigrant group will be non-assimilating is purely a guess.

Happy Thanksgiving to those who love America.
Those who love American know it is what it is because of the historically, wildly-diverse, immigrant population.
 
Diversity can be a strength because multiple options and ideas can lead to the best choice among a bunch of choices. You don't want group think IOW. But - these days there's a large chasm between repubs and dems, and those who would crossover are ostracized. I'm not sure the problem is diversity, but rather the refusal to cooperate and compromise. IOW, we have too many extremists and not enough moderates in both parties that are willing to arrive at some sort of consensus. I think diversity can work with enough reasonable people involved.
This has nothing to do with ideas.

Which part of the law of the land, the US Constitution, suggests selecting folks based on skin color, language, ethnicity, or religion?

Did I miss it?
 
Actually, history tells us just the opposite. Most every group that has immigrated to the US has followed the same general pattern. The first generation settles in a community composed mainly of that group. They live and work in that bubble and many never learn English. The children are bilingual and have a foot in both the immigrant and American culture. The 3rd generation is mainly American and speaks English as their primary language. I grew up in NYC and saw this pattern every day.

The OP suggests a crystal ball they do not have as predicting any immigrant group will be non-assimilating is purely a guess.


Those who love American know it is what it is because of the historically, wildly-diverse, immigrant population.

Get lost Herman the Vermin......or at least stand downwind.
 
Of course it isn’t….unity is our strength.
It's just one more Democrat lie.


Whether it is the Communist Mamdani win in NYC, or the take-over by the Marxists of the Democrat Party, bringing in hordes of non-assimilating immigrants warrants the end of America.

We have seen it throughout history.

Victor Davis Hanson:
1.“I taught courses on political philosophy, I'd always spend time on Aristotle's concept of citizenship. He argued that citizens need something in common, some shared understanding of justice, of the good life, of what the political community is for. Without that common understanding, you don't have a political community. You just have different groups living in the same place, competing for resources and power. America used to be a city in Aristotle sense. Now it's becoming an alliance and alliances are fragile. They break apart when interests diverge. That's what's developing in America right now ….…understand that this pattern is playing out in cities across America. It's not just Minnesota. Look at Dearbornne, Michigan. Look at parts of California. Look at any place with large immigrant populations where politicians are rising to power based purely on ethnic identity.


2. Let me tell you one more historical example and then I'll explain why this matters. ....Carthage was a multithnic empire, Phoenician Corps, but they recruited soldiers from all over the Mediterranean. Numidians, Iberians, Gauls, whoever would fight for money. And it worked for a while. Carthage built an empire with mercenary armies.They conquered territory. They controlled trade routes. They became wealthy and powerful. But here's what happened. When Carthage got in real trouble, when they were fighting for survival against Rome in the Punic Wars, those mercenary armies weren't reliable. They had no loyalty to Carthage. They were fighting for money, not for civilization. And when the money ran out or when Rome offered them a better deal, they switched sides or went home or just stopped fighting. There's a famous incident after the first Punic War. Carthage couldn't pay its mercenaries. The soldiers mutinied. They besieged Carthage itself. The city that had hired them to fight its enemies nearly fell to its own army because there was no loyalty, no shared identity. No reason for those soldiers to suffer hardship for Carthage's sake.
Rome, meanwhile, had citizen soldiers, men who saw themselves as Romans first, who had a stake in Rome's survival, who fought harder because they were defending their own civilization, their own families, their own way of life. When Roman legions lost a battle, they regrouped and fought again. When they ran out of money, they fought anyway. When the situation looked hopeless, they kept fighting. Not because they were better warriors, but because they had something Carthaginian mercenaries didn't have, identity, loyalty, commitment to something larger than themselves. That's why Rome won the Punic Wars. That's why Rome conquered the Mediterranean while Carthage was destroyed so completely that the Romans literally salted the earth so nothing would grow there. The difference wasn't tactics or technology.The difference was identity. Now apply that lesson to America in 2025. You have politicians who see themselves as representatives of specific ethnic or religious communities. their loyalty is to that community, not to America as a whole. And you have voters who are starting to notice, starting to ask questions, starting to wonder if maybe there's a problem with this arrangement.


3. That's what's happening with (Ilhan)Omar. That's why Republicans are calling for her deportation. Not because they actually think she's going to be deported, but because they're making a point. They're saying out loud what a lot of people are thinking quietly. If you're more loyal to Somalia than to America, why are you in Congress? That question is being asked and it's not going away. The interesting thing is that Republicans used to be scared to ask that question. They'd be called racist, xenophobic, islamophobic, all the usual accusations.



4. But something's changed. They're asking the question anyway, and voters are listening because voters have figured something out. They figured out that accusations of racism don't actually answer the underlying question. Does this person represent America or does she represent Somalia? That's a legitimate question. And calling people racist for asking it doesn't make the question disappear.


5. Other politicians who built their careers on identity politics will face the same trajectory because America is waking up to the fact that identity politics doesn't work. It creates division. It prevents assimilation. It makes governance impossible.”



Happy Thanksgiving to those who love America.


Depends, but generally no.

beauty personified 2025.webp
 
Depends, but generally no.

View attachment 1188237
It seems the subject requires this clarification: no right thinking individual objects to diversity of opinion.....of course Democrats object- look at the make-up of college professorships.....

The diversity question revolves around hiring, selecting individuals to fill some skin color, religion, sexual orientation quotas.

D:R Ratios by Field

Figure 1 illustrates the sharp differences across the departments or fields in the liberal arts colleges. The D:R ratios range from 1.6:1 for engineering to 56:0 and 108:0 for communications and interdisciplinary studies.

1764273547599.webp

 
This has nothing to do with ideas.

Which part of the law of the land, the US Constitution, suggests selecting folks based on skin color, language, ethnicity, or religion?

Did I miss it?
What part of the Constitution says anything about selecting anyone for any reason? Do you not understand, you are the one that wants to do the selecting. With open borders, well the "free market" controls immigration. But you want to control the borders, you want the government to be able to pick and choose it's citizens, something I can promise you, the founders would have been horrified at the idea.

I mean what kind of warped sense of history do you have? Do you have any idea just how diverse the colonists were? Do you really believe they all "assimilated" together. It is comical. I mean come on. Diversity, history, well yeah, we settled that question. It was called WWII. Not like WWI didn't give them fair warning.

Those soldiers that showed up in WWI. They averaged six inches taller than their European counterparts The abundance of food helped, but diversity was the driver. I mean come on, purebred dogs have a much shorter life expectancy than mongrels. And no unit spent more time on the front lines, no unit lost more men, 1,500 casualties, and they were the first unit to cross the Rhine river into Germany. The "Black Rattlers", 369th infantry, the Harlem Hell fighters.

This very nation was built on diversity. And it has been messy sometimes. But the greater the diversity, the stronger the unity, when the unity is needed.
 
15th post
Of course it isn’t….unity is our strength.
It's just one more Democrat lie.


Whether it is the Communist Mamdani win in NYC, or the take-over by the Marxists of the Democrat Party, bringing in hordes of non-assimilating immigrants warrants the end of America.

We have seen it throughout history.

Victor Davis Hanson:
1.“I taught courses on political philosophy, I'd always spend time on Aristotle's concept of citizenship. He argued that citizens need something in common, some shared understanding of justice, of the good life, of what the political community is for. Without that common understanding, you don't have a political community. You just have different groups living in the same place, competing for resources and power. America used to be a city in Aristotle sense. Now it's becoming an alliance and alliances are fragile. They break apart when interests diverge. That's what's developing in America right now ….…understand that this pattern is playing out in cities across America. It's not just Minnesota. Look at Dearbornne, Michigan. Look at parts of California. Look at any place with large immigrant populations where politicians are rising to power based purely on ethnic identity.


2. Let me tell you one more historical example and then I'll explain why this matters. ....Carthage was a multithnic empire, Phoenician Corps, but they recruited soldiers from all over the Mediterranean. Numidians, Iberians, Gauls, whoever would fight for money. And it worked for a while. Carthage built an empire with mercenary armies.They conquered territory. They controlled trade routes. They became wealthy and powerful. But here's what happened. When Carthage got in real trouble, when they were fighting for survival against Rome in the Punic Wars, those mercenary armies weren't reliable. They had no loyalty to Carthage. They were fighting for money, not for civilization. And when the money ran out or when Rome offered them a better deal, they switched sides or went home or just stopped fighting. There's a famous incident after the first Punic War. Carthage couldn't pay its mercenaries. The soldiers mutinied. They besieged Carthage itself. The city that had hired them to fight its enemies nearly fell to its own army because there was no loyalty, no shared identity. No reason for those soldiers to suffer hardship for Carthage's sake.
Rome, meanwhile, had citizen soldiers, men who saw themselves as Romans first, who had a stake in Rome's survival, who fought harder because they were defending their own civilization, their own families, their own way of life. When Roman legions lost a battle, they regrouped and fought again. When they ran out of money, they fought anyway. When the situation looked hopeless, they kept fighting. Not because they were better warriors, but because they had something Carthaginian mercenaries didn't have, identity, loyalty, commitment to something larger than themselves. That's why Rome won the Punic Wars. That's why Rome conquered the Mediterranean while Carthage was destroyed so completely that the Romans literally salted the earth so nothing would grow there. The difference wasn't tactics or technology.The difference was identity. Now apply that lesson to America in 2025. You have politicians who see themselves as representatives of specific ethnic or religious communities. their loyalty is to that community, not to America as a whole. And you have voters who are starting to notice, starting to ask questions, starting to wonder if maybe there's a problem with this arrangement.


3. That's what's happening with (Ilhan)Omar. That's why Republicans are calling for her deportation. Not because they actually think she's going to be deported, but because they're making a point. They're saying out loud what a lot of people are thinking quietly. If you're more loyal to Somalia than to America, why are you in Congress? That question is being asked and it's not going away. The interesting thing is that Republicans used to be scared to ask that question. They'd be called racist, xenophobic, islamophobic, all the usual accusations.



4. But something's changed. They're asking the question anyway, and voters are listening because voters have figured something out. They figured out that accusations of racism don't actually answer the underlying question. Does this person represent America or does she represent Somalia? That's a legitimate question. And calling people racist for asking it doesn't make the question disappear.


5. Other politicians who built their careers on identity politics will face the same trajectory because America is waking up to the fact that identity politics doesn't work. It creates division. It prevents assimilation. It makes governance impossible.”



Happy Thanksgiving to those who love America.

Did You Believe That “Diversity Is Our Strength”? Diversity is a strength. Evolution = not survival of the fittest, but survival of ones that most easily adapt. That comes with diversity​

 
What part of the Constitution says anything about selecting anyone for any reason? Do you not understand, you are the one that wants to do the selecting. With open borders, well the "free market" controls immigration. But you want to control the borders, you want the government to be able to pick and choose it's citizens, something I can promise you, the founders would have been horrified at the idea.

I mean what kind of warped sense of history do you have? Do you have any idea just how diverse the colonists were? Do you really believe they all "assimilated" together. It is comical. I mean come on. Diversity, history, well yeah, we settled that question. It was called WWII. Not like WWI didn't give them fair warning.

Those soldiers that showed up in WWI. They averaged six inches taller than their European counterparts The abundance of food helped, but diversity was the driver. I mean come on, purebred dogs have a much shorter life expectancy than mongrels. And no unit spent more time on the front lines, no unit lost more men, 1,500 casualties, and they were the first unit to cross the Rhine river into Germany. The "Black Rattlers", 369th infantry, the Harlem Hell fighters.

This very nation was built on diversity. And it has been messy sometimes. But the greater the diversity, the stronger the unity, when the unity is needed.

Did you write this, scum?

"Asian is not white, GTFO."

Forsyth And Trump's Travel Ban post #2
 
Actually, history tells us just the opposite. Most every group that has immigrated to the US has followed the same general pattern. The first generation settles in a community composed mainly of that group. They live and work in that bubble and many never learn English. The children are bilingual and have a foot in both the immigrant and American culture. The 3rd generation is mainly American and speaks English as their primary language. I grew up in NYC and saw this pattern every day.

The OP suggests a crystal ball they do not have as predicting any immigrant group will be non-assimilating is purely a guess.


Those who love American know it is what it is because of the historically, wildly-diverse, immigrant population.
You are confusing multiculturism with assimilation. You know, like Brit-born Paki child groomers in the UK.
 
Back
Top Bottom