The recent case was NOT about what supposedly happened in that department store fitting room. The statute of limitations had expired long ago on that matter, and the accuser could not have filed a lawsuit for any sort of assault.
The Leftist cabal of lawyers attacking Trump needed something recent on which to base their case, so they latched onto slander because Trump in one way or another called her a liar. This, like ALL of the cases against Trump in this election season is UNPRECEDENTED. No other case has ever been brought against someone for DEFENDING HIMSELF against an accusation like this. In fact, it is preposterous.
The case was brought in the specific locale where Trump got one of his lowest vote totals in the two elections, excepting only places like Philadelphia, where certain precincts vote 100% for the Democrat, regardless of who it is. The judge is a Leftist whore, known before he got the case and confirmed during the trial.
The accuser could not even specify THE YEAR in which the assault supposedly took place, which is even more conspicuous than it seems. Donald Trump, long a victim of baseless accusations of all sorts of adventures, keeps a detailed journal of his whereabouts and activities at all time. Taking away the TIME element - which is a legal absurdity - PREVENTS Trump from mounting a defense to this accusation, which has no actual corroboration. Further, the accusation itself does not pass the Laugh Test. How [the fuck] could this assault have occurred in a department store fitting room? There are attendants at fitting rooms, and the more posh the venue the more certain it is that the fitting room is attended by staff. And yet she claims that a fully-clothed Donald Trump got into the fitting room and nobody noticed or accosted him. As I say, it doesn't pass the Laugh Test.
There is no rational basis to conclude that any assault took place, let alone a rape. And the jury DID NOT conclude that Trump raped this woman; the judge simply lied.