Did The CIA Help Plan 911?

[MayorQuimby]

Really ??

The most heavily populated city on earth and you think millions of them would not start filinmg that day???

Largest city on earth and you think only person would reasonably be expected to start filming?

You are a special kind of stupid

I see that SoupBowl is having trouble with rational inquiries again.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I see that SoupBowl is having trouble with rational inquiries again.

You did not makea rational inquiry

You assumed that only one person would turn on a camera in gthe worlds largest city

That is idiotic inquiry

 

[MayorQuimby]

You did not makea rational inquiry

You assumed that only one person would turn on a camera in gthe worlds largest city

That is idiotic inquiry

I see that SoupBowl cannot read, either.

I did not say that only person would turn on a camera. I said that it is highly unlikely that there would be multiple people who all happened to turn on their cameras, on a totally random day, where up until that point, nothing was happening. This is highly suspicious, it is no hard proof of anything, but it should make anyone with half a brain really think.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I see that SoupBowl cannot read, either.

I did not say that only person would turn on a camera. I said that it is highly unlikely that there would be multiple people who all happened to turn on their cameras, on a totally random day, where up until that point, nothing was happening. This is highly suspicious, it is no hard proof of anything, but it should make anyone with half a brain really think.

You said you could understand one video of it happening but not multiple videos

Which means you stupidly think it is unlikely for many people in the worlds largest city to film a catastrophic event'

That is idioitc

It was not a random day

It is is not suspicious it is beyond moronic to even think every one would NOT grab their cameras and start filming you simpleton

 

[MayorQuimby]

You said you could understand one video of it happening but not multiple videos

Which means you stupidly think it is unlikely for many people in the worlds largest city to film a catastrophic event'

That is idioitc

It was not a random day

It is is not suspicious it is beyond moronic to even think every one would NOT grab their cameras and start filming you simpleton

God I cannot believe what a ******* retard you are.

Did you see the words, "up until that point"???? Yes it was a catastrophic event, however, at the time when all those people were whipping out their cameras, there was no event yet. So how come they were all ready with their cameras? The only conclusion to be drawn is that they knew something was about to happen.

God you ******* retard.

 

[Soupnazi630]

God I cannot believe what a ******* retard you are.

Did you see the words, "up until that point"???? Yes it was a catastrophic event, however, at the time when all those people were whipping out their cameras, there was no event yet. So how come they were all ready with their cameras? The only conclusion to be drawn is that they knew something was about to happen.

God you ******* retard.

Because there were TWO impacts you ignorant schmuck


there are relatively few videos of the first impact although there would naturally be more than one because a city that size the towers were an iconic object to view.

tThe instant the first one hit everyone began looking at BOTH with camers and most video is of the SECOND impact

Watch what you say BOY you are truly the only stupid one here and massively out of your league

 

[MayorQuimby]

Because there were TWO impacts you ignorant schmuck


there are relatively few videos of the first impact although there would naturally be more than one because a city that size the towers were an iconic object to view.

tThe instant the first one hit everyone began looking at BOTH with camers and most video is of the SECOND impact

Watch what you say BOY you are truly the only stupid one here and massively out of your league

Indeed I wasn't aware that there was a second crash, however, the gist of what I said is still true. Besides, it is still very strange that so many people just happened to have a camera around. I don't know about you, but when I go outside, I don't carry a camera with me. And this happened 20 years ago, when there weren't smart-phones yet that could easily serve as a camera.

Furthermore, it's not even about whether what I said is true or not. Rather, it's more about the reaction of people like you. It just seems that you are really, really, really invested in the official narrative being true, and anytime someone puts forth an alternative explanation, you act like your mother's honor is being questioned and you must defend it. It's a really, really strange thing.

Thirdly, I actually haven't viewed the footage myself, but if I were to guess, the footage capturing people falling to their deaths, was taken from as many angles as possible, to give people the perfect visual. Is this correct? Also, I bet that the footage was also of almost professional quality. This is so that people could see very very clearly how people were being forced to jump to their deaths. Again, if this is true, then it should raise a red flag. Footage taken by regular people is often of poor quality.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Indeed I wasn't aware that there was a second crash, however, the gist of what I said is still true. Besides, it is still very strange that so many people just happened to have a camera around. I don't know about you, but when I go outside, I don't carry a camera with me. And this happened 20 years ago, when there weren't smart-phones yet that could easily serve as a camera.

Furthermore, it's not even about whether what I said is true or not. Rather, it's more about the reaction of people like you. It just seems that you are really, really, really invested in the official narrative being true, and anytime someone puts forth an alternative explanation, you act like your mother's honor is being questioned and you must defend it. It's a really, really strange thing.

Thirdly, I actually haven't viewed the footage myself, but if I were to guess, the footage capturing people falling to their deaths, was taken from as many angles as possible, to give people the perfect visual. Is this correct? Also, I bet that the footage was also of almost professional quality. This is so that people could see very very clearly how people were being forced to jump to their deaths. Again, if this is true, then it should raise a red flag. Footage taken by regular people is often of poor quality.

No it is not strange. New York is an enormous tourist destination and the towers were tourist attractions.

It would be more suspicious if hundreds of people had NOT been walking around with cameras gawking and video taping the towers at any given times. Small cam corders did exist and toursist routinely used them.

Not to mention documentary film makers who are ALWAYS hanging around New york filming one thing or another it is not unsual that alll began to point the camers in a different direction as things started to happpen.

There were tens of thousands of people filming so of course out of all that some perfectly iconic imagery exists.

You are making a dessperate attempt to find suspicion when there is none.

Once again try and grasp the biggest city on earth with the greatest concentration of people and tourists and film crews ALL the time

Not one reason to be suspicious and only a drooling fool like you would shit their pants insisting it is unsual

 

[MayorQuimby]

When you explain it like that, indeed it sounds like it makes sense. However, I am being suspicious, not because I think I am right, but rather, because I think it's good to always have a healthy amount of suspicion. Especially when it comes to dealing with the government and their official narratives. I am not being unreasonably suspicious; rather, the government and its track-record of lying, deception, cover-ups...etc etc have severely shaken my faith in them and their integrity. This is even more so when it comes to an organization like the CIA, who has a very, very unsavory reputation. Their reputation is so insanely bad, to the point that anything they ever say, I will believe the complete opposite of it. Again, you will probably try and blame this on me. But you really should be blaming the CIA, not me.