Did the Biden admin tamper with the Epstein files after Trump won the election ?

[TimFitz]

Pam was not in the Biden Administration, duh.

once upon a time, the Attorney General was the lawyer for the nation, not the Presiden’t personal attorney.

John Mitchell was a notable exception, providing cover for Nixon.

Then came Bill Barr, who ran cover for George W Bush and shamefully, for Trump.

Trump bought Bondi for a campaign contribution over the Trump U case, and she has provided cover for him ever since.

 

[TimFitz]

I've mentioned this in another thread, but if they really want to pursue the files, they should get Gabbard involved. She's the director of National Intelligence. She has the authority to demand evidence from the CIA, NSA, naval intelligence, etc. Those agencies likely have more information than the FBI, but strangely, the narrative pushed by the government and media is fixated on the FBI. It feels like an intentional deflection.

What? Trump wants this covered up, not made public!

 

[mudwhistle]

The exact opposite!

And it's very apparent that your cult-like behavior is a result of brainwashing techniques (gaslighting) by the media and Democrats. That's why every single time the screw something up...they can get away with blaming it all on Trump.
That's how authoritarians operate.
They supply you with a demon.....and then they blame everything they do on that demon.

 

[mudwhistle]

What? Trump wants this covered up, not made public!

Cover what up?

This fake Epstein client list you've been told by your corrupt media that existed during the entire Biden Administration?

 

[mudwhistle]

once upon a time, the Attorney General was the lawyer for the nation, not the Presiden’t personal attorney.

John Mitchell was a notable exception, providing cover for Nixon.

Then came Bill Barr, who ran cover for George W Bush and shamefully, for Trump.

Trump bought Bondi for a campaign contribution over the Trump U case, and she has provided cover for him ever since.

You're forgetting AG Garland....wasn't he bought as well?

 

[Rambunctious]

Were they????? Why would the file be on Garland’s desk when the matter was closed and the man was dead ???

Trump had Epstein arrested and Trump was in office when Epstein died. Whatever is in those files was in those files when Trump was in office.

Trump created this file, not Biden. Not Obama, and not Clinton either. Epstein died on Trump’s watch.

The Biden DOJ had full access to the files...

 

[mudwhistle]

The Biden DOJ had full access to the files...

That doesn't count, cuz it doesn't support their ridiculous ideology.

 

[Moonglow]

The Biden DOJ had full access to the files...

So did Trumps in 2019-2020

 

[Delldude]

once upon a time, the Attorney General was the lawyer for the nation, not the Presiden’t personal attorney.

John Mitchell was a notable exception, providing cover for Nixon.

Then came Bill Barr, who ran cover for George W Bush and shamefully, for Trump.

Trump bought Bondi for a campaign contribution over the Trump U case, and she has provided cover for him ever since.

You missed one.

"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy. So we’ll see," Holder said in an interview on the Tom Joyner radio show.

 

[j-mac]

once upon a time, the Attorney General was the lawyer for the nation, not the Presiden’t personal attorney.

John Mitchell was a notable exception, providing cover for Nixon.

Then came Bill Barr, who ran cover for George W Bush and shamefully, for Trump.

Trump bought Bondi for a campaign contribution over the Trump U case, and she has provided cover for him ever since.

Wow! You seemed to have jumped right over Eric (Obama's wing man) Holder, and Merrick (Carrying the torch for Biden) Garland....Wonder why that could be? Hmmmmm

 

[yidnar]

100% bombshell. You couldn’t make up anything worse.

The letter bearing Trump’s name, which was reviewed by the Journal, is bawdy—like others in the album. It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman’s breasts, and the future president’s signature is a squiggly “Donald” below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.

The letter concludes: “Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-...8d796?st=KEqL77&reflink=article_copyURL_share

wheres the letter ? does the WSJ have the letter? or is it just a left leaning Journalist "and yes the WSJ has a few" that claims to have seen it ? if the WSJ doesn't have concrete proof with a writing expert verifying it came from Trump they are going to pay a lot of money in restitution when Trump sues them .. A LOT OF MONEY ! .. I for one don't believe the man sitting in the WH would draw up such a childish letter ..

 

[yidnar]

Prove it.

Prove they didn't ..
speculation of something like this is not surprising after the Dem scams and lies perpetrated during their Russia gate treason ..

 

[JLW]

 

[Zincwarrior]

no.

Don’t be stupid.

Biden clearly needs to be sent to CECOT.

 

[citygator]

so

wheres the letter ? does the WSJ have the letter are is it a left leading Journalist "and yes the WSJ has a few" claims to have seen ? if the WSJ doesn't have concrete proof with a righting expert verifying it came from Trump they are going to pay a lot of money in restitution when Trumps sues them .. A LOT OF MONEY .. I for one don't believe the man sitting in the WH would draw up such a childish letter ..

When was the last time the Wall Street journal posted a fake letter purported to be from a president? WSJ is owned by Fox News owner Murdock.

It sure seems like something Trump should have released. What else is he hiding?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Of course they did or would if they could? Anything goes.

Remeber these same people willingly murdered or let people die off after they spread their 2020 Flu. They locked kids in houses for 2 years.

Nursing homes and Ventilators to get the count up.//

Meanwhile this is about Trump and Epstein. Good try though.

 

[Zincwarrior]

She also botched the Diddy Combs case!

We both know thats not why she was fired.

 

[yidnar]

Why would Epstein keep a list?

Any such list would be incriminating against him if discovered.
If he meant to use it as leverage to get off….Ghislaine Maxwell would have played that card.

very plausible .. I think when the info is finally revealed it will be bad but not as shocking as both sides of the political Isle believe ..

 

[Zincwarrior]

Cover what up?

This fake Epstein client list you've been told by your corrupt media that existed during the entire Biden Administration?

You mean what Trump, Trump Jr,Bongino,JD Vance, and Patel kept saying existed?

 

[yidnar]

You don't release evidence on men you are going to prosecute, until their trials or in discovery for the defendant prior to trial.

You don't release gathered information on a suspect they've investigated, when they determined after investigating that they had not committed a crime...

I just read an article by a lawyer who represents over 200 of the girls Epstein abused, and surprising to me....the lawyer said that Epstein was not passing his girls around to other influential men....there was no blackmailing scheme, that Epstein did this to his knowledge but a handful at most times and Epstein had THOUSANDS of young girls he abused over the period....he represents just 200 of them, other lawyers have the others but they do share info with each other.... This lawyer said Epstein was not blackmailing the rich and famous.....He had his secret work life, and separately his evil, sexual deviant, social life.

He said that Epstein was the sicko, with a continued unsatisfied appetite for more, new, girls, the younger in teen years, the better. The young girls got paid, by recruiting more young girls to his compound...

Here is the article....(I am still not finished yet, reading it)

What we know and don't know about Jeffrey Epstein, according to key victims' attorney

A lawyer who's represented more than 200 survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's sex abuse explains what is known about the case -- including claims of a so-called "client list."

abcnews.go.com

and that could be the total of what really happened .. it could have been a very small number of people that occasionally took part but the majority of the acts could have been Epstein having relations with under aged victims daily for decades .. the real scam could be that the authorities new about it and turned a blind eye because Epstein was a gov asset ..