Did Adam Schiff 'Tamper' With Jim Jordan Jan. 6 Evidence in Meadows Hearing?

[Penelope]

"There is absolutely no validity to the complaints about the way this text was excerpted during the House debate on holding Meadows in contempt," argued Norm Eisen, senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, who was co-counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during the first impeachment of Donald Trump.

"The fact that a period was inserted, possibly inadvertently, instead of an ellipsis on a graphic presentation is irrelevant. The use of a period versus an ellipsis doesn't change the meaning of the deeply troubling and false statement that the vice president should tamper with electoral votes," Eisen told Newsweek in an email.

Eisen added that it is normal to excerpt portions of materials when you are presenting such material in graphic form during a congressional debate, as there wouldn't have been enough room for all the words in the original text.

Fact Check: Did Adam Schiff 'Tamper' With Jim Jordan January 6 Evidence?

The January 6 committee chair has been accused of "doctoring" the content of a text message sent to Mark Meadows by the Ohio congressman.

www.newsweek.com

False as usual. Adam Schiff did not change the meaning of the text.

 

[westwall]

"There is absolutely no validity to the complaints about the way this text was excerpted during the House debate on holding Meadows in contempt," argued Norm Eisen, senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, who was co-counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during the first impeachment of Donald Trump.

"The fact that a period was inserted, possibly inadvertently, instead of an ellipsis on a graphic presentation is irrelevant. The use of a period versus an ellipsis doesn't change the meaning of the deeply troubling and false statement that the vice president should tamper with electoral votes," Eisen told Newsweek in an email.

Eisen added that it is normal to excerpt portions of materials when you are presenting such material in graphic form during a congressional debate, as there wouldn't have been enough room for all the words in the original text.

Fact Check: Did Adam Schiff 'Tamper' With Jim Jordan January 6 Evidence?

The January 6 committee chair has been accused of "doctoring" the content of a text message sent to Mark Meadows by the Ohio congressman.

www.newsweek.com

False as usual. Adam Schiff did not change the meaning of the text.

Other than the fact they ADMITTED IT.

Take your bullshit "fact checkers" and shove them up your fascist ass.

 

[eagle1462010]

Shifty is guilty of falsifying gov't documents and belongs in prison. But that doesn't happen in a country where they own the courts and DOJ

I wouldn't piss on Shifty if he was on fire.

 

[mudwhistle]

"There is absolutely no validity to the complaints about the way this text was excerpted during the House debate on holding Meadows in contempt," argued Norm Eisen, senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, who was co-counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during the first impeachment of Donald Trump.

"The fact that a period was inserted, possibly inadvertently, instead of an ellipsis on a graphic presentation is irrelevant. The use of a period versus an ellipsis doesn't change the meaning of the deeply troubling and false statement that the vice president should tamper with electoral votes," Eisen told Newsweek in an email.

Eisen added that it is normal to excerpt portions of materials when you are presenting such material in graphic form during a congressional debate, as there wouldn't have been enough room for all the words in the original text.

Fact Check: Did Adam Schiff 'Tamper' With Jim Jordan January 6 Evidence?

The January 6 committee chair has been accused of "doctoring" the content of a text message sent to Mark Meadows by the Ohio congressman.

www.newsweek.com

False as usual. Adam Schiff did not change the meaning of the text.

Here's the major flaw in Schiff's latest hoax: Trump wasn't in control of the Capital building. If he had taken control...Pelosi would have called it an abuse of his executive powers. Trump wasn't allowed to speak to the people of this country because Democrats controlled all forms of media. They used Trump's attempts to calm the so-called rioters as grounds to close his accounts on social media. He couldn't do anything short of sending Marines after the rioters....and that would have been labeled an abuse of power.

You just aren't able to look at the situation with a clear head.

Schiff is up to his old tricks, using doctored evidence to change the context of the so-called proof to push a completely false narrative. Pelosi is protecting this guy because he's responsible for two fake impeachments....and now a fake investigation into Jan 6th.
Schiff deleted two paragraphs of the text and inserted dialog into it....then tried to make his doctored text appear like an original document.

No evidence?

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

"There is absolutely no validity to the complaints about the way this text was excerpted during the House debate on holding Meadows in contempt," argued Norm Eisen, senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, who was co-counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during the first impeachment of Donald Trump.

"The fact that a period was inserted, possibly inadvertently, instead of an ellipsis on a graphic presentation is irrelevant. The use of a period versus an ellipsis doesn't change the meaning of the deeply troubling and false statement that the vice president should tamper with electoral votes," Eisen told Newsweek in an email.

Eisen added that it is normal to excerpt portions of materials when you are presenting such material in graphic form during a congressional debate, as there wouldn't have been enough room for all the words in the original text.

Fact Check: Did Adam Schiff 'Tamper' With Jim Jordan January 6 Evidence?

The January 6 committee chair has been accused of "doctoring" the content of a text message sent to Mark Meadows by the Ohio congressman.

www.newsweek.com

False as usual. Adam Schiff did not change the meaning of the text.

Christ , your a lying sack of shit.

 

[Penelope]

Christ , your a lying sack of shit.

he put a period in which Jim Jordan didn't do. Prove it.

 

[MarathonMike]

Penelope So you admit that Schiff altered Jordan's text and then presented it as evidence.