Dems have assembled a "shadow cabinet" for their latest insurrection, and it's hilarious

[marvin martian]

This is really, really funny.

The Dems' list of their insurrectionist "cabinet" members is a who's who of freaks, losers, and criminals.

Apparently, this scheme was hatched by vapid CIA stooge and alleged "senator" Elissa Slotkin

Enjoy:

Democrats Promote a New 'Shadow Cabinet' to Regain Power, and You Might Need to Sit Down First

redstate.com

As to who would serve in this "shadow cabinet," it's a murderers' row of the exact wrong people to promote. Samantha Power, who ran the USAID scam and is up to her eyeballs in decades worth of scandals, is suggested for "Shadow Secretary of State." New York Attorney General Letitia James, a woman currently under federal investigation for mortgage fraud, would be the "Shadow Attorney General." Jon Stewart, whose specialty is propagating a comedic mockery that grew stale about 20 years ago, would be the "Shadow Secretary of Veterans Affairs."

But if those aren't hilarious enough for you, the "Shadow Secretary of Homeland Security" would be none other than Gisele Fetterman, the selfie-obsessed former illegal immigrant wife of Sen. John Fetterman. Truly, this is one of the most incredible things the press has ever produced.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

It is just so sad for them that Pol Pot, Che Guevera and Mao Tse Dung are already quite thoroughly dead.

 

[Oddball]

 

[marvin martian]

It is just so sad for them that Pol Pot, Che Guevera and Mao Tse Dung are already quite thoroughly dead.

The true heroes of the left. They try to emulate those psychos at every opportunity. Along with Stalin, Hitler, Castro, and Marx.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

This is really, really funny.

The Dems' list of their insurrectionist "cabinet" members is a who's who of freaks, losers, and criminals.

Apparently, this scheme was hatched by vapid CIA stooge and alleged "senator" Elissa Slotkin

Enjoy:

Democrats Promote a New 'Shadow Cabinet' to Regain Power, and You Might Need to Sit Down First

redstate.com

As to who would serve in this "shadow cabinet," it's a murderers' row of the exact wrong people to promote. Samantha Power, who ran the USAID scam and is up to her eyeballs in decades worth of scandals, is suggested for "Shadow Secretary of State." New York Attorney General Letitia James, a woman currently under federal investigation for mortgage fraud, would be the "Shadow Attorney General." Jon Stewart, whose specialty is propagating a comedic mockery that grew stale about 20 years ago, would be the "Shadow Secretary of Veterans Affairs."

But if those aren't hilarious enough for you, the "Shadow Secretary of Homeland Security" would be none other than Gisele Fetterman, the selfie-obsessed former illegal immigrant wife of Sen. John Fetterman. Truly, this is one of the most incredible things the press has ever produced.

I'm not too worried they're batting 50.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

It is just so sad for them that Pol Pot, Che Guevera and Mao Tse Dung are already quite thoroughly dead.

Margaret Sanger
Saul Alinsky
Ku Klux Klan...
Hillary Clinton.

 

[toobfreak]

Dems have assembled a "shadow cabinet" for their latest insurrection, and it's hilarious​

Yeah, it's pretty funny, except for a few facts:

1. Sure, their ideas are whackjob, and their people nutty. But understand that for them to head in any sensible direction that common sense would dictate would only lead them /closer/ in alignment with Donald Trump! Could it be that Trump is driving them off the rails? Democrats are competing for the one voting faction not covered by the Trump Platform: The illegal alien, anti-American, socialist, fringe, druggie, groupie, pervert.
2. Despite the insanity of their platform, they continue to somehow manage to draw in enough votes each election to still remain competitive. I mean, Trump ought to be KILLING them in the polls with 80-90% popularity nationwide, not 42-52%. This leads democrats to believe their platform can still win with just the right campaign message, cover ups, lies, and election rigging. And remember, next election, republicans lose the Trump Edge that he brought to the party. Add to that many within the GOP are complete a-holes who regularly sabotage their own agenda.

So I never take the democrats lightly. If they could get 81 million votes for Joe Bedpan (their claim), anything is possible.

 

[martybegan]

This is really, really funny.

The Dems' list of their insurrectionist "cabinet" members is a who's who of freaks, losers, and criminals.

Apparently, this scheme was hatched by vapid CIA stooge and alleged "senator" Elissa Slotkin

Enjoy:

Democrats Promote a New 'Shadow Cabinet' to Regain Power, and You Might Need to Sit Down First

redstate.com

As to who would serve in this "shadow cabinet," it's a murderers' row of the exact wrong people to promote. Samantha Power, who ran the USAID scam and is up to her eyeballs in decades worth of scandals, is suggested for "Shadow Secretary of State." New York Attorney General Letitia James, a woman currently under federal investigation for mortgage fraud, would be the "Shadow Attorney General." Jon Stewart, whose specialty is propagating a comedic mockery that grew stale about 20 years ago, would be the "Shadow Secretary of Veterans Affairs."

But if those aren't hilarious enough for you, the "Shadow Secretary of Homeland Security" would be none other than Gisele Fetterman, the selfie-obsessed former illegal immigrant wife of Sen. John Fetterman. Truly, this is one of the most incredible things the press has ever produced.

They stole the idea from parliamentary type opposition parties. Due to votes of no Confidence being able to call snap elections, the opposition has to be ready to present their positions at a moment's notice. Hence the "shadow" government, really just placeholders for who would be getting what positions in a government if the opposition wins.

 

[Oddball]

It is just so sad for them that Pol Pot, Che Guevera and Mao Tse Dung are already quite thoroughly dead.

They're still not over how the Spanish Civil War shook out!

 

[marvin martian]

They stole the idea from parliamentary type opposition parties. Due to votes of no Confidence being able to call snap elections, the opposition has to be ready to present their positions at a moment's notice. Hence the "shadow" government, really just placeholders for who would be getting what positions in a government if the opposition wins.

So the Dems really want to put an illegal alien in the role of Secretary of Homeland Security?

 

[martybegan]

So the Dems really want to put an illegal alien in the role of Secretary of Homeland Security?

Are you really that surprised?

 

[martybegan]

They're still not over how the Spanish Civil War shook out!

Go before that. their intellectual ancestors saw the Bolshevik revolution as a blueprint until Stalin exposed the inherent flaws of both the system and the attempts to transition to that system.

 

[Foxfyre]

This is really, really funny.

The Dems' list of their insurrectionist "cabinet" members is a who's who of freaks, losers, and criminals.

Apparently, this scheme was hatched by vapid CIA stooge and alleged "senator" Elissa Slotkin

Enjoy:

Democrats Promote a New 'Shadow Cabinet' to Regain Power, and You Might Need to Sit Down First

redstate.com

As to who would serve in this "shadow cabinet," it's a murderers' row of the exact wrong people to promote. Samantha Power, who ran the USAID scam and is up to her eyeballs in decades worth of scandals, is suggested for "Shadow Secretary of State." New York Attorney General Letitia James, a woman currently under federal investigation for mortgage fraud, would be the "Shadow Attorney General." Jon Stewart, whose specialty is propagating a comedic mockery that grew stale about 20 years ago, would be the "Shadow Secretary of Veterans Affairs."

But if those aren't hilarious enough for you, the "Shadow Secretary of Homeland Security" would be none other than Gisele Fetterman, the selfie-obsessed former illegal immigrant wife of Sen. John Fetterman. Truly, this is one of the most incredible things the press has ever produced.

Is this for real? Not a spoof?

 

[Foxfyre]

Yeah, it's pretty funny, except for a few facts:

1. Sure, their ideas are whackjob, and their people nutty. But understand that for them to head in any sensible direction that common sense would dictate would only lead them /closer/ in alignment with Donald Trump! Could it be that Trump is driving them off the rails? Democrats are competing for the one voting faction not covered by the Trump Platform: The illegal alien, anti-American, socialist, fringe, druggie, groupie, pervert.
2. Despite the insanity of their platform, they continue to somehow manage to draw in enough votes each election to still remain competitive. I mean, Trump ought to be KILLING them in the polls with 80-90% popularity nationwide, not 42-52%. This leads democrats to believe their platform can still win with just the right campaign message, cover ups, lies, and election rigging. And remember, next election, republicans lose the Trump Edge that he brought to the party. Add to that many within the GOP are complete a-holes who regularly sabotage their own agenda.

So I never take the democrats lightly. If they could get 81 million votes for Joe Bedpan (their claim), anything is possible.

Rush Limbaugh always said that the 'liberals'--(we all know how ridiculous that label is for the most un-liberal minded political group in U.S. history)--are the funniest, most deranged, most irrational, most extreme when they are out of power. The most recent call on that subject is in text here:

Lots of good content in this discussion but this is the gist of it:
". . .They (modern-day liberals) don’t look at reality as something they have to adjust to, adapt to, and blend. No, no, no, no, no, no. Because reality isn’t real. It is a construction of the powerful to set up circumstances to deny them access to whatever it is; Equality, freedom, you name it. They’re a bunch of sick people, and they’re not going to go away, and they’re gonna continue to be disruptive. This is why I have, over the years, begged people to understand that they are not to be accommodated; they’re to be defeated. They’re the ones that make everything political — and in the process, every battle with them is political, and they need to be defeated.

We don’t need to cross the aisle and work with them. They’re not interested in that. They don’t compromise; they don’t think there’s any need to it, because they’re not wrong. They’re perfect or what have you, even though they’re sick. So we laugh at ’em for our own entertainment. And, by the way, we laugh at ’em as a means of explaining to other people who maybe are not politically oriented who they are. But they’re never going away, and they’re never gonna stop being disruptive, and they’re never going to accept whatever it is that they disagree with. . .”

Liberals Reject Reality

RUSH: When I say, "They don't recognize defeat," what I mean by that is that they do not think they lost. They do not think that what happened is real. Remember, as I said yesterday in a recent profundity, to understand modern-day liberalism you must understand that they reject reality. To...

www.rushlimbaugh.com

 

[Etymology gaslight]

So the Dems really want to put an illegal alien in the role of Secretary of Homeland Security?

They got Obama elected.
Nobody asked questions.

 

[my2¢]

I don't see anything funny about the way these political parties put their own self-interest ahead of the job taxpayers elected them to do.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

I don't see anything funny about the way these political parties put their own self-interest ahead of the job taxpayers elected them to do.

Same here let Americans keep their paychecks.

The funny part is how dimwitted
and incorageable they are.

 

[marvin martian]

Are you really that surprised?

I guess I'm surprised they're willing to torch whatever credibility they still have with sane people.