Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Pennsylvania court orders new congressional map due to gerrymandering
"(Reuters) - Pennsylvania’s top court on Monday threw out the state’s congressional map, ruling that Republican legislators unlawfully sought partisan advantage, and gave them three weeks to rework it in a decision that could boost Democratic chances of retaking the U.S. House of Representatives."
The more elections that Republicans have to win fair and square, the fewer they will win. Awesome.
So something Dems did for decades is now illegal....
You also forgot to mention the split on the Penn SC is 5 Dems to 2 Republicans....
Funny post.
You have no real response....figures.
There is nothing of value in your post. That's what makes it funny.
I stated the obvious truth, something people like you willful ignore.
the obvious truth that apparently is pointless.
How does Iowa do it?Gerrymandering needs to stop once and for all. It would be great if we could get all 50 states to adopt the Iowa method, which seems to be the fairest. We also need to expand the size of the House of Representatives as that would also help dilute the propensity to gerrymander as districts would be geographically smaller and represent fewer people. We aren't getting representation when one person is elected out of a district of 700,000.
How does Iowa do it?Gerrymandering needs to stop once and for all. It would be great if we could get all 50 states to adopt the Iowa method, which seems to be the fairest. We also need to expand the size of the House of Representatives as that would also help dilute the propensity to gerrymander as districts would be geographically smaller and represent fewer people. We aren't getting representation when one person is elected out of a district of 700,000.
Funny post.
You have no real response....figures.
There is nothing of value in your post. That's what makes it funny.
I stated the obvious truth, something people like you willful ignore.
the obvious truth that apparently is pointless.
No, Dems have been gerrymandering as long as Republicans have. Dems are just better at using the courts to attack the other side for exactly what they are doing/want to do.
They also waited until they had a Dem majority on the Penn SC for this case to reach the end.
You have no real response....figures.
There is nothing of value in your post. That's what makes it funny.
I stated the obvious truth, something people like you willful ignore.
the obvious truth that apparently is pointless.
No, Dems have been gerrymandering as long as Republicans have. Dems are just better at using the courts to attack the other side for exactly what they are doing/want to do.
They also waited until they had a Dem majority on the Penn SC for this case to reach the end.
So you're for gerrymandering if Republicans do it, but against it if Democrats do it.
That's funnier yet.
Are you OK with Dems doing it?You have no real response....figures.
There is nothing of value in your post. That's what makes it funny.
I stated the obvious truth, something people like you willful ignore.
the obvious truth that apparently is pointless.
No, Dems have been gerrymandering as long as Republicans have. Dems are just better at using the courts to attack the other side for exactly what they are doing/want to do.
They also waited until they had a Dem majority on the Penn SC for this case to reach the end.
So you're for gerrymandering if Republicans do it, but against it if Democrats do it.
That's funnier yet.
That's an old article. Judges have already forced the legislators to redraw NC-12 and FL-5