Democrats Vote To End American Sovereignty.

[PoliticalChic]

There is no denying their hatred of this nation.
Here is the other half of their open borders policy:

"House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections​

“There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.”

The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 8770 today. As Tweeted by House Judiciary GOP:

Judiciary Democrats just voted to support NON-CITIZENS voting in our elections. There’s no hiding it. Democrats WANT non-citizens voting in our elections.

House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. “There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.” The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature...

thelibertydaily.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

Who'd you vote for?????

 

[beautress]

So sorry to hear this, Political Chic. I am without words.

 

[konradv]

There is no denying their hatred of this nation.
Here is the other half of their open borders policy:

"House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections​

“There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.”

The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 8770 today. As Tweeted by House Judiciary GOP:

House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. “There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.” The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature...

thelibertydaily.com

Where’s subsection (h)?

 

[DGS49]

The text shown above says exactly the opposite of what the OP says. "Nothing in this section may be construed...to permit any non-citizen to vote..."

What gives?

 

[Sixties Fan]

[ Pinnocchio's Republican nose, growing and growing by the day ]

Today Rep. Val Demings (FL-10) and the House Judiciary Committee voted to pass the Expanding the Voluntary Opportunities for Translations in Elections Act (“Expanding the VOTE Act”) which Rep. Demings supported as an original cosponsor. The legislation would amend the Voting Rights Act to ensure that every eligible voter has the ability to fully participate in American democracy, no matter their English-language proficiency.

Said Rep. Demings, “Voting is a right, not a privilege. My parents often worked seven days a week as a maid and janitor, but I don’t ever remember a time when they did not vote. My parents, like working Americans across our country, knew that their vote is their voice, no matter what language you speak at home. Our democracy is what keeps America prosperous, safe, and free. If you believe in democracy, you should make it easier for everyone to vote, even the people who don’t look like you or don’t speak like you. America is a great nation because we protect the voices of the American people.”

Said Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairman Dr. Raul Ruiz, “Our democracy is strongest when every voice can be heard. With over 41.7 million Spanish-speakers in the United States, it is crucial that we ensure that election materials are accessible for all. That is why, as Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC), I support the Expanding the VOTE Act to empower jurisdictions to meet the language needs of their populations, including Latinos.”

Said Congresswoman Judy Chu, Chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, “Over the years we have seen a tremendous increase in AAPI voter turnout – and it is encouraging to see members of our community showing up in droves to the ballot box and making their voices heard. However, for many, including the one-third of the AAPI community that is limited English proficient (LEP), language barriers create additional challenges and can often deter individuals from participating in our democracy. The Expanding the VOTE Act would strengthen the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by ensuring jurisdictions have the resources needed to meet the language needs of every community. Congress has a duty to act to further bolster democratic participation and protect this foundational right bestowed to every American citizen.”

House Judiciary Passes Demings-Backed Election Bill

WASHINGTON – Today Rep. Val Demings (FL-10) and the House Judiciary Committee voted to pass the Expanding the Voluntary Opportunities for Translations in Elections Act (“Expanding the VOTE Act”) which Rep. Demings supported as an original cosponsor. The legislation would amend the Voting Rights...

demings.house.gov

 

[Mac1958]

Where’s subsection (h)?

It doesn't matter.

 

[TNHarley]

Where’s subsection (h)?

Doesnt matter. It says beginning on line 8, anyways.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Q: Did House passage of H.R. 1 allow noncitizens to vote?

A: No. That bill would enact a host of changes to election laws, but it does not permit noncitizens to vote.

FULL QUESTION​

Is it true that the Democrats in the House of Representatives voted for the right of illegal immigrants to vote in the US?

FULL ANSWER​

When Democrats reclaimed control of the House in January, they introduced H.R. 1 — a bill number designated to signal the importance of this legislation, which is designed to combat political corruption and increase voter participation. The bill, known as For the People Act, keeps a campaign pledge from the midterm election.

The bill passed the House along party lines on March 8, but it’s unlikely to move forward. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has already said the Republican-controlled chamber would not take it up.

Even so, the measure has generated confusion among readers and social media users, where distortions and falsehoods about the bill have spread.

“HR1 passed. Allowing illegal immigrants (foreigners) to vote,” a popular Facebook post claims.

The comprehensive bill, which would make numerous changes to election laws, doesn’t do that.

Among the many things the bill would do, if it were ever to become law: make Election Day a federal holiday; require states to automatically register eligible voters; compel states to create independent commissions to oversee redistricting; implement campaign-finance and election-security changes; and require presidential and vice presidential candidates to release 10 years of tax returns. Trump in 2016 broke with the tradition of past presidential candidates by not releasing his tax returns.

The confusion regarding noncitizens stems from the use of a legislative maneuver, known as a motion to recommit, that represented the last opportunity for the Republicans to amend the bill before it was passed.

On March 8, the same day the House cast its final vote on the bill, Texas Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw introduced a Motion to Recommit H.R. 1 to the Judiciary Committee with instructions to add language condemning voting by “illegal immigrants.”

But “sense of Congress” provisions, such as the one offered by Crenshaw, have “no force of law,” as explained in a Congressional Research Service report.

“A ‘sense of’ resolution is not legally binding because it is not presented to the President for his signature,” the CRS report said. “Even if a ‘sense of’ provision is incorporated into a bill that becomes law, such provisions merely express the opinion of Congress or the relevant chamber. They have no formal effect on public policy and have no force of law.”

Federal law explicitly prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections, and no state has allowed it since the 1920s.

The vast majority of House Democrats voted against Crenshaw’s motion, as did one Republican, Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan.

Crenshaw, while speaking on the floor of the House, invoked San Francisco as an example of noncitizens voting: “The city of San Francisco has effectively cancelled out the votes of its citizens and replaced it with illegals’.”

But he failed to specify that noncitizens in San Francisco only have the right to vote in school board elections. (The motion he proposed, however, makes that clear.) As we’ve written before, the city allows noncitizens, including those in the country illegally, to vote in school board elections if they are the parent or guardian of a student.

A total of 12 jurisdictions throughout the country allow noncitizen residents to vote in some local elections regardless of legal status, according to Ron Hayduk, a professor of political science at San Francisco State University who studies immigrant voting and has advocated allowing noncitizens to vote. Those jurisdictions include San Francisco (for school board elections), Chicago (for local school council elections) and 10 towns in Maryland where noncitizens can vote in local races.

And, as we’ve written previously, experts say voter fraud by noncitizens is rare, in part because of the consequences, which could include deportation.

Even though Crenshaw’s motion would have had no policy effect if approved, Democrats’ rejection of it became the subject of headlines such as this one in the Washington Times: “House votes in favor of illegal immigrant voting.”

A website known for distributing false news, News Punch — formerly known as Your News Wire — carried a similar headline and opened with the misleading claim that “House Democrats voted Friday to allow illegal immigrants to vote in American elections — turning their back on the U.S. Constitution.”

Likewise, Republican Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana told reporters on March 12 that “last week, we had legislation on the floor to prevent people that are here illegally from voting. And you saw Democrats vote against that. In essence, voting to allow people here illegally to vote in elections and to use taxpayer funds to help people here illegally to vote.”

Again, that’s misleading: The motion would have had no effect on the law, and there was no vote to give immigrants in the country illegally the right to vote. Voting by noncitizens is prohibited in federal and state elections, as well as almost all local elections — save for a few exceptions on the local level. That was the case both before and after the House’s approval of H.R. 1.

Misinformation Follows House Approval of H.R. 1 - FactCheck.org

Q: Did House passage of H.R. 1 allow noncitizens to vote? A: No. That bill would enact a host of changes to election laws, but it does not permit noncitizens to vote. FULL QUESTION Is it true that the Democrats in the House of Representatives voted for the right of illegal immigrants to vote in...

www.factcheck.org

 

[TNHarley]

Even if this was true, it cant happen. There is a process to amending the constitution.

 

[Paleman]

[ Pinnocchio's Republican nose, growing and growing by the day ]

Today Rep. Val Demings (FL-10) and the House Judiciary Committee voted to pass the Expanding the Voluntary Opportunities for Translations in Elections Act (“Expanding the VOTE Act”) which Rep. Demings supported as an original cosponsor. The legislation would amend the Voting Rights Act to ensure that every eligible voter has the ability to fully participate in American democracy, no matter their English-language proficiency.

Said Rep. Demings, “Voting is a right, not a privilege. My parents often worked seven days a week as a maid and janitor, but I don’t ever remember a time when they did not vote. My parents, like working Americans across our country, knew that their vote is their voice, no matter what language you speak at home. Our democracy is what keeps America prosperous, safe, and free. If you believe in democracy, you should make it easier for everyone to vote, even the people who don’t look like you or don’t speak like you. America is a great nation because we protect the voices of the American people.”

Said Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairman Dr. Raul Ruiz, “Our democracy is strongest when every voice can be heard. With over 41.7 million Spanish-speakers in the United States, it is crucial that we ensure that election materials are accessible for all. That is why, as Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC), I support the Expanding the VOTE Act to empower jurisdictions to meet the language needs of their populations, including Latinos.”

Said Congresswoman Judy Chu, Chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, “Over the years we have seen a tremendous increase in AAPI voter turnout – and it is encouraging to see members of our community showing up in droves to the ballot box and making their voices heard. However, for many, including the one-third of the AAPI community that is limited English proficient (LEP), language barriers create additional challenges and can often deter individuals from participating in our democracy. The Expanding the VOTE Act would strengthen the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by ensuring jurisdictions have the resources needed to meet the language needs of every community. Congress has a duty to act to further bolster democratic participation and protect this foundational right bestowed to every American citizen.”

House Judiciary Passes Demings-Backed Election Bill

WASHINGTON – Today Rep. Val Demings (FL-10) and the House Judiciary Committee voted to pass the Expanding the Voluntary Opportunities for Translations in Elections Act (“Expanding the VOTE Act”) which Rep. Demings supported as an original cosponsor. The legislation would amend the Voting Rights...

demings.house.gov

DEMONRATS don't care if you can speak English, read English or even understand English, so this is my question. How in the hell can you intelligently cast a vote under these conditions. ANSWER---You can't. The only reason DEMONRATS are pushing this agenda is their belief that Latinos are going to continue to vote DEMONRAT. Only a fool would support this.

 

[Sixties Fan]

DEMONRATS don't care if you can speak English, read English or even understand English, so this is my question. How in the hell can you intelligently cast a vote under these conditions. ANSWER---You can't. The only reason DEMONRATS are pushing this agenda is their belief that Latinos are going to continue to vote DEMONRAT. Only a fool would support this.

It is not about Latinos. It is about all CITIZENS who do not speak English, or very well, who are going to get a ballot in their language sot that they understand who they are voting for.

It is to help American CITIZENS, only.

Got it now????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Where’s subsection (h)?

Exactly when did you begin transitioning into a Fascist, with a burning distate for America????

 

[PoliticalChic]

The text shown above says exactly the opposite of what the OP says. "Nothing in this section may be construed...to permit any non-citizen to vote..."

What gives?

You miss the point again: the OP is one more example of the Democrat's hatred of America.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

There is no denying their hatred of this nation.
Here is the other half of their open borders policy:

"House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections​

“There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.”

The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 8770 today. As Tweeted by House Judiciary GOP:

House Judiciary Votes for Allowing NON-CITIZENS to Vote in Federal Elections - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. “There it is,” quipped one political commentator on social media. “There’s the way they turn illegal aliens into Democrat voters.” The House Judiciary voted to allow non-citizens to vote in an amendment to the amendment in the nature...

thelibertydaily.com

Your algorithm needs tweaking. Looks like you stepped in it this time.
That's not what was passed in the bill and no non US citizens (undocumented) will be allowed to vote.

 

[PoliticalChic]

[ Pinnocchio's Republican nose, growing and growing by the day ]

Today Rep. Val Demings (FL-10) and the House Judiciary Committee voted to pass the Expanding the Voluntary Opportunities for Translations in Elections Act (“Expanding the VOTE Act”) which Rep. Demings supported as an original cosponsor. The legislation would amend the Voting Rights Act to ensure that every eligible voter has the ability to fully participate in American democracy, no matter their English-language proficiency.

Said Rep. Demings, “Voting is a right, not a privilege. My parents often worked seven days a week as a maid and janitor, but I don’t ever remember a time when they did not vote. My parents, like working Americans across our country, knew that their vote is their voice, no matter what language you speak at home. Our democracy is what keeps America prosperous, safe, and free. If you believe in democracy, you should make it easier for everyone to vote, even the people who don’t look like you or don’t speak like you. America is a great nation because we protect the voices of the American people.”

Said Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairman Dr. Raul Ruiz, “Our democracy is strongest when every voice can be heard. With over 41.7 million Spanish-speakers in the United States, it is crucial that we ensure that election materials are accessible for all. That is why, as Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC), I support the Expanding the VOTE Act to empower jurisdictions to meet the language needs of their populations, including Latinos.”

Said Congresswoman Judy Chu, Chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, “Over the years we have seen a tremendous increase in AAPI voter turnout – and it is encouraging to see members of our community showing up in droves to the ballot box and making their voices heard. However, for many, including the one-third of the AAPI community that is limited English proficient (LEP), language barriers create additional challenges and can often deter individuals from participating in our democracy. The Expanding the VOTE Act would strengthen the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by ensuring jurisdictions have the resources needed to meet the language needs of every community. Congress has a duty to act to further bolster democratic participation and protect this foundational right bestowed to every American citizen.”

House Judiciary Passes Demings-Backed Election Bill

WASHINGTON – Today Rep. Val Demings (FL-10) and the House Judiciary Committee voted to pass the Expanding the Voluntary Opportunities for Translations in Elections Act (“Expanding the VOTE Act”) which Rep. Demings supported as an original cosponsor. The legislation would amend the Voting Rights...

demings.house.gov

Are you in favor of illegals voting, as Obama told them to do....and of non-citizens voting in federal elections.



Answer the question, Elmer.

 

[Mac1958]

Q: Did House passage of H.R. 1 allow noncitizens to vote?

A: No. That bill would enact a host of changes to election laws, but it does not permit noncitizens to vote.

FULL QUESTION​

Is it true that the Democrats in the House of Representatives voted for the right of illegal immigrants to vote in the US?

FULL ANSWER​

When Democrats reclaimed control of the House in January, they introduced H.R. 1 — a bill number designated to signal the importance of this legislation, which is designed to combat political corruption and increase voter participation. The bill, known as For the People Act, keeps a campaign pledge from the midterm election.

The bill passed the House along party lines on March 8, but it’s unlikely to move forward. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has already said the Republican-controlled chamber would not take it up.

Even so, the measure has generated confusion among readers and social media users, where distortions and falsehoods about the bill have spread.

“HR1 passed. Allowing illegal immigrants (foreigners) to vote,” a popular Facebook post claims.

The comprehensive bill, which would make numerous changes to election laws, doesn’t do that.

Among the many things the bill would do, if it were ever to become law: make Election Day a federal holiday; require states to automatically register eligible voters; compel states to create independent commissions to oversee redistricting; implement campaign-finance and election-security changes; and require presidential and vice presidential candidates to release 10 years of tax returns. Trump in 2016 broke with the tradition of past presidential candidates by not releasing his tax returns.

The confusion regarding noncitizens stems from the use of a legislative maneuver, known as a motion to recommit, that represented the last opportunity for the Republicans to amend the bill before it was passed.

On March 8, the same day the House cast its final vote on the bill, Texas Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw introduced a Motion to Recommit H.R. 1 to the Judiciary Committee with instructions to add language condemning voting by “illegal immigrants.”

But “sense of Congress” provisions, such as the one offered by Crenshaw, have “no force of law,” as explained in a Congressional Research Service report.

“A ‘sense of’ resolution is not legally binding because it is not presented to the President for his signature,” the CRS report said. “Even if a ‘sense of’ provision is incorporated into a bill that becomes law, such provisions merely express the opinion of Congress or the relevant chamber. They have no formal effect on public policy and have no force of law.”

Federal law explicitly prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections, and no state has allowed it since the 1920s.

The vast majority of House Democrats voted against Crenshaw’s motion, as did one Republican, Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan.

Crenshaw, while speaking on the floor of the House, invoked San Francisco as an example of noncitizens voting: “The city of San Francisco has effectively cancelled out the votes of its citizens and replaced it with illegals’.”

But he failed to specify that noncitizens in San Francisco only have the right to vote in school board elections. (The motion he proposed, however, makes that clear.) As we’ve written before, the city allows noncitizens, including those in the country illegally, to vote in school board elections if they are the parent or guardian of a student.

A total of 12 jurisdictions throughout the country allow noncitizen residents to vote in some local elections regardless of legal status, according to Ron Hayduk, a professor of political science at San Francisco State University who studies immigrant voting and has advocated allowing noncitizens to vote. Those jurisdictions include San Francisco (for school board elections), Chicago (for local school council elections) and 10 towns in Maryland where noncitizens can vote in local races.

And, as we’ve written previously, experts say voter fraud by noncitizens is rare, in part because of the consequences, which could include deportation.

Even though Crenshaw’s motion would have had no policy effect if approved, Democrats’ rejection of it became the subject of headlines such as this one in the Washington Times: “House votes in favor of illegal immigrant voting.”

A website known for distributing false news, News Punch — formerly known as Your News Wire — carried a similar headline and opened with the misleading claim that “House Democrats voted Friday to allow illegal immigrants to vote in American elections — turning their back on the U.S. Constitution.”

Likewise, Republican Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana told reporters on March 12 that “last week, we had legislation on the floor to prevent people that are here illegally from voting. And you saw Democrats vote against that. In essence, voting to allow people here illegally to vote in elections and to use taxpayer funds to help people here illegally to vote.”

Again, that’s misleading: The motion would have had no effect on the law, and there was no vote to give immigrants in the country illegally the right to vote. Voting by noncitizens is prohibited in federal and state elections, as well as almost all local elections — save for a few exceptions on the local level. That was the case both before and after the House’s approval of H.R. 1.

Misinformation Follows House Approval of H.R. 1 - FactCheck.org

Q: Did House passage of H.R. 1 allow noncitizens to vote? A: No. That bill would enact a host of changes to election laws, but it does not permit noncitizens to vote. FULL QUESTION Is it true that the Democrats in the House of Representatives voted for the right of illegal immigrants to vote in...

www.factcheck.org

All the reality in the world doesn't matter to these people.

This is their world. Misinformation, paranoia, manipulation, grievance.

And this is all over the internet and the radio as we speak.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your algorithm needs tweaking. Looks like you stepped in it this time.
That's not what was passed in the bill and no non US citizens (undocumented) will be allowed to vote.

Are you in favor of illegals voting, as Obama told them to do....and of non-citizens voting in federal elections.



Answer the question, Elmer.

 

[DukeU]

It is not about Latinos. It is about all CITIZENS who do not speak English, or very well, who are going to get a ballot in their language sot that they understand who they are voting for.

It is to help American CITIZENS, only.

Got it now????

A name don't change because the language does. DUH.

 

[PoliticalChic]

All the reality in the world doesn't matter to these people.

This is their world. Misinformation, paranoia, manipulation, grievance.

And this is all over the internet and the radio as we speak.

Are you in favor of illegals voting, as Obama told them to do....and of non-citizens voting in federal elections.



Answer the question, Elmer.