Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. Roll dice ? What a ridiculous thing to say, EVERY protestor at the home of a SCOTUS justice is there intimidating. That's what they're doing. I cant imagine a prosecutor having a smidgin of reluctance to prosecute those cases.Let me start with this: Being specific and including links to the Criminal Code is good. Points for that.
This does look as if you're picking and choosing, though. You're presenting this as an academic argument while at the same time, editorializing and name-calling the Democrats, revealing your partisanship. You're displaying evidence but not showing any contrast, because you've instead chosen to leave out right-wing actions, which include mail bombs, kidnap attempts, and, oh yes, storming the Capitol. That undermines what could be a convincing argument into being just another rant about the lefties.
I don't have time to fact-check the whole spiel, but it does look to me as if you are oversimplifying the legal case in section 1. US Code 18, Section 1507 is part of a whole section on obstruction of justice, and any application of it has to balance the law itself with the protesters' First Amendment right to free speech. In practice, that probably would come down to intent, meaning that the prosecutor would have to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the protestor charged had the clear and specific intent to threaten or intimidate or worse, the target (Justice Kavanaugh, in this case). Unless there's some enormous special circumstance of which I'm unfamiliar, I can't imagine a prosecutor who would be anxious or excited to roll those dice.
If you really want to make your case stronger, I would advise that you use more objective language, skip the Federalist and New York Post links, and learn and explain how the statutes and procedures function in practice, then draw a conclusion from there, rather than trying to tailor the argument to meet your pre-determined bias. If the Democrats and left-wing are getting away with as much as you believe they are, the evidence will clearly point to that on its own, without needing to be steered that way.
Retardation is not being able to comprehend the OP. Democrats are the party of crime, no matter if I or anyone else calls them that. Get it ?Projectionist titles his thread "Democrats, the party of crime." Very first line he states that it's not me calling them that.
Retardation jumps the shark.
Turn on the TV. The party of crime is being discussed today, and It's not the Democrats.Retardation is not being able to comprehend the OP. Democrats are the party of crime, no matter if I or anyone else calls them that. Get it ?
Party/schmarty; liberalism is baked into the law and the bureaucracy.Turn on the TV. The party of crime is being discussed today, and It's not the Democrats.
I'm not seeing the problem with that.Party/schmarty; liberalism is baked into the law and the bureaucracy.
Liberalism/law is an oxymoron.I'm not seeing the problem with that.
Of course you don't see a problem, if you are a liberal.I'm not seeing the problem with that.
I'm not a Liberal. I'm a Leftest.Of course you don't see a problem, if you are a liberal.![]()
Is this you?I'm not a Liberal. I'm a Leftest.
No.Is this you?
Left Wing vs Right Wing - Difference and Comparison | Diffen
What's the difference between Left Wing and Right Wing? The fundamental differences between left-wing and right-wing ideologies center around the the rights of individuals vs. the power of the government. Left-wing beliefs are liberal in that they believe society is best served with an expanded...www.diffen.com
You're a fast reader.
Evelyn Woodhead was my first wife.You're a fast reader.![]()
All depends on what channel you watch. The Democrat party of crime is being discussed right now on Newsmax, and that has been discussed there all day long. Yesterday and tomorrow too.Turn on the TV. The party of crime is being discussed today, and It's not the Democrats.
I asked you before where you were getting your dumb propaganda, and you evaded. Now you've let it slip. You seem to be ashamed of your source. But then, any normal human would be ashamed of using Newsmax as a source, so maybe there's still hope for you.The Democrat party of crime is being discussed right now on Newsmax,
Sounds like you're talking about the leftist media, and all the trash they brainwash you with. I didn't slip about anything. I watch Newsmax all the time, and every show is informative and the perfect cure for information-deprived victims of liberal OMISSION/DISTORTION media. I constantly have liberals questioning me about things Newsmax watchers have known for years. Sure, because they don't get told what's going on, at the left propaganda channels.I asked you before where you were getting your dumb propaganda, and you evaded. Now you've let it slip. You seem to be ashamed of your source. But then, any normal human would be ashamed of using Newsmax as a source, so maybe there's still hope for you.
Those outside of you cult clearly see how TheParty deliberately keeps you hysterical, because that keeps you obedient. So very, very obedient, obedient to the point where sheep look like proud independent thinkers in comparison.
Now, what has Newsmax specifically told you to soil yourself over today? Remember, propaganda parrot is your assigned job, so don't let TheParty down.
Really ?Is it me who is calling the Democrats the Crime Party ? No. Is it Donald Trump, Mike Pence, or Mike Pompeo ? Nope. Ben Carson or Jeffery Rosen ? Not them either.
It is Democrats themselves who are calling and defining themselves as that, by their action and inactions >>
1. Last week and still now, Democrat abortion freaks are protesting at the homes of US Supreme Court justices. In one case, one guy (26-year-old California man Nicholas John Roske) was arrested early Wednesday near Justice Kavanaugh's house in Maryland, after threatening to kill the justice. Police said he was carrying a gun, a knife and zip ties. Roske has been charged with the attempted murder of a Supreme Court Justice, but what about all the others who are committing a federal CRIME (US Code 18, Section 1507) - unlawful to protest near a “residence occupied or used by [a] judge, juror, witness, or court officer” with the intent of influencing “the discharge of his duty,” adding that anyone who “uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
YET, despite that it’s Attorney General Merrick Garland’s responsibility to enforce this law, we see no action being taken against these protestors, or even a peep of dissent toward their illegal activity, from the Biden administration. Despite multiple inquiries, Justice Department spokesman Anthony Coley refused to explain what steps Garland was taking to protect justices or enforce the law.
Last month, the group calling itself “Ruth Sent Us,” published the locations of the justices’ homes on its website. White House press secretary Jen Psaki refused to condemn the doxing. She said that she didn’t have “an official U.S. government position on where people protest.”
FALSE! There is in fact an “official U.S. government position on where people protest” — it’s 18 U.S.C. 1507.
2. A few years ago, then Tampa Democrat Mayor Bob Buckhorn kept Tampa police from arresting dozens of Black Lives Matter protestors who were blocking traffic on a busy downtown street, endangering lives.
This is a CRIME (Florida Statute 316.2045), which since then has become a felony.
3. In Seattle, when rioters took over an entire neighborhood, the Democrat mayor, Jenny Durkan called it a "block party" and "Summer of Love". She ordered the evacuation of the police department, resulting in the city descending into utter lawlessness and civic breakdown. After city leaders all Democrats, ordered police to evacuate a police station and abandon a six-block neighborhood to radical left-wing groups, those groups established the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ), since relabeled an Occupied Protest (CHOP). Meanwhile, Seattle leaders expected everyone else to behave responsibly, respect the law, and follow every law exactly. To Seattle looney Democrat leaders, one person robbing one store is a crime, but mass looting an entire shopping district is just a “protest.” This lunacy went on resulting in one man being killed and others seriously wounded, in shootings since the no-police zone began.
![]()
Seattle Leaders Allow Rioting While Strictly Enforcing Parking And Taxes
Seattle’s elected officials allow widespread law-breaking by some, while imposing full enforcement on the rest of us. It isn't sustainable.thefederalist.com
4. In Ferguson, MO, rioters took over a large section of the city. The whole nation watched in amazement while rioters did anything they wanted including mass arson and looting. The overwhelmed police could have controlled the situation with the assistance of the National Guard, but Democrat governor Jay Nixon, called out the Guard, and then sent them 10 miles away from the rioting. He might as well have joined the rioters himself.
5. In Baltimore MD, then Mayor Stephanie Rawlings, on "advice " from Al Sharpton and Barrack Obama, ordered police to stand down while rioters rioted. Once the rioters sensed the police were standing down, and not enforcing the law, they attacked the police, throwing rocks & bottles at them. The police under strict orders to do nothing, merely covered themselves from the barrage of rocks, and slowly moved backwards from the rioters. Democrat Mayor Rawlings then said >>> “I made it very clear that I work with the police and instructed them to do everything that they could to make sure that the protesters were able to exercise their right to free speech. It’s a very delicate balancing act. Because while we try to make sure that they were protected from the cars and other things that were going on, we also gave those who wished to destroy, space to do that as well."
This will forever remain in the hall of fame of Democrat crime lunacy in America.
View attachment 660117 View attachment 660122View attachment 660118
6. Portland, OR - loon Democrat mayor Ted Wheeler allowed riot goons to run wild, handstrapping police. He even joined the rioters at one point when the rioting was so bad the cops had to resort to using tear gas, Wheeler himself getting tear gassed in the crowd. A few decades ago, if we would have suggested this might happen, they would have sent us to a nuthouse.
7. In 20 cities that defunded their police , of course on orders from Democrats, CRIME skyrocketed to record levels.
![]()
A List Of Crime Spikes In Cities That Defunded The Police
www.upward.news
8. In San Francisco, criminal loving DA Chesa Boudin got yanked out of his job by voters who recalled him 61-39%. In Los Angeles, another DA more protective of criminals than the public he's supposed to protect, is under extreme criticism.
Progressive Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon is facing mounting efforts to oust him amid outrage that his “reckless” policies left a violent gangbanger free to gun down two cops.
The woke prosecutor — already facing recall efforts — was blamed for cop-killer Justin Flores, 35, being free when he gunned down El Monte police Cpl. Michael Paredes and Officer Joseph Santana on Tuesday.
The felon — who had his gang allegiance tattooed on his face — was free even though he was accused of breaking his probation by illegally carrying a gun.
![]()
Woke Los Angeles DA George Gascon blamed for shooting deaths of two cops
The woke prosecutor — already facing recall efforts — was blamed for cop-killer Justin Flores being free when he gunned down two officers.nypost.com
An indictment by Democrats, is called a clown circus. The OP is far more damning.Really ?
View attachment 670362