2. The Left has a less than original playbook.
When they recognized that the public recognized the truth of the Clinton rape history, they marched out some fake scenario to charge the same against Trump.
Exactly how do you judge the 'Clinton rape history' to be true while you judge the charges against Trump to be fake? Do you use the same scale of justice or do you have your finger on the scale?
1. Every single thing a Democrat says is a lie.
"Lie of the Year: 'If you like your health care plan, you can keep it"
2. "A woman who accused Donald Trump of raping her two decades ago when she was a 13-year-old aspiring teen model has again dropped a federal lawsuit over the alleged assaults."
Woman suing Trump over alleged teen rape drops suit, again
You: "When they recognized that the public recognized the truth of the Clinton rape history, they marched out some fake scenario to charge the same against Trump."
The president has also been accused of sexual harassment or assault by at least 16 women.
Bill Clinton has been publicly accused of sexual misconduct by three women.
Why do you only focus on Clinton? The obvious answer is that you don't really care about women or about sexual misconduct but only about scoring political points.
Sexual misconduct is not a political issue, it is a cultural one and until it can be talked about without the political baggage people like yourself attach to it, it will always be a problem for women.
"Why do you only focus on Clinton?"
Because the Democrat elites are now admitting what the Right has said for decades.
Bill Clinton is a rapist.
1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.
Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.
2. But the trained seals are still denying!!!!
See it here:
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
and here:
DEM REP Waters: Trump investigation underway evidence not required for impeachment
and here:
DEM REP Waters: Trump investigation underway evidence not required for impeachment
and here:
Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…
It's really panicville for these half-heads.....
3. Here is the NYSlimes, acknowledging that they have to admit the truth about the rapist:
NYTimes: a day late and a dollar short...
"But with Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, we know what happened: A president being sued for sexual harassment tried to buy off a mistress-turned-potential-witness with White House favors, and then committed perjury serious enough to merit disbarment. Which also brought forward a compelling allegation from Juanita Broaddrick that the president had raped her.
The longer I spent with these old stories, the more I came back to a question: If exploiting a willing intern is a serious enough abuse of power to warrant resignation, why is obstructing justice in a sexual harassment case not serious enough to warrant impeachment? Especially when the behavior is part of a longstanding pattern that also may extend to rape? Would any feminist today hesitate to take a similar opportunity to remove a predatory studio head or C.E.O.?
...the most important escalators were the Democrats. They had an opportunity, with Al Gore waiting in the wings, to show a predator the door and establish some moral common ground for a polarizing country.
And what they did instead — turning their party into an accessory to Clinton’s appetites, shamelessly
abandoning feminist principle, smearing victims and blithely ignoring his most credible accuser, all
because Republicans funded the investigations and they’re prudes and it’s all just Sexual McCarthyism — feels in the cold clarity of hindsight like a great act of partisan deformation."
Opinion | What if Ken Starr Was Right?
And pinning the tail on the Democrat donkey:
"....turning their party into an accessory to Clinton’s appetites, shamelessly
abandoning feminist principle, smearing victims and blithely ignoring his most credible accuser, ..."
So....as the saying goes.....
Time Wounds All Heels
Now....isn't it time for you to admit that you're a dunce???