Considering that even Ken Starr believes he was wrong in his persecution of the Clintons, an opinion piece in a tabloid newspaper is of no value.
Furthermore, in her sworn Affidavit, Juanita Broaddrick denied Clinton raped her and requested that she be allowed to live in peace. At the time of the incident, she was married to one man and having an affair with another. She told them both that Bill Clinton raped her. Was that just to explain the āmouseā on her lip?
Broadderick then publically denied Clinton raped her to the press, in TV interviews, and in her sworn Affidavit. She also volunteered to work on several of his political campaigns. Volunteered? Who volunteers to help their rapist win ever higher political offices.
I donāt know what happened in that hotel room and neither do you. But I can see why Broaddrick would lie to both of the men in her life about what happened. The woman has proven to be an unreliable witness at best, changing her story to suit the occasion, but she did not publically cry rape until Starr and the FBI threatened to throw her in jail if she didnāt.
And here is another Leftwing organ admitting the truth:
"Clinton Is Guilty:
Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity. That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators. (At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.)
She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges."
Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?
After all your years of lies?
Really hurts, huh?
Whoās lying? Hard to tell. And your little synopsis ignores Ken Starrās threat of charges if she didnāt recant.
Youāre cherry picking your facts here, leaving out her marriage and affair - which is motive to lie to both those men. Youāre also leaving out her subsequent volunteer work on Bill Clintonās political campaigns.
Her volunteering to work on Bill Clintonās behalf is the biggest red flag in her story, other than she didnāt accuse Clinton of rape until after she was threatened with perjury charges. None of Roy Mooreās accusers worked to get him elected to any job.
I know of women who have worked at paid jobs with those who raped them. It didnāt end well. I know of NO ONE who volunteered to help their rapist do anything, much less run for public office.
So between the ever changing narrative, the threat of charges hanging over her head, and her proven record of being a liar and a cheat, Iām not buying it.
1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.
Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.
You, a total dunce, are still fighting the war you've lost.
2. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?
The New York Times
MSNBC
The Atlantic
Slate
3. On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....you.....who can't keep up with the program.
What utter bullshit. Broaddrick was the only woman to accuse Clinton of rape and only after being threatened with jail if she didnāt. Lewinsky and Flowers were willing participants. Jones and Willey turned him down and he didnāt rape either of them.
Paula Jones simply wanted an apology for being slandered in a magazine article but Republicans manufactured the whole āsexual harassmentā case because thatās all they had to go after him with. The judge threw the case out - with prejudice which was just short of labelling it āmalicious prosecutionā.
Jones was out through the wringer for four years at the end of which she got $200,000 - or $50,000 per year, and no apology. The Republican Party lawyerās kept the rest.
Bill Clinton is an opportunist, and an adulterer but the consistent thread in all of his advances was that he did take āNoā for an answer.
Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
CLINTON'S ROGUES GALLERY:
And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax."
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time - Breitbart
Everybody know that Bill Clinton is a rapist.
And,now, everybody knows what a low-life you are, too.
