Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 19,285
- 5,678
- 265
So was CHAZ/CHOP and the BLM riotsJ6 was no protest.
It was an attack on democracy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So was CHAZ/CHOP and the BLM riotsJ6 was no protest.
It was an attack on democracy
Of course not and that's not what happened here. How many people were shot by police when the rioters tried to get Trump in 2016?Answer the question.
So you would be ok with allowing violent rioters through barricades to get to Trump, right?Of course not and that's not what happened here.
You didn't answer the question, how many were shot when they had to whisk Trump off to safety in 2016?So you would be ok with allowing violent rioters through barricades to get to Trump, right?
I have no problem stopping violent rioters from getting to our elected officials. How about you?
How many of them broke into a barricaded part of the building?You didn't answer the question, how many were shot when they had to whisk Trump off to safety in 2016?
How many were killed by police?How many of them broke into a barricaded part of the building?
The FBI knew there would be trouble but did not tell the Capitol Police.
Zero because none of them broke into the building, none of them were a threat to get to our elected officials, and none of them broke through a barricade that was the last line of defense.How many were killed by police?
The damage was immense and the danger was imminent for police and elected officials. You are saying police should have killed some of the protesters? It certainly would have stopped them like the murder of Ashley Babbitt. You're right it's not complicated.Zero because none of them broke into the building, none of them were a threat to get to our elected officials, and none of them broke through a barricade that was the last line of defense.
It’s not complicated.
No, it wasn’t. Nobody got inside the building.The damage was immense and the danger was imminent for police and elected officials.
You are advocating shooting protesters by turning a blind eye to Ashley Babbitt's murder. Unless of course it's your side that is doing the damage and killing, they do call your position hypocritical. What a weak person you are. Remember when they trapped policemen inside of their Precinct and tried to burn it down? Remember When your side attacked the Federal Building in portland? You are saying that we should have shot those people right?No, it wasn’t. Nobody got inside the building.
You’re not very good at this, lol.
Now if it were up to you and a violent mob had broken into the building and past barricades to get to Trump, should they have just let them through or should they have stopped the rioters by any means necessary? You won’t answer.
Zero because none of them broke into the building, none of them were a threat to get to our elected officials, and none of them broke through a barricade that was the last line of defense.
You didn’t answer. That’s what I thought.You are advocating shooting protesters by turning a blind eye to Ashley Babbitt's murder. Unless of course it's your side that is doing the damage and killing, they do call your position hypocritical. What a weak person you are. Remember when they trapped policemen inside of their Precinct and tried to burn it down? Remember When your side attacked the Federal Building in portland? You are saying that we should have shot those people right?
Link.Bullshit.
- The protest was orchestrated to be a riot by the FBI, Cap police and government as grounds to hang over Trump's head.
You didn’t answer. That’s what I thought.
Your question is based on a false narrative. You're comparing something that didn't happen with a hypothetical. Try to be more honest. Your credibility really lacks when you go advocating for the murder of protesters. Do betterYou didn’t answer. That’s what I thought.
A hypothetical is a false narrative? LoL.Your question is based on a false narrative. You're comparing something that didn't happen with a hypothetical.
Your narrative about what Ashley Babbitt was doing at the Capitol to get her murdered is false. Your hypothetical is comparing the Riots of 2016 to what happened at the Capitol. You really seem to me to be a bloodthirsty heathen who advocates for killing protesters if they don't think like you do.A hypothetical is a false narrative? LoL.
You’re running away from answering because it exposes how full of shit you are.
My hypothetical has nothing to do with the riots of 2016. It’s a fucking hypothetical. You’re just running away from answering it because it exposes how full of shit you are.Your narrative about what Ashley Babbitt was doing at the Capitol to get her murdered is false. Your hypothetical is comparing the Riots of 2016 to what happened at the Capitol.
I answered your stupid question. You're just too dense to have understand what I said. Full of shit is someone who thinks it's okay to kill protesters. Especially if they are MAGA.My hypothetical has nothing to do with the riots of 2016. It’s a fucking hypothetical. You’re just running away from answering it because it exposes how full of shit you are.
They're still trying to downplay the Insurrection. Somehow they don't realize what that says.My hypothetical has nothing to do with the riots of 2016. It’s a fucking hypothetical. You’re just running away from answering it because it exposes how full of shit you are.