Democrats on the House Oversight and Government... voted with Republicans... to hold former President Clinton and Hillary in Contempt of Congress

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
28,559
Reaction score
57,779
Points
2,290
Good!


However, it is doubtful that a grand jury made up of Democrats, in an overwhelming Democrat city, that is Washington, D.C., will indict.


And even if an indictment can be attained, less chance a trial jury would convict in that city.



In a delicious turn of events, House Democrats have voted with Republicans to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress over the Jeffrey Epstein saga.

Democrats opened this box, and now Democrats can suck on it.

"Nine Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee voted with Republicans Wednesday to recommend holding former President Bill Clinton in contempt of Congress," writes an obviously heartbroken, far-left Politico.

The contempt charge is for "defying a subpoena to testify as part of the panel's investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."

Three Democrats on the committee also voted to hold two-time presidential loser Hillary Clinton in contempt for defying a subpoena.

Now that both contempt charges have passed the committee, the next step is to give the full House a vote. If a majority of the House backs the contempt charge, which it almost certainly will, the issue will then be turned over to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution, which could mean prison for Bill and Hill.


...

Former Trump officials Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro both went to prison for ignoring a congressional subpoena.

...



 
When you hold Hillary accountable, you hold Trump accountable.

What do you suppose she will say under oath?
 
I guess the Clintons figure it's better to be held in contempt of congress, which is nothing, than it is to be held accountable for all their crimes. Contempt of congress is a joke charge, used by politicians to avoid real accountability.
 
This is how much EVERYONE, regardless of party, wants the Epstein files released and the demonic pedos infesting our gubmint and culture exposed.
Hard to argue against releasing all the files. The issue can then be settled.
 
There's also the fact that excessively stupid demoncrats (which comprises most of them) are hoping against hope that one -and only one- name is featured prominently in them.
Yep. That being said it needs to be dealt with.
 
By refusing testimony on Epstein, the Clintons are in no position to be commenting on Trump and Epstein.
 
When you hold Hillary accountable, you hold Trump accountable.

What do you suppose she will say under oath?

Why don't you tell us since you obviously know.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom