Democrats mum on gun control after Charlie Kirk assassination

[Hollie]

It has been striking that we haven't heard the screeching cat calls on the left for "more gun control" in the wake of the Charlie Kirk killing. The assassination culture of the left seems to have understood that an armed subculture of their "furry" sexual deviant freaks and angry tranny misfits are a resource for the Democrat party.

A loyal collection of Jihad misfits seems to be a resource the democrats wont let go of.

Democrats mum on gun control after Charlie Kirk assassination

Democrats condemn violence but stay silent on gun control after Kirk assassination

www.conservativenewsdaily.net

The article discusses the reactions of prominent Democratic leaders following the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk.While these figures, including Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Gavin Newsom, and Gabrielle Giffords, expressed condolences and condemned political violence, notably none called for new gun control measures in response to this incident.This contrasts with their responses to other deadly shootings, where calls for gun reform were more common.

 

[Mack The Finger]

Global warming has rotted thier brains.

 

[kyzr]

Tyler Robinson used a typical 30-06 deer rifle, not a scary looking AR, aka a "weapon of war".
Neither was it a "mass casualty event" where many were shot.
They will wait for an event that fits their narrative before calling for more gun control.

 

[Nostra]

That's weird.

 

[ranfunck]

Tyler Robinson used a typical 30-06 deer rifle, not a scary looking AR, aka a "weapon of war".
Neither was it a "mass casualty event" where many were shot.
They will wait for an event that fits their narrative before calling for more gun control.

They will stage an event that fits their narrative before calling for more gun control.

 

[JGalt]

Tyler Robinson used a typical 30-06 deer rifle, not a scary looking AR, aka a "weapon of war".
Neither was it a "mass casualty event" where many were shot.
They will wait for an event that fits their narrative before calling for more gun control.

Well that's weird. We won two world wars with many of what would be called a "deer rifle" these days: The Springfield 03A3 and Enfield P-1917. Of course we used M1-Garands in the same caliber in WW2, but they only held three more rounds than today's semi-auto Browning, Remington, or Winchester deer rifle.

I guess Democrats loved gun control before they figured out how they can be used against people they hate.

 

[kyzr]

Well that's weird. We won two world wars with many of what would be called a "deer rifle" these days: The Springfield 03A3 and Enfield P-1917. Of course we used M1-Garands in the same caliber in WW2, but they only held three more rounds than today's semi-auto Browning, Remington, or Winchester deer rifle.
I guess Democrats loved gun control before they figured out how they can be used against people they hate.

I shot an M1-Garand. Tricky to load, can really smack a finger.
Democrats pushed gun control, then when in power wanted 80,000 new IRS agents "willing to kill".

IRS Deletes Requirement That New Agents Be Willing to Use 'Deadly Force'

Backlash against IRS hiring practices follows criticism alleging that tens of thousands of new agents will be hired and go after poorer Americans.

www.newsweek.com

 

[JGalt]

I shot an M1-Garand. Tricky to load, can really smack a finger.
Democrats pushed gun control, then when in power wanted 80,000 new IRS agents "willing to kill".

IRS Deletes Requirement That New Agents Be Willing to Use 'Deadly Force'

Backlash against IRS hiring practices follows criticism alleging that tens of thousands of new agents will be hired and go after poorer Americans.

www.newsweek.com

I've heard they can be a ***** if you get your thumb between the bolt and the chamber, but I'll make an admission here: I once bought a Korean re-work Garand at a pawn shop years ago. Never shot it and only had it for a couple days before I traded it for a POS scoped Ruger Mini-14 that wouldn't even do 4" groups at 100 yards. I have shot a Garand a couple times while standing in for someone in our local American Legion/VFW honor guard for funerals, but they were just blanks.

M1 carbines are another story. I've own about 6 of them over the years and even worked up some handloads, but always ended up trading them off.

 

[1srelluc]

You do not hear jack about it every time a right-leaner is a victim or later when the perp turns out to be a leftist.

I guess that's why they usually try to go with it early then so silent later if it's unclear at first.

 

[Natural Citizen]

It has been striking that we haven't heard the screeching cat calls on the left for "more gun control" in the wake of the Charlie Kirk killing.

Yeah, I think the Republicans are carrying that water now.


For example...

We see why your unhinged tranny heroes might be best excluded from firearm ownership as the mentally unstable are.

Going for selective government infringment of the 2nd amendment it looks like.

Not much difference between big-government statists in the grand scheme of things, really. Never really has been. Whether one adops an R or a D is of no meaningful consequence in that regard.

 

[1srelluc]

Yeah, I think the Republicans are carrying that water now.


For example...



Going for selective infringment of the 2nd amendment it looks like.

Not much difference between big-government statists, really. Never really has been...

Go ahead and check the non-binary box on a 4473 and see if a shop will sell a gun to you.
If you can't figure out if you are male or female it shows up as mental illness to most folks.
Just because the .gov says they can it's their shop, their rules.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Just because the .gov says they can it's their shop, their rules.

No, it's the constitution that says they can. Natural rights do not come from the government.

Speaking of that, background checks are a violation of the 1st, 5th, and 10th Amendments.

Firstly, background checks are a violation of the 1st Amendment because it compels Individuals to speak and to provide information about themselves in order to acquire a gun.

Secondly, background checks violate the 5th Amendment because Individuals are compelled to provide evidence against themselves in order to acquire a gun.

Additionally, background checks violate the 10th Amendment because the requirement to provide this information is not something that is explicitely stated as a power of the federal government in the Constitution.

If anyone had that power it would be the states and local government, but even the states have their own 2nd amendments.

That's what I think in general about your ''application'' to exercise one's 2nd Amendment right.

And I'm pretty sure that the Framers are on my side of the argument.

 

[Natural Citizen]

But anyway.

I think I answered the OP's question sufficiently.

Calls for gun control/2nd amendment restrictions are still being made,

It's just mainly the red blips carrying that water now.

Basically the big-government red blips and the big-government blue blips just take turns trying to whittle away at the constitution a little bit at a time as the changing administrations pass off the baton to one another, each fulfilling ther own role in the gambit, while pretending they're different than one another in some trivial way.

It's been that way for a very long time.

Proceed...

 

[Dante]

It has been striking that we haven't heard the screeching cat calls on the left for "more gun control" in the wake of the Charlie Kirk killing. The assassination culture of the left seems to have understood that an armed subculture of their "furry" sexual deviant freaks and angry tranny misfits are a resource for the Democrat party.

A loyal collection of Jihad misfits seems to be a resource the democrats wont let go of.

Democrats mum on gun control after Charlie Kirk assassination

Democrats condemn violence but stay silent on gun control after Kirk assassination

www.conservativenewsdaily.net

The article discusses the reactions of prominent Democratic leaders following the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk.While these figures, including Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Gavin Newsom, and Gabrielle Giffords, expressed condolences and condemned political violence, notably none called for new gun control measures in response to this incident.This contrasts with their responses to other deadly shootings, where calls for gun reform were more common.

FAKE NEWS ALERT!

Made up narrative

 

[Dante]

But anyway.

I think I answered the OP's question sufficiently.

Calls for gun control/2nd amendment restrictions are still being made,

It's just mainly the red blips carrying that water now.

Basically the big-government red blips and the big-government blue blips just take turns trying to whittle away at the constitution a little bit at a time as the changing administrations pass off the baton to one another, each fulfilling ther own role in the gambit, while pretending they're different than one another in some trivial way.

It's been that way for a very long time.

Proceed...

Hell has frozen over



I finally agree with you

 

[Natural Citizen]

Hell has frozen over



I finally agree with you

Yeah, but you likely do not agree with my support for logical solutions which would actually deter quite a bit of these shootings.

For instance...

Congressman Thomas Massie has introduced a bill to repeal the federal Gun-Free school Zones Act...

Congressman Massie Introduces Bill to Repeal Federal Gun-Free School Zones Act

massie.house.gov

Additionally...

Rep. Massie Introduces National Constitutional Carry Act to Protect Right to Carry Firearms in All States

massie.house.gov

Unfortunately, the President and many in the Republican Party want to kick strict constitutionalists who intrduce reasonable, constitutional solutions out of the party.

For whatever reason, they choose rather to normalize selective restriction the Individual's natural 2nd amendment right.

And that's a rabbit hole that leads to a very, very dark place.

 

[Dante]

Yeah, but you likely do not agree with my support for logical solutions which would actually deter quite a bit of these shootings.

Wrong

 

[Natural Citizen]

The red blips seem to have received the baton from the blue blips to start working on normalizing the notion of restricting the 1st Amendment, too, but I think there's also a foreign aspect driving that particular gambit. Which compounds things a bit.

Calls for restricting the 4th Amendment will likely be next on their chopping block after that, but marching orders lto normalize the notion of restricting the 4th ikely won't come for a short while. Depends on how much they think they can get away with in terms of normalizing selective restriction of the 1st and 2nd Amendments. But just wait for it, you'll see calls for that on the board at some point here in the future.

This shit's just too predictable.

That's an entirely different discussion, but directly relevant in scope, none the less.

You learn a lot about consistency or otherwise the lack thereof in terms of professed principles by just observing people and the flow of dialogue, really.

Of course, eventually the blue blips will be back in control at some point and then the red blips who are designated with carrying the water now will pass the baton back off to the blue blips for the next leg of the race to our serfdom and then the red blips will be right back to their disingenuous finger wagging routine again, talking about, 'hey, my name's muffin, I dindu nuffin'' the same way they do regarding fiscal matters. Heh heh.

It's like a circus ride, man. One might logically consider wising up and recogniizing that it's the same old ride just taking you around in an endless loop over and over again and maybe get off the fukin thing, but I don't see it happening any time soon.

Sincerely,
Dave

 

[Natural Citizen]

Wrong

Well that's good.

 

[Dante]

Well that's good.

Neither good nor bad