Democrats keep saying "no scotus until the people decide"

[Moonglow]

hmmm

didn't they have the opposite opinion in 2016?

Yeah, so that makes the gop look like they have done it also. Oh the shock!

 

[kaz]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

I might agree with your argument, in principle. But Donald lost the popular vote. So the people didn't decide, the electoral college decided. I think the real truth in all of this is that our system of government needs a huge makeover, because our procedural processes have become diseased.

Been doing it this way since the country started. The only reason Democrats don't like the EC now is because they can't win. So instead of trying to win by the rules, now they want to change the rules so they can win. It's just like you leftists said when Kerry lost. He was ahead in the exit polling samples, so then you were crying we should change our election system to exit polling to determine the winner.

We can't keep changing the rules every time you people lose.

Leftists were downplaying the PV and crowing about the EC in 2012 because Obama won by a bigger margin than he did the PV. They're just liars who make it up as they go. And they're shameless. They will flip on it in a heartbeat when it benefits them. Democrats aren't about anything but winning. When they win a poll, we're a democracy. When they lose a poll, then run to the courts for a decree

 

[iceberg]

What did he say?

I don't remember exactly; you know how he dances around making a direct statement. But he's holding back for the ratings on Monday night at 9 p.m., dontcha know.

Oh come on now! You cannot remember what you are accusing him of?

I am not accusing him of anything.

So, since he didn’t say anything that you can actually remember I think you will see a white young catholic woman seated on the Supreme Court. Great news for women yes?

Okay, that's your wish, stick with it. We'll see, as the Great Orange Groper says.

i thought making fun of skn color was racism...

 

[kaz]

What did he say?

I don't remember exactly; you know how he dances around making a direct statement. But he's holding back for the ratings on Monday night at 9 p.m., dontcha know.

Oh come on now! You cannot remember what you are accusing him of?

I am not accusing him of anything.

So, since he didn’t say anything that you can actually remember I think you will see a white young catholic woman seated on the Supreme Court. Great news for women yes?

Okay, that's your wish, stick with it. We'll see, as the Great Orange Groper says.

You're so pathetic that you attack Trump for being a groper while you defend and vote for Slick and his hoe who assaulted innocent victims.

Consent is lost on you. I have a feeling that in your own life, your consent does matter

 

[kaz]

I don't remember exactly; you know how he dances around making a direct statement. But he's holding back for the ratings on Monday night at 9 p.m., dontcha know.

Oh come on now! You cannot remember what you are accusing him of?

I am not accusing him of anything.

So, since he didn’t say anything that you can actually remember I think you will see a white young catholic woman seated on the Supreme Court. Great news for women yes?

I'm with AngryOldLady. I don't think Barrett is going to be the pick. Not just because of Roe v. Wade, but she has a short history on the bench. Not that Trump doesn't like her for those, just it would make the confirmation more difficult.

Kavanaugh has too much of the American traitor Roberts has. I'm pulling for Kethledge. Go Blue!

Well, they confirmed her to the seventh circuit so it will be hard to deny her credentials!

They don't care about facts, they care about winning.

I like her, I'm not slamming her, I'm just saying the attacks they will use. And the left is ultra misogynistic. She's a woman and not a Democrat, the vitriol will be vile to the extreme.

And while I may not agree with you on being pro-life, I do agree with you that Roe v. Wade should be overturned as the made up law Constitutional abomination that it is. Abortion is not in the Constitution. Abortion is justly a State issue.

I'm just saying that the other two are good also and with the fake Republicans like Collins and Murkowski, confirmation will be a lot easier for them

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Been doing it this way since the country started. The only reason Democrats don't like the EC now is because they can't win.

Pay attention, you dumbass. My statements have nothing to do with whether the electoral college system is an appropriate mechanism for choosing the President. The question is whether the election reflects the People's choice for Supreme Court nominations.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

I might agree with your argument, in principle. But Donald lost the popular vote. So the people didn't decide, the electoral college decided. I think the real truth in all of this is that our system of government needs a huge makeover, because our procedural processes have become diseased.

The people never decide. States decide and the electoral college is in place so that the States do decide. This is not a democracy. This is not mob rule. This is a republic.

So, getting back to the subject at hand, you disagree with the OP? Voters did not choose on the courts. Glad we agree.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

Lmao! The people have not yet spoken for this term. Dozens of seats are going to change hands, those voters need to be counted.

. Dozens of seats are going to change hands, those voters need to be counted.

You're dreaming

better than the nightmare republicans and trump are giving us now

Awe poor child. The big ole meanie is give you nightmares.

Perhaps you need a new safety blanket?

 

[edward37]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

Lmao! The people have not yet spoken for this term. Dozens of seats are going to change hands, those voters need to be counted.

. Dozens of seats are going to change hands, those voters need to be counted.

You're dreaming

better than the nightmare republicans and trump are giving us now

Awe poor child. The big ole meanie is give you nightmares.

Perhaps you need a new safety blanket?

With the us against the world attitude you trump and your republican friends have you'll be needing more than that blanket,,,,,,,but you can always count on your commie friend Putin

 

[Flash]

One of the main reasons that Trump got elected is the possibility that he would replace several Supremes.

The people hath spoken.

Get over it Moon Bat snowflakes.

 

[rightwinger]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

Both parties used to put politics aside when it came to Supreme Court Justices
They deferred to the President in his choice unless there were specific critical objections

Republicans changed that process to where an opposing candidate will not even be considered while they hold the Senate. They invoked the nuclear option where only a majority is needed to confirm

Now they get to live under the same rules

 

[WEATHER53]

Popular vote does not win Presidency and public does not pick Supreme Court
Inconvenient facts in an emotional fantasy world is tough but real and necessary

 

[Crepitus]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

Lmao! The people have not yet spoken for this term. Dozens of seats are going to change hands, those voters need to be counted.

. Dozens of seats are going to change hands, those voters need to be counted.

You're dreaming

Nope.

 

[Crepitus]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

Lmao! The people have not yet spoken for this term. Dozens of seats are going to change hands, those voters need to be counted.

The voters did decide and put Trump and the Republicans in power.

Obama didn't have the Senate votes to confirm Garland, Trump does have the votes to confirm his pick.

It's pretty simple. What you have is in medical terms called butt hurt. It's complicated by that you also have a case of spoiled child syndrome.

I'll let this guy explain it to you

‘Elections have consequences’

At the time you theives used this excuse the voters had decided and put president Obama in office, and he won without Russian help and even got the popular vote too.

 

[Aldo Raine]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

It was stupid when they did it in 2016. There is no reason to think it is less stupid now!

 

[kaz]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

Lmao! The people have not yet spoken for this term. Dozens of seats are going to change hands, those voters need to be counted.

The voters did decide and put Trump and the Republicans in power.

Obama didn't have the Senate votes to confirm Garland, Trump does have the votes to confirm his pick.

It's pretty simple. What you have is in medical terms called butt hurt. It's complicated by that you also have a case of spoiled child syndrome.

I'll let this guy explain it to you

‘Elections have consequences’

At the time you theives used this excuse the voters had decided and put president Obama in office, and he won without Russian help and even got the popular vote too.

I voted for Johnson, I'm a libertarian, moron.

And Hillary cost Hillary the election. You picked a shitty candidate. Get over yourself

 

[Silhouette]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

They already decided. Elections have consequences. Trump would not be president nor would the Senate be majority red if the dems hadn't pushed Obama to force little girls in public schools to share their showers, locker rooms and bathrooms with deranged boys. It's that simple. The Rust Belt middle dems had had enough unchecked insanity, just after their states were forced to allow motherless/fatherless marriage contracts to be "valid", by at least one USSC Justice who openly advertised her bias for gay marriage weeks before that power-grab (I guess they technically called it "an impartial hearing on the facts"...just the ones they would allow while barring others like testimony from kids raised in gay homes that were saying they're not right for kids...).

The fringe left in the democratic party slit it's own throat. Enjoy the fruits of your unrestrained fascism via Obama you friggin' whack jobs.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

Lmao! The people have not yet spoken for this term. Dozens of seats are going to change hands, those voters need to be counted.

The voters did decide and put Trump and the Republicans in power.

Obama didn't have the Senate votes to confirm Garland, Trump does have the votes to confirm his pick.

It's pretty simple. What you have is in medical terms called butt hurt. It's complicated by that you also have a case of spoiled child syndrome.

I'll let this guy explain it to you

‘Elections have consequences’

At the time you theives used this excuse the voters had decided and put president Obama in office, and he won without Russian help and even got the popular vote too.

I voted for Johnson, I'm a libertarian, moron.

And Hillary cost Hillary the election. You picked a shitty candidate. Get over yourself

Voted for Walker here. Am eager to see how things pan out over the next year though. Last winter was abnormally busy in my business after Trumps election. If it continues this fall and winter he will likely get my vote in 2020 if he runs again.

 

[Crepitus]

Thing is the people already decided when the GOP hijacked the process under Obama. Like that act or not it put the direction of the court FIRMLY in the hands of the voter.
Voters chose and the left lost so why hold up more nominees when the people have already spoken?

And spare me the popular vote or Russia Russia Russia bullshit.

Lmao! The people have not yet spoken for this term. Dozens of seats are going to change hands, those voters need to be counted.

The voters did decide and put Trump and the Republicans in power.

Obama didn't have the Senate votes to confirm Garland, Trump does have the votes to confirm his pick.

It's pretty simple. What you have is in medical terms called butt hurt. It's complicated by that you also have a case of spoiled child syndrome.

I'll let this guy explain it to you

‘Elections have consequences’

At the time you theives used this excuse the voters had decided and put president Obama in office, and he won without Russian help and even got the popular vote too.

I voted for Johnson, I'm a libertarian, moron.

And Hillary cost Hillary the election. You picked a shitty candidate. Get over yourself

I wrote in "none of the above". Not a fan of Clinton, Johnson is a drug addled moron, trump is a low iq bully, stein is just a wacko. I wish Deez Nuts had been on the ballot here, I woulda voted for him. The last presidential election was a bad joke.

 

[Manonthestreet]