I have no fking idea. but if he illegally used tax payer money for his own personal gain, then i want his ass in jail. You can still vote for him. I don't see how it nullifies your vote. explain that to me.
yes he did. he proved that our intelligence agencies spied on americans. that's worse than anything putin could ever do.
so you agree the agencies spied on americans. Nothing can be worse than that.
Your willful ignorance is astounding. Have you found that walking around with your head up your ass has worked for you as a life strategy? So far I'm not impressed with your lack of understanding of how the justice system works. Perhaps you should use the google machine on the interwebs and educate yourself before making yourself look like an idiot.
Soooo.....you didn't watch the proceedings in the House? Dolt.
Nice try but you failed to answer anything.
Sooooooooo.... you didn't either else you would know that the Republicans were there & could ask questions. Republicans wanted witnesses that had nothing to add or to try to push the investigation to others. Like the whistleblower, only to find out his identity. Biden & Biden's son, who had nothing to do with Trump's bribe attempt.
a juror isn't allowed to ask for witnesses. when did that change in our due process system? you're merely mistaken friend. Jurors are to be impartial on the evidence presented by a prosecutor. I dare you to show me where it is different. When the prosecutor states he needs additional witnesses, tells me he doesn't believe in his own evidence. Why should I? In fact, after schitt's making that statement, any senator that votes for the articles is not acting impartial.
It was discussed before the Senate. Schumer made motions for certain witnesses. He is a juror. Republicans voted them down, they are jurors. I guess that makes your post dumber than shit.
So "the everyone does it" approach.
too fking funny, the fact is, why do the left need more witnesses? isn't their presented articles overwhelming? why then would they need more witnesses? fk anything about the repubs and that they weren't allowed to bring in witnesses. you know that's so. you know it. you can't make it so, no matter how many times you wish to say it. wrong. but what you can comment on is why there are witnesses needed by the left? OVERWHELMING those articles. Are those legitimate or not? wasn't there a vote? shouldn't the evidence stand as voted on?
Evidence of what? Making leftist traitors cry?
he's a juror, he doesn't get to ask for witnesses. I said that already. where do jurors get to ask for witnesses? Isn't the evidence within the articles that were presented? Are you saying the left fked up? just say it if you think they need additional witnesses.
BTW, the fact that schitt's is asking to bring in additional witnesses is a white flag!! Surrender that he didn't do his own job. too fking funny. now, he wants to play the shame game, when he is the one shamed. by his own mthr fking words. hahaahhaahahahahaha
