Democrats Demanding Trump Break Numerous Laws and Regulations

[Rawley]

1. They should make them permanent now.
2. They should change their minds. Letting the subsidies expire is bad news for millions of Americans.

Well, your cult itself disagreed.

 

[Marener]

Well, your cult itself disagreed.

Dems are voting in unison on this.

 

[konradv]

Is a political movement supposed to be led by the Bible? I mean, that would be great, but I could hear the squeals now about the theocracy America is turning into.

It doesn’t have to be religious, just humane.

 

[hadit]

It doesn’t have to be religious, just humane.

That's not what you said here:

"Why does MAGA want to starve the poor? Jesus believed in feeding the hungry."

 

[konradv]

That's not what you said here:

"Why does MAGA want to starve the poor? Jesus believed in feeding the hungry."

I said MAGA wasn’t being humane. What’s the problem?

 

[hadit]

I said MAGA wasn’t being humane. What’s the problem?

You set it in the context of what Jesus said, thus saying that they should be led by God, which is the definition of a theocracy. Now, don't get me wrong, this country being led by God would be totally awesome, but yes, there would be loud screams about it being a theocracy and double plus ungood and all manner of bad.

 

[konradv]

You set it in the context of what Jesus said, thus saying that they should be led by God, which is the definition of a theocracy. Now, don't get me wrong, this country being led by God would be totally awesome, but yes, there would be loud screams about it being a theocracy and double plus ungood and all manner of bad.

I’m just asking MAGA to be humane. That doesn’t have to be religious, though I thought that’s what MAGA liked.

 

[Rawley]

Dems are voting in unison on this.

They voted in unison to cancel the subsidies next month.

 

[hadit]

I’m just asking MAGA to be humane. That doesn’t have to be religious, though I thought that’s what MAGA liked.

They're a political organization, not a religious one.

 

[Marener]

They voted in unison to cancel the subsidies next month.

And now they’re in unison to extend the subsidies. Welcome to 2025.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

You guys have to be pretty ******* disgusting to threaten stores who want to help poor people have enough food to feed their families.

Just gross.

Are you counting Food Stamp Fraud in your post? Are you counting illegals receiving EBT?

 

[Rawley]

And now they’re in unison to extend the subsidies. Welcome to 2025.

No you are not. At least three of your cult have already broken with the herd

Have any of you bothered asked why them why they voted to sunset the subsidies next month?

 

[Marener]

No you are not. At least three of your cult have already broken with the herd

Have any of you bothered asked why them why they voted to sunset the subsidies next month?

I imagine it had something to do with reconciliation. Kind of like how republicans voted to sunset their tax cuts in 2017.

I don’t see why it matters. That was then. This is now.

 

[theHawk]

You guys have to be pretty ******* disgusting to threaten stores who want to help poor people have enough food to feed their families.

Just gross.

Umm, it’s the law, jackass. And it was passed by Democraps.

 

[Rawley]

I imagine it had something to do with reconciliation. Kind of like how republicans voted to sunset their tax cuts in 2017.

I don’t see why it matters. That was then. This is now.

It matters because your cult has chosen to shut down the gvt and inflict as much pain on Americans as possible. And they are lying about it with every breath to America.

 

[excalibur]

There’s nothing stopping Republicans from agreeing to help Americans with expanded ACA subsidies.

But again, helping Americans isn’t really their style when it’s not also somehow connected to padding the wallets of the elites.

Why are ACA subsidies needed? Øbama promised a $2500 savings, you can keep your Doctor, you can keep your plan.

Only he lied, and he knew he was lying. Insurance rates have skyrocketed, since Øbama (doesn't and didn't) care became law.

So now some people, some well enough off to take early retirement, get subsidies for the failed ACA.

The ACA is a failure, period. And likely designed to be a failure.

 

[excalibur]

In other words, the Senate isn’t willing to pass it.

You can’t pass what isn’t up for a vote.

Republicans have voted for it, but they need 60 votes in the Senate, and Republicans only have 53 Senate seats.

The Schumer Shutdown at work.

 

[excalibur]

The ACA, a total failure.

Thread 'The #ACA was sold to the American people on false premises.The Falsehoods of Obamacare: 12 Broken Promises, Seven Million Canceled Plans, ...'

Oct 15, 2024

As many predicted when, against the will of the People, Congress passed this mess.

Recall that Senator Feinstein said the phone calls to her office were 90 to 1 against, but she voted for this mess anyway.

Yeah, they don't care about you, Democrats are all about control.

• excalibur
• Replies: 17
• Forum: Election 2024

 

[Concerned American]

Of course it isn’t. There’s no constitutional right to tax exempt status.

As there is no constitutional right to demand that the gov't feed, clothe, house or provide medical care or insurance to the citizenry. LOL, now you're wanting to take away the tax exempt status of charities while advocating for FORCING taxpayers to provide the above mentioned benefits. You're twisting yourself into that familiar pretzel shape again.

 

[Marener]

Republicans have voted for it, but they need 60 votes in the Senate, and Republicans only have 53 Senate seats.

The Schumer Shutdown at work.

Sounds like they need to negotiate and compromise.