Democrats Counter With STEAL Act To Ban Voter ID

[Doc7505]

Democrats Counter With STEAL Act To Ban Voter ID​

Democrats Counter With STEAL Act To Ban Voter ID

WASHINGTON, D.C. — With debate ongoing over the Republican-proposed SAVE Act to shore up U.S. election integrity, Democrat lawmakers countered by proposing their own legislation, the STEAL Act, to ban voter ID in elections.

babylonbee.com

12 Feb 2026

With debate ongoing over the Republican-proposed SAVE Act to shore up U.S. election integrity, Democrat lawmakers countered by proposing their own legislation, the STEAL Act, to ban voter ID in elections.
The bill, which has the full title of Shield The Election From Legitimacy Act, would make it illegal for anyone to present valid identification when voting in an election, thereby preventing any safeguards against fraud from being put in place.
"This legislation is vital to the survival of our party," said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. "With Republicans seeking to discriminate against people by only allowing citizens to vote, they've left us no choice but to respond with our own bill that would ensure a complete lack of election integrity whatsoever. That's why we are proud to introduce the STEAL Act. This legislation will give the Democratic Party a bright and robust future for all elections."
Senate Democrats also championed the bill as the nation's last and best hope to subvert election security moving forward. "Without this law, we will be stuck with legitimate democracy," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. "I shudder to think of the level of election security that would be put in place if this legislation does not pass. Can you imagine an America where only people who are legally allowed to vote can cast their ballots? It's terrifying."
At publishing time, Democrats were reportedly working hard to stage a water main break in the Capitol to interrupt voting on the SAVE Act and allow more time for shenanigans.


Commentary:
With each day that goes by the thin line between satire and truth becomes smaller and smaller.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Voter ID is a voting rights issue because when someone votes twice or a non-citizen votes they are canceling out the vote of legitimate voters.
Voter ID protects your right to vote from voter fraud.
In effect the Democrats are fighting against Voting Rights.

 

[schmidlap]

Democrats Counter With STEAL Act To Ban Voter ID​

Democrats Counter With STEAL Act To Ban Voter ID

WASHINGTON, D.C. — With debate ongoing over the Republican-proposed SAVE Act to shore up U.S. election integrity, Democrat lawmakers countered by proposing their own legislation, the STEAL Act, to ban voter ID in elections.

babylonbee.com

12 Feb 2026

With debate ongoing over the Republican-proposed SAVE Act to shore up U.S. election integrity, Democrat lawmakers countered by proposing their own legislation, the STEAL Act, to ban voter ID in elections.
The bill, which has the full title of Shield The Election From Legitimacy Act, would make it illegal for anyone to present valid identification when voting in an election, thereby preventing any safeguards against fraud from being put in place.
"This legislation is vital to the survival of our party," said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. "With Republicans seeking to discriminate against people by only allowing citizens to vote, they've left us no choice but to respond with our own bill that would ensure a complete lack of election integrity whatsoever. That's why we are proud to introduce the STEAL Act. This legislation will give the Democratic Party a bright and robust future for all elections."
Senate Democrats also championed the bill as the nation's last and best hope to subvert election security moving forward. "Without this law, we will be stuck with legitimate democracy," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. "I shudder to think of the level of election security that would be put in place if this legislation does not pass. Can you imagine an America where only people who are legally allowed to vote can cast their ballots? It's terrifying."
At publishing time, Democrats were reportedly working hard to stage a water main break in the Capitol to interrupt voting on the SAVE Act and allow more time for shenanigans.


Commentary:
With each day that goes by the thin line between satire and truth becomes smaller and smaller.

Losers, paranoids and dumb folk attack American democracy, but the record shows elections have been extremely secure.

​

Looking at the seven closest states, we find for instance that in Arizona, Heritage had to go back 25 years, over which there were 36 elections held and 42,626,379 ballots cast, in order to come up with 36 cases of fraud. The percentage of fraudulent votes was a minuscule .0000845%, and no election outcome was altered by ballot fraud throughout that time period. In the highly contested state of Pennsylvania, Heritage data goes back 30 years and covers 32 elections with over 100 million votes cast and found only 39 cases of voter fraud. As the table indicates, this is the case with all the other states where the vote is likely to be close. There were a handful of reported cases of fraud amongst millions and millions of ballots cast, and none of them shifted the election outcome.​

​

Voter fraud is serious, which is why there are many protections built into the system to protect against fraud. In an effort to “pre-bunk” the inevitable accusations of fraud, election officials around the country are working hard to inform the voters on how voting actually works.​

​

And—in one of the least well-known aspects of the vote count—Democrats and Republicans have teams of lawyers, armed with depositions, that are allowed into the rooms where counting is going on. To assume massive amounts of voter fraud, you also have to assume that the Democrats or the Republicans have lawyers who are really dumb or just lazy, and neither is the case.​

​

How widespread is election fraud in the United States? Not very | Brookings

In swing states, reported cases of voter fraud amounts to less than 1%.

www.brookings.edu

​

 

[Hafar1014]

Losers, paranoids and dumb folk attack American democracy, but the record shows elections have been extremely secure.

​

Looking at the seven closest states, we find for instance that in Arizona, Heritage had to go back 25 years, over which there were 36 elections held and 42,626,379 ballots cast, in order to come up with 36 cases of fraud. The percentage of fraudulent votes was a minuscule .0000845%, and no election outcome was altered by ballot fraud throughout that time period. In the highly contested state of Pennsylvania, Heritage data goes back 30 years and covers 32 elections with over 100 million votes cast and found only 39 cases of voter fraud. As the table indicates, this is the case with all the other states where the vote is likely to be close. There were a handful of reported cases of fraud amongst millions and millions of ballots cast, and none of them shifted the election outcome.​

​

Voter fraud is serious, which is why there are many protections built into the system to protect against fraud. In an effort to “pre-bunk” the inevitable accusations of fraud, election officials around the country are working hard to inform the voters on how voting actually works.​

​

And—in one of the least well-known aspects of the vote count—Democrats and Republicans have teams of lawyers, armed with depositions, that are allowed into the rooms where counting is going on. To assume massive amounts of voter fraud, you also have to assume that the Democrats or the Republicans have lawyers who are really dumb or just lazy, and neither is the case.​

​

How widespread is election fraud in the United States? Not very | Brookings

In swing states, reported cases of voter fraud amounts to less than 1%.

www.brookings.edu

​

80% of ther country wants voter ID and democrats oppose it. Pure stupidity

 

[schmidlap]

80% of ther country wants voter ID and democrats oppose it. Pure stupidity

IDs to be flashed at poll nannies are no more more than a bureaucratic impediment to make an American's ability to vote more onerous. They are alleged to address a problem that has not been shown to exist, but if the bureaucratic barrier is as popular as early voting and vote-by-mail, why not?

 

[Hafar1014]

IDs to be flashed at poll nannies are no more more than a bureaucratic impediment to make an American's ability to vote more onerous. They are alleged to address a problem that has not been shown to exist, but if the bureaucratic barrier is as popular as early voting and vote-by-mail, why not?

The only reason to oppose it is because democrats want to cheat. Mail in ballots are another way to fake ballots

 

[Lockback]

Losers, paranoids and dumb folk attack American democracy, but the record shows elections have been extremely secure.

​

Looking at the seven closest states, we find for instance that in Arizona, Heritage had to go back 25 years, over which there were 36 elections held and 42,626,379 ballots cast, in order to come up with 36 cases of fraud. The percentage of fraudulent votes was a minuscule .0000845%, and no election outcome was altered by ballot fraud throughout that time period. In the highly contested state of Pennsylvania, Heritage data goes back 30 years and covers 32 elections with over 100 million votes cast and found only 39 cases of voter fraud. As the table indicates, this is the case with all the other states where the vote is likely to be close. There were a handful of reported cases of fraud amongst millions and millions of ballots cast, and none of them shifted the election outcome.​

​

Voter fraud is serious, which is why there are many protections built into the system to protect against fraud. In an effort to “pre-bunk” the inevitable accusations of fraud, election officials around the country are working hard to inform the voters on how voting actually works.​

​

And—in one of the least well-known aspects of the vote count—Democrats and Republicans have teams of lawyers, armed with depositions, that are allowed into the rooms where counting is going on. To assume massive amounts of voter fraud, you also have to assume that the Democrats or the Republicans have lawyers who are really dumb or just lazy, and neither is the case.​

​

How widespread is election fraud in the United States? Not very | Brookings

In swing states, reported cases of voter fraud amounts to less than 1%.

www.brookings.edu

​

I think you're drunk again.

 

[schmidlap]

The only reason to oppose it is because democrats want to cheat. Mail in ballots are another way to fake ballots

Your parroting the lies you have been issued with no credible evidence to sustain them is noted.

 

[schmidlap]

I think you're drunk again.

Your impotence in refuting the data I cited is noted.

There are far to many bipartisan safeguards to prevent an organized conspiracy of thousands of coordinated bogus voters perverting a democratic election - which is why you cannot cite any.

 

[schmidlap]

The real threat to our democratic elections:

Top bipartisan election officials from around the country are growing increasingly alarmed by what they see as Trump’s unprecedented push to interfere in the midterm elections.​

​

A series of recent moves — from his administration’s requests for access to state voter rolls to a surprise FBI raid at a Fulton County election office — have solidified those concerns, with more than a dozen election officials from both parties telling POLITICO they fear Trump is laying the groundwork to undermine results still months away.​

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/06/trump-state-election-officials-midterms-federal-power-00768050

​

 

[Hafar1014]

Your parroting the lies you have been issued with no credible evidence to sustain them is noted.

Its the onky common sense answer. Dencrrats intend to fake voters

 

[Lockback]

Your impotence in refuting the data I cited is noted.

There are far to many bipartisan safeguards to prevent an organized conspiracy of thousands of coordinated bogus voters perverting a democratic election - which is why you cannot cite any.

Just keep believing your socialist pipe dream.
It's bullshit. Just like everything else you believe in.
The 2020 election was a shitshow, a disaster, a fraud. Any rational person understands that.

 

[schmidlap]

Its the onky common sense answer. Dencrrats intend to fake voters

You swallow the hyper-partisan lies that are not supported by the credible evidence that any rational person would demand.

In Trump's purported vast conspiracy that stole his delusional "landslide!" in the 2020 presidential election, please list all the conspirators whom any states or his Department of Justice have charged.

 

[schmidlap]

Trumpwanks who swallow his blatant lie that his 2020 "landslide!" was stolen must believe that the necessarily vast, ingenious, coordinated conspiracy was executed flawlessly by every one of the thousands in cahoots, or that Trump's lickspittles are all incredibly incompetent in failing to find even a single person to charge.

 

[Hafar1014]

You swallow the hyper-partisan lies that are not supported by the credible evidence that any rational person would demand.

In Trump's purported vast conspiracy that stole his delusional "landslide!" in the 2020 presidential election, please list all the conspirators whom any states or his Department of Justice have charged.

The pupsoe of voter ID is only legal voters can vote
To be against it means you want illegal voters to vote
80% of the nation supports it
What evidence

 

[JohnDB]

American people favor voter ID 80+% over no ID.

Because they are tired of being robbed.

You get into a fender bender and are screwed over because the illegal alien doesn't even have a driver's license much less insurance on his borrowed car....IF HE WAS SOBER and not drunk or stoned.

Now these illegals want your vote too.


Besides....the last Senator said she would vote for it. Got 51 votes now....its gonna pass either before or after the recess.

 

[airplanemechanic]

American people favor voter ID 80+% over no ID.

Because they are tired of being robbed.

You get into a fender bender and are screwed over because the illegal alien doesn't even have a driver's license much less insurance on his borrowed car....IF HE WAS SOBER and not drunk or stoned.

Now these illegals want your vote too.


Besides....the last Senator said she would vote for it. Got 51 votes now....its gonna pass either before or after the recess.

You only HOPE it's a fender bender you get into with an illegal without a real drivers license:

 

[berg80]

American people favor voter ID 80+% over no ID.

Because they are tired of being robbed.

To the extent they think they have been robbed by voter fraud the public has swallowed a pack of lies.

 

[MisterBeale]

IDs to be flashed at poll nannies are no more more than a bureaucratic impediment to make an American's ability to vote more onerous.

 

[schmidlap]

Yes, most folks think that flashing an ID at a poll nanny would, in some inexplicable manner, address a problem that has not been shown to exist.