Democrats collapsed Detroit, now turn their focus on collapsing California

[JQPublic1]

The GOP ended Slavery and originated Civil Rights

So what happened in the interim? When did those Republican liberals become conservatives.

More Blacks voted GOP in the 2016 Presidential Election vs. the previous 2 elections

And most of them wll live to regret it.
Uncle Jeff Sessions will see to that.

 

[LeftofLeft]

The GOP ended Slavery and originated Civil Rights

So what happened in the interim? When did those Republican liberals become conservatives.

More Blacks voted GOP in the 2016 Presidential Election vs. the previous 2 elections

And most of them wll live to regret it.
Uncle Jeff Sessions will see to that.

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights. You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights..... they had an epiphany and realized that people are not individuals rather they are simply blocks of votes that simply need to be boxed in. That was the War on Poverty. Who's winning? Poverty is and the Black Family has been destroyed. No Liberal or Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that? In advance, dispense with the "go back to pre-Civil Rights" or "Republicans fight proper funding" bullshit. Those are copout arguments devoid of any valid economic or social data. Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

 

[rightwinger]

The GOP ended Slavery and originated Civil Rights

So what happened in the interim? When did those Republican liberals become conservatives.

More Blacks voted GOP in the 2016 Presidential Election vs. the previous 2 elections

And most of them wll live to regret it.
Uncle Jeff Sessions will see to that.

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights. You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights..... they had an epiphany and realized that people are not individuals rather they are simply blocks of votes that simply need to be boxed in. That was the War on Poverty. Who's winning? Poverty is and the Black Family has been destroyed. No Liberal or Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that? In advance, dispense with the "go back to pre-Civil Rights" or "Republicans fight proper funding" bullshit. Those are copout arguments devoid of any valid economic or social data. Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

Yes it was a liberal vs conservative thing

Abolitionists were Liberal
Conservatives ignored human rights and fought for state rights

 

[rightwinger]

The GOP ended Slavery and originated Civil Rights

So what happened in the interim? When did those Republican liberals become conservatives.

More Blacks voted GOP in the 2016 Presidential Election vs. the previous 2 elections

And most of them wll live to regret it.
Uncle Jeff Sessions will see to that.

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights. You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights..... they had an epiphany and realized that people are not individuals rather they are simply blocks of votes that simply need to be boxed in. That was the War on Poverty. Who's winning? Poverty is and the Black Family has been destroyed. No Liberal or Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that? In advance, dispense with the "go back to pre-Civil Rights" or "Republicans fight proper funding" bullshit. Those are copout arguments devoid of any valid economic or social data. Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

The war on poverty did not cause the dissolution of black families

The steady loss of manufacturing jobs in urban areas made it impossible for black males to support families like they used to

 

[JQPublic1]

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights.

And your small world, I guess Anything is Possible. But the fact of the matter is old southern. Democrats were conservative. They was responsible for slavery and , yes, they were Democrats. .These are the same kind of. conservative Democrats who later called Republicans bleeding-heart liberals because of the GOP's early efforts against slavery and promotion of civil rights. However, when MLK bought the violence and brutality of Southern conservatism to the world stage via television. JFK and the Democrats suddenly became the party of civil rights. Democrat conservatives jumped ship and fled to the GOP..takung their conservatism with them. Blacks...seeing the overtures made in their direction by the Democrats...signed up to serve their owm best interests.

You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights

Are there any Democrats left who fought against slavery abolition? If so, point them out to me and I'll be glad to ask them. Now to pull some of the politicians who fought against civil rights or still around but I don't think most of them remained Democrats.
And don't bring up that BS about a few dixiecrats who stayed in the party.. The scope of party switching im talking about entails millions of average southerners and their racist extremist elements.

Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that?

Is that all you see? If so you aren't looking deep enough.. The majority of Blacks are not impoverished. And that alleged high out of wedlock birthrate
doesn't mean most of those kids are not being taken care of. there's a plethora of sources that report Black women might be the most educated group in. America. Secondly, black male
are more likely to cohabitate with the mother of his children and support them than his white and hispanic counterparts. Families function without
marriage papers in the Black community.

Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

After you read the points i just made above you might not have a need to ask.

 

[LeftofLeft]

The GOP ended Slavery and originated Civil Rights

So what happened in the interim? When did those Republican liberals become conservatives.

More Blacks voted GOP in the 2016 Presidential Election vs. the previous 2 elections

And most of them wll live to regret it.
Uncle Jeff Sessions will see to that.

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights. You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights..... they had an epiphany and realized that people are not individuals rather they are simply blocks of votes that simply need to be boxed in. That was the War on Poverty. Who's winning? Poverty is and the Black Family has been destroyed. No Liberal or Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that? In advance, dispense with the "go back to pre-Civil Rights" or "Republicans fight proper funding" bullshit. Those are copout arguments devoid of any valid economic or social data. Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

The war on poverty did not cause the dissolution of black families

The steady loss of manufacturing jobs in urban areas made it impossible for black males to support families like they used to

Nice try on the manufacturing job loss in urban areas. Outside of Detroit, what other areas are you referring?

 

[HenryBHough]

California has become a vast toxic waste dump. Fortunate because it keeps the toxic waste - liberals- from polluting several other states.

 

[LeftofLeft]

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights.

And your small world, I guess Anything is Possible. But the fact of the matter is old southern. Democrats were conservative. They was responsible for slavery and , yes, they were Democrats. .These are the same kind of. conservative Democrats who later called Republicans bleeding-heart liberals because of the GOP's early efforts against slavery and promotion of civil rights. However, when MLK bought the violence and brutality of Southern conservatism to the world stage via television. JFK and the Democrats suddenly became the party of civil rights. Democrat conservatives jumped ship and fled to the GOP..takung their conservatism with them. Blacks...seeing the overtures made in their direction by the Democrats...signed up to serve their owm best interests.

You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights

Are there any Democrats left who fought against slavery abolition? If so, point them out to me and I'll be glad to ask them. Now to pull some of the politicians who fought against civil rights or still around but I don't think most of them remained Democrats.
And don't bring up that BS about a few dixiecrats who stayed in the party.. The scope of party switching im talking about entails millions of average southerners and their racist extremist elements.

Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that?

Is that all you see? If so you aren't looking deep enough.. The majority of Blacks are not impoverished. And that alleged high out of wedlock birthrate
doesn't mean most of those kids are not being taken care of. there's a plethora of sources that report Black women might be the most educated group in. America. Secondly, black male
are more likely to cohabitate with the mother of his children and support them than his white and hispanic counterparts. Families function without
marriage papers in the Black community.

Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

After you read the points i just made above you might not have a need to ask.

Subjective.

 

[HenryBHough]

To allow the homeless to show their strengths California will demand a new Olympic sport!

"Stolen supermarket shopping cart racing".

Each cart to be loaded with soiled clothing and empty bottles from cheap (but California only) wines.

Anyone vomiting on the course will be disqualified but first to defecate on the course will be given a 10-yard advantage so might not have to be first past the post to win.

 

[Tax Man]

Detroit was a manufacturing hub until the mid 60's. That was when off shoreing started. As the manufacturing left only people remained. Once unemployment ended they had no income and there was nowhere to get employed.
California has so much work it is unbelievable. People travel 100 plus miles to and from work in the state. That is a far cry from Detroit.

 

[Tax Man]

To allow the homeless to show their strengths California will demand a new Olympic sport!

"Stolen supermarket shopping cart racing".

Each cart to be loaded with soiled clothing and empty bottles from cheap (but California only) wines.

Anyone vomiting on the course will be disqualified but first to defecate on the course will be given a 10-yard advantage so might not have to be first past the post to win.

Sounds more east coast then west coast.

 

[rightwinger]

The GOP ended Slavery and originated Civil Rights

So what happened in the interim? When did those Republican liberals become conservatives.

More Blacks voted GOP in the 2016 Presidential Election vs. the previous 2 elections

And most of them wll live to regret it.
Uncle Jeff Sessions will see to that.

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights. You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights..... they had an epiphany and realized that people are not individuals rather they are simply blocks of votes that simply need to be boxed in. That was the War on Poverty. Who's winning? Poverty is and the Black Family has been destroyed. No Liberal or Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that? In advance, dispense with the "go back to pre-Civil Rights" or "Republicans fight proper funding" bullshit. Those are copout arguments devoid of any valid economic or social data. Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

The war on poverty did not cause the dissolution of black families

The steady loss of manufacturing jobs in urban areas made it impossible for black males to support families like they used to

Nice try on the manufacturing job loss in urban areas. Outside of Detroit, what other areas are you referring?

Camden, Newark, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Baltimore.......

 

[HenryBHough]

Sounds more east coast then west coast.

Yeah, but no Olympics coming up on the East coast.

 

[JQPublic1]

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights.

And your small world, I guess Anything is Possible. But the fact of the matter is old southern. Democrats were conservative. They was responsible for slavery and , yes, they were Democrats. .These are the same kind of. conservative Democrats who later called Republicans bleeding-heart liberals because of the GOP's early efforts against slavery and promotion of civil rights. However, when MLK bought the violence and brutality of Southern conservatism to the world stage via television. JFK and the Democrats suddenly became the party of civil rights. Democrat conservatives jumped ship and fled to the GOP..takung their conservatism with them. Blacks...seeing the overtures made in their direction by the Democrats...signed up to serve their owm best interests.

You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights

Are there any Democrats left who fought against slavery abolition? If so, point them out to me and I'll be glad to ask them. Now to pull some of the politicians who fought against civil rights or still around but I don't think most of them remained Democrats.
And don't bring up that BS about a few dixiecrats who stayed in the party.. The scope of party switching im talking about entails millions of average southerners and their racist extremist elements.

Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that?

Is that all you see? If so you aren't looking deep enough.. The majority of Blacks are not impoverished. And that alleged high out of wedlock birthrate
doesn't mean most of those kids are not being taken care of. there's a plethora of sources that report Black women might be the most educated group in. America. Secondly, black male
are more likely to cohabitate with the mother of his children and support them than his white and hispanic counterparts. Families function without
marriage papers in the Black community.

Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

After you read the points i just made above you might not have a need to ask.

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights.

And your small world, I guess Anything is Possible. But the fact of the matter is old southern. Democrats were conservative. They was responsible for slavery and , yes, they were Democrats. .These are the same kind of. conservative Democrats who later called Republicans bleeding-heart liberals because of the GOP's early efforts against slavery and promotion of civil rights. However, when MLK bought the violence and brutality of Southern conservatism to the world stage via television. JFK and the Democrats suddenly became the party of civil rights. Democrat conservatives jumped ship and fled to the GOP..takung their conservatism with them. Blacks...seeing the overtures made in their direction by the Democrats...signed up to serve their owm best interests.

You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights

Are there any Democrats left who fought against slavery abolition? If so, point them out to me and I'll be glad to ask them. Now to pull some of the politicians who fought against civil rights or still around but I don't think most of them remained Democrats.
And don't bring up that BS about a few dixiecrats who stayed in the party.. The scope of party switching im talking about entails millions of average southerners and their racist extremist elements.

Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that?

Is that all you see? If so you aren't looking deep enough.. The majority of Blacks are not impoverished. And that alleged high out of wedlock birthrate
doesn't mean most of those kids are not being taken care of. there's a plethora of sources that report Black women might be the most educated group in. America. Secondly, black male
are more likely to cohabitate with the mother of his children and support them than his white and hispanic counterparts. Families function without
marriage papers in the Black community.

Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

After you read the points i just made above you might not have a need to ask.

Subjective.

Nope...what i said is all verifiable.

 

[LeftofLeft]

The GOP ended Slavery and originated Civil Rights

So what happened in the interim? When did those Republican liberals become conservatives.

More Blacks voted GOP in the 2016 Presidential Election vs. the previous 2 elections

And most of them wll live to regret it.
Uncle Jeff Sessions will see to that.

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights. You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights..... they had an epiphany and realized that people are not individuals rather they are simply blocks of votes that simply need to be boxed in. That was the War on Poverty. Who's winning? Poverty is and the Black Family has been destroyed. No Liberal or Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that? In advance, dispense with the "go back to pre-Civil Rights" or "Republicans fight proper funding" bullshit. Those are copout arguments devoid of any valid economic or social data. Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

The war on poverty did not cause the dissolution of black families

The steady loss of manufacturing jobs in urban areas made it impossible for black males to support families like they used to

Nice try on the manufacturing job loss in urban areas. Outside of Detroit, what other areas are you referring?

Camden, Newark, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Baltimore.......

Limited.

 

[LeftofLeft]

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights.

And your small world, I guess Anything is Possible. But the fact of the matter is old southern. Democrats were conservative. They was responsible for slavery and , yes, they were Democrats. .These are the same kind of. conservative Democrats who later called Republicans bleeding-heart liberals because of the GOP's early efforts against slavery and promotion of civil rights. However, when MLK bought the violence and brutality of Southern conservatism to the world stage via television. JFK and the Democrats suddenly became the party of civil rights. Democrat conservatives jumped ship and fled to the GOP..takung their conservatism with them. Blacks...seeing the overtures made in their direction by the Democrats...signed up to serve their owm best interests.

You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights

Are there any Democrats left who fought against slavery abolition? If so, point them out to me and I'll be glad to ask them. Now to pull some of the politicians who fought against civil rights or still around but I don't think most of them remained Democrats.
And don't bring up that BS about a few dixiecrats who stayed in the party.. The scope of party switching im talking about entails millions of average southerners and their racist extremist elements.

Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that?

Is that all you see? If so you aren't looking deep enough.. The majority of Blacks are not impoverished. And that alleged high out of wedlock birthrate
doesn't mean most of those kids are not being taken care of. there's a plethora of sources that report Black women might be the most educated group in. America. Secondly, black male
are more likely to cohabitate with the mother of his children and support them than his white and hispanic counterparts. Families function without
marriage papers in the Black community.

Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

After you read the points i just made above you might not have a need to ask.

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights.

And your small world, I guess Anything is Possible. But the fact of the matter is old southern. Democrats were conservative. They was responsible for slavery and , yes, they were Democrats. .These are the same kind of. conservative Democrats who later called Republicans bleeding-heart liberals because of the GOP's early efforts against slavery and promotion of civil rights. However, when MLK bought the violence and brutality of Southern conservatism to the world stage via television. JFK and the Democrats suddenly became the party of civil rights. Democrat conservatives jumped ship and fled to the GOP..takung their conservatism with them. Blacks...seeing the overtures made in their direction by the Democrats...signed up to serve their owm best interests.

You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights

Are there any Democrats left who fought against slavery abolition? If so, point them out to me and I'll be glad to ask them. Now to pull some of the politicians who fought against civil rights or still around but I don't think most of them remained Democrats.
And don't bring up that BS about a few dixiecrats who stayed in the party.. The scope of party switching im talking about entails millions of average southerners and their racist extremist elements.

Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that?

Is that all you see? If so you aren't looking deep enough.. The majority of Blacks are not impoverished. And that alleged high out of wedlock birthrate
doesn't mean most of those kids are not being taken care of. there's a plethora of sources that report Black women might be the most educated group in. America. Secondly, black male
are more likely to cohabitate with the mother of his children and support them than his white and hispanic counterparts. Families function without
marriage papers in the Black community.

Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

After you read the points i just made above you might not have a need to ask.

Subjective.

Nope...what i said is all verifiable.

Then verify it.

 

[GreenBean]

You can always count on idiotic left-wing communist policy to end in poverty, misery, and collapse...

The roughly 1.4 million Californians who buy health insurance through the state Covered California exchange will see their premiums increase by an average of 12.5% next year.

Covered California, created under the Affordable Care Act and in its fourth year of operation, announced the proposed 2018 prices on Tuesday. Bay Area counties will see smaller increases than the 12.5% statewide rise. Rate increases will average 6.6% in San Francisco, 4.3% in San Mateo County, 8.2% in Contra Costa County, 10.4% in Santa Clara County and 8.3% in Alameda County. Marin, Solano, Sonoma and Napa counties are all part of the same pricing region, which will see an average increase of 7.4% overall.

Counties in the northern and central state would see far greater average increases of 33.2% and 24%, respectively. Experts said Bay Area rate increases are smaller in part because Kaiser, which dominates the region, generally had lower rate increases than other insurers.

State health premiums to rise an average 12.5 percent in 2018

How weird that you leave out this...

Overall costs for medical services are rising 6 to 7 percent a year, Lee said. The 12.5 percent average premium hike is higher than that partly because it builds in two other factors. One is a 2.8 percent increase passed on to consumers because insurers must start paying an ACA tax in 2018 that they had previously been able to defer. The other is a 3 percent increase that was incorporated because of uncertainty over ACA implementation at the federal level. The Trump administration has signaled that it will not fully enforce elements of the ACA — like the mandate that everyone buy coverage. The mandate spreads the cost of health care among a bigger pool of people, and state officials say not enforcing it could increase costs for those who get coverage.

The problems with the ACA are fixable. Republicans have to be willing to do it. They haven't shown the willingness to actually fix it and help people, only to destroy it and hurt people.

ACA was not designed to provide affordable health care to Americans , it was designed to further expedite the disintegration and gutting of American prosperity. ACA Chief architect Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel is on record admitting that the true purpose is to destroy private insurance companies. He wrote “Insurance Companies as We Know Them Are About to Die,”

Insurance Companies as We Know Them Are About to Die.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Collapsing California?...hmm,,,,we need to inform Hank Johnson

 

[JQPublic1]

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights.

And your small world, I guess Anything is Possible. But the fact of the matter is old southern. Democrats were conservative. They was responsible for slavery and , yes, they were Democrats. .These are the same kind of. conservative Democrats who later called Republicans bleeding-heart liberals because of the GOP's early efforts against slavery and promotion of civil rights. However, when MLK bought the violence and brutality of Southern conservatism to the world stage via television. JFK and the Democrats suddenly became the party of civil rights. Democrat conservatives jumped ship and fled to the GOP..takung their conservatism with them. Blacks...seeing the overtures made in their direction by the Democrats...signed up to serve their owm best interests.

You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights

Are there any Democrats left who fought against slavery abolition? If so, point them out to me and I'll be glad to ask them. Now to pull some of the politicians who fought against civil rights or still around but I don't think most of them remained Democrats.
And don't bring up that BS about a few dixiecrats who stayed in the party.. The scope of party switching im talking about entails millions of average southerners and their racist extremist elements.

Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that?

Is that all you see? If so you aren't looking deep enough.. The majority of Blacks are not impoverished. And that alleged high out of wedlock birthrate
doesn't mean most of those kids are not being taken care of. there's a plethora of sources that report Black women might be the most educated group in. America. Secondly, black male
are more likely to cohabitate with the mother of his children and support them than his white and hispanic counterparts. Families function without
marriage papers in the Black community.

Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

After you read the points i just made above you might not have a need to ask.

It was not a liberal or conservative thing to extend human rights by ending slavery and pushing for equal Civil Rights.

And your small world, I guess Anything is Possible. But the fact of the matter is old southern. Democrats were conservative. They was responsible for slavery and , yes, they were Democrats. .These are the same kind of. conservative Democrats who later called Republicans bleeding-heart liberals because of the GOP's early efforts against slavery and promotion of civil rights. However, when MLK bought the violence and brutality of Southern conservatism to the world stage via television. JFK and the Democrats suddenly became the party of civil rights. Democrat conservatives jumped ship and fled to the GOP..takung their conservatism with them. Blacks...seeing the overtures made in their direction by the Democrats...signed up to serve their owm best interests.

You ask what "happened" in the interim? Ask the Democrats who fought slavery abolition and civil rights

Are there any Democrats left who fought against slavery abolition? If so, point them out to me and I'll be glad to ask them. Now to pull some of the politicians who fought against civil rights or still around but I don't think most of them remained Democrats.
And don't bring up that BS about a few dixiecrats who stayed in the party.. The scope of party switching im talking about entails millions of average southerners and their racist extremist elements.

Democrat can explain the correlation of the passing of the War on Poverty legislation that was supposed to help Blacks but we see higher unemployment and more single mother households vs. pre-War On Poverty legislation. Why is that?

Is that all you see? If so you aren't looking deep enough.. The majority of Blacks are not impoverished. And that alleged high out of wedlock birthrate
doesn't mean most of those kids are not being taken care of. there's a plethora of sources that report Black women might be the most educated group in. America. Secondly, black male
are more likely to cohabitate with the mother of his children and support them than his white and hispanic counterparts. Families function without
marriage papers in the Black community.

Civil Rights and War on Poverty were supposed to make things better. Are they or why / how did things worsen?

After you read the points i just made above you might not have a need to ask.

Subjective.

Nope...what i said is all verifiable.

Then verify it.

I already have...that is...to my own satisfaction. If you are really interested you can do the same.BTW... don't ask me to do something you don't do.

 

[P@triot]

There were a lot more factors involved in the. housing market collaspe than the CRA. The Bush baby exacerbated the problem by adding. a "no money down" stipulation .

I won't argue that. So what we see yet again is that government interference in the free market caused the problem. Whether it is left-wing interference or right-wing interference, government getting involved where it has no constitutional authority to get involved, causes the problems.