Who do you mean by "us?" You don't even know what ceteris paribus means and you studied Latin for five years
Who do you mean by "us?" You don't even know what ceteris paribus means and you studied Latin for five years
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,143
- 2,255
- Banned
- #502
You're gonna have to take that up with O............it's his trope....
$700
No, he doesn't
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,143
- 2,255
- Banned
- #505
I was quoting from O's post.....and why do you persist in this idiocy?
I have explained to you how your idea of Ceteris Paribus is.......uh......."idiosyncratic".....
Though you remain welcome to tell me which of the numbers in your "illustration" are being held constant, and which is the dependent variable......
oh....btw
Tip's price for Reagan's plan was domestic spending. Reagan agreed to get his agenda. You can agree or disagree with that, but he didn't want the spending and it wasn't an economic plan.
and now we interrupt this blatherskite with a bit of Reality.....
Domestic Spending
. Overall domestic spending growth was relatively constrained during the Reagan presidency,
particularly compared with that of other presidencies, as shown in Table 3. In fact, domestic spending grew at a
slower real rate under Reagan than under all other recent presidents. Moreover, domestic outlays as a share of
GDP fell from 15.3 to 12.9 percent from 1981 to 1989 (Table 2). But the reductions in domestic spending were
substantially smaller than required to balance the federal budget, cut taxes, and finance a military build-up.
http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa261.pdf
. Overall domestic spending growth was relatively constrained during the Reagan presidency,
particularly compared with that of other presidencies, as shown in Table 3. In fact, domestic spending grew at a
slower real rate under Reagan than under all other recent presidents. Moreover, domestic outlays as a share of
GDP fell from 15.3 to 12.9 percent from 1981 to 1989 (Table 2). But the reductions in domestic spending were
substantially smaller than required to balance the federal budget, cut taxes, and finance a military build-up.
http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa261.pdf
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,143
- 2,255
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,143
- 2,255
Independent variables float, dumb ass, they aren't "held constant." By definition!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I was a math major before I was an MBA. OMG, you're stupid I can't make up ....
Answered a stupid question with a stupid answer. I mean ... duh ...
Asking a question I already answered. That's the playground troll I've come to expect
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,143
- 2,255
- Banned
- #511
I was a math major before I was an MBA. OMG, you're stupid I can't make up ....
That's a riot......I was an astronaut before I was a high school senior....
If your independent variables are floating, what is being held paribus?
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,143
- 2,255
I was a math major before I was an MBA. OMG, you're stupid I can't make up ....
That's a riot......I was an astronaut before I was a high school senior....
If your independent variables are floating, what is being held paribus?
?Independent variables are floating, not dependent variables. ??? Weren't a math major, were you. I was ...
Not sure what this has to do with the 2007 recession other than you're a hack Democrat who engages in contradiction, not debate. But whatever
Yes it was, or no it wasn't, or no it is, or ... what's the question again?
All you do is contradict, debate is higher than your pay grade.
The 2007 is on Republicans ... because ... you're a Democrat ... That's as deep as it goes. And no it was but it isn't
owebo
Gold Member
No shit, you are ******* serious......
He is, though he can't figure out what he's serious about. All he knows it is wasn't the Democrats, unless it was. Though 2007 is a blur to him. He was in a lounge calling himself Larry, that's all he remembers. Except for meeting a Yeti and winning the British Open. What were you asking him again?
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,143
- 2,255
- Banned
- #517
I was a math major before I was an MBA. OMG, you're stupid I can't make up ....
That's a riot......I was an astronaut before I was a high school senior....
If your independent variables are floating, what is being held paribus?
Independent variables are floating, not dependent variables. ??? Weren't a math major, were you. I was ...
Not sure what this has to do with the 2007 recession other than you're a hack Democrat who engages in contradiction, not debate. But whatever
Are you senile? The context was "printing money" and it's relationship to "currency devaluation" - not the 2007 Recession.
You have argued that your illustration employed "ceteris paribus".........ceteris paribus, in economics, holds some variables constant in order to establish the effect on dependent variables.......
I've asked you to distinguish the variables being held constant, or, if you prefer, the one being examined....This is not contradiction......
and I'm nominally a Republican.........
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,143
- 2,255
- Banned
- #518
I was a math major before I was an MBA. OMG, you're stupid I can't make up ....
That's a riot......I was an astronaut before I was a high school senior....
If your independent variables are floating, what is being held paribus?
Independent variables are floating, not dependent variables. ??? Weren't a math major, were you. I was ...
Not sure what this has to do with the 2007 recession other than you're a hack Democrat who engages in contradiction, not debate. But whatever
Are you senile? The context was "printing money" and it's relationship to "currency devaluation" - not the 2007 Recession.
You have argued that your illustration employed "ceteris paribus".........ceteris paribus, in economics, holds some variables constant in order to establish the effect on dependent variables.......
I've asked you to distinguish the variables being held constant, or, if you prefer, the one being examined....This is not contradiction......
and I'm nominally a Republican.........
No I didn't. And no you aren't
owebo
Gold Member
he is a piece of work....for billing out at 2000 dollars an hour, he sure is a idiot....
He keeps ranting on about wanting to know the price of a Big Mac in his ghetto McDonald's for some reason...don't ask me why, I have no ******* clue....
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
US to release 172 million barrels from Strategic Petroleum Reserve to try to bring down gas prices- Started by Dont Taz Me Bro
- Replies: 5
-
Islamofascist Mullah regime's vast damage AND huge potential still = does prove 2.28.26 operation was vital- Started by Sayaras
- Replies: 9
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss- Latest: P F Tinmore
-
-
Lebanese Maronite Catholic priest killed by Israeli tank fire in southern Lebanon- Latest: Andrew_Jackson_FTW
