Democrats can censor all media online once again.

[Votto]

MSN

www.msn.com

The Supreme Court has stayed a court injunction which effectively restricted the Biden Administration from censoring conservative voices online, opening the door yet again for conservatives to be targeted and silenced on social media.

Justice Samuel Alito believes the decision is “highly disturbing,” and a threat to the first amendment.

“This case concerns what two lower courts found to be a coordinated campaign by high-level federal officials to suppress the expression of disfavored views on important public issues,” Alito stated, emphasizing that the injunction had kept officials from the Biden Administration from “either coercing social media companies to engage in such censorship or actively controlling those companies’ decisions about the content posted on their platforms.”

“Today … a majority of the Court, … without any explanation, suspends the effect of that injunction until the Court completes its review of this case, an event that may not occur until late in the spring of next year,” Alito added.

“Government censorship of private speech is antithetical to our democratic form of government, and therefore today’s decision is highly disturbing.”

Yay for facism and the coming election in November!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Next thing you know member of Congress will be booing reporters and yelling at them to shut up.

 

[DBA]

Next thing you know member of Congress will be booing reporters and yelling at them to shut up.

You can’t possibly believe that the press is non-biased as they are supposed to be. Are Republicans supposed to sit back and just except dishonest reporting and censoring of information based on politics? You don’t see any danger in this?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You can’t possibly believe that the press is non-biased as they are supposed to be

They are not non-biased in any way.

Are Republicans supposed to sit back and just except dishonest reporting and censoring of information based on politics?

Was the question asked dishonest? Was the question a lie?

 

[candycorn]

The press is supposed to be fair. If you’re human, you have a bias.

 

[candycorn]

MSN

www.msn.com

The Supreme Court has stayed a court injunction which effectively restricted the Biden Administration from censoring conservative voices online, opening the door yet again for conservatives to be targeted and silenced on social media.

Justice Samuel Alito believes the decision is “highly disturbing,” and a threat to the first amendment.

“This case concerns what two lower courts found to be a coordinated campaign by high-level federal officials to suppress the expression of disfavored views on important public issues,” Alito stated, emphasizing that the injunction had kept officials from the Biden Administration from “either coercing social media companies to engage in such censorship or actively controlling those companies’ decisions about the content posted on their platforms.”

“Today … a majority of the Court, … without any explanation, suspends the effect of that injunction until the Court completes its review of this case, an event that may not occur until late in the spring of next year,” Alito added.

“Government censorship of private speech is antithetical to our democratic form of government, and therefore today’s decision is highly disturbing.”

Yay for facism and the coming election in November!

Yeah when can we expect Breitbart to be shut down? Uh...never.

There is an election this November?

 

[Independentthinker]

MSN

www.msn.com

The Supreme Court has stayed a court injunction which effectively restricted the Biden Administration from censoring conservative voices online, opening the door yet again for conservatives to be targeted and silenced on social media.

Justice Samuel Alito believes the decision is “highly disturbing,” and a threat to the first amendment.

“This case concerns what two lower courts found to be a coordinated campaign by high-level federal officials to suppress the expression of disfavored views on important public issues,” Alito stated, emphasizing that the injunction had kept officials from the Biden Administration from “either coercing social media companies to engage in such censorship or actively controlling those companies’ decisions about the content posted on their platforms.”

“Today … a majority of the Court, … without any explanation, suspends the effect of that injunction until the Court completes its review of this case, an event that may not occur until late in the spring of next year,” Alito added.

“Government censorship of private speech is antithetical to our democratic form of government, and therefore today’s decision is highly disturbing.”

Yay for facism and the coming election in November!

I guess Biden may have the same kind of media that Russia has now, government controlled.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

They are not non-biased in any way

I thought you were just a leftist hack...

Considering you don't believe our media to be biased goes well beyond just being a hack. It's dangerously close to clinical retardation

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I thought you were just a leftist hack...

Considering you don't believe our media to be biased goes well beyond just being a hack. It's dangerously close to clinical retardation

You might want to go back and get your GED and take a grammar class so you do not look like such a moron.

If someone is not non-biased, that would mean they are biased.

Are you really this ignorant?

 

[Lesh]

A reminder, this is a 6-3 Conservative Court with three judges picked by Trump

 

[GMCGeneral]

The press is supposed to be fair. If you’re human, you have a bias.

The press is SUPPOSED to be 10000% politically NEUTRAL dumb slut. As it is the Lamestream Press is openly hostile towards Conservatives, always have been.

 

[candycorn]

The press is SUPPOSED to be 10000% politically NEUTRAL dumb slut.

You're ignorant.

Nobody on the planet is 10000% politically neutral. They are supposed to be fair.

As it is the Lamestream Press is openly hostile towards Conservatives, always have been.

Your child-like silly accusations only make you look more pathetic. The reason conservatives get bad press is because they take abhorrent positions

 

[GMCGeneral]

You're ignorant.

Nobody on the planet is 10000% politically neutral. They are supposed to be fair.

Your child-like silly accusations only make you look more pathetic. The reason conservatives get bad press is because they take abhorrent positions

No, the fucking Pravda masquerading as "fair" press has always been hostile towards Conservatives. You're just a fucking far Left Soviet Commie who sides with them. When's the last time the Lamestream Press ever reported on a Republican who isn't a dickless "moderate" favorably? How about never. And during the era of the "Fairness" Doctrine, the far Left had an unfettered monopoly on the media. No Conservative was ever allowed to speak.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Next thing you know member of Congress will be booing reporters and yelling at them to shut up.

Meh. A little Fascism never hurt anyone. It's perfectly normal for a government to use their police powers against reporters and political opponents

 

[candycorn]

No, the fucking Pravda masquerading as "fair" press has always been hostile towards Conservatives. You're just a fucking far Left Soviet Commie who sides with them. When's the last time the Lamestream Press ever reported on a Republican who isn't a dickless "moderate" favorably? How about never. And during the era of the "Fairness" Doctrine, the far Left had an unfettered monopoly on the media. No Conservative was ever allowed to speak.

Who hasn't been allowed to speak?

 

[The Duke]

The press is supposed to be fair. If you’re human, you have a bias.

90%+ of the press is biased towards Democrats.

 

[The Duke]

You might want to go back and get your GED and take a grammar class so you do not look like such a moron.

If someone is not non-biased, that would mean they are biased.

Are you really this ignorant?

Gramps never claimed to have a degree.

He's not really ignorant, he just started working instead of going to school.

I almost replied the same until I read it again. It was the ambiguousness of your post that led to that.

Ya Dick. It was an easy mistake to make due to your wording.