Asking wouldn't violate 1st amendment protections, demanding would.What's the difference?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Asking wouldn't violate 1st amendment protections, demanding would.What's the difference?
A distinction without a difference.Asking wouldn't violate 1st amendment protections, demanding would.
You missed the boat. Twitter wasn't 'wildly conservative' ask Trump....LOLWhy didn't Taibbi investigate the many, many times that the wildly conservative Twitter shilled for Republicans? Why did he just fake one story about liberal bias?
No he wasn't, he demanded Carlson be removed from the air now. A blatant violation by the government of freedom of the press......and you support it.You act like Schumer was threatening legal action, instead of just stating what any honest fascist-hating person would state. Wildly dishonest of you.
And why are all of you lying and claiming that Twitter, Trump's bestest buddy and favorite lie-spreader for many years, hasn't been wildly conservative in its bias?
Demands usually come with an incentive.....implied or inferred.A distinction without a difference.
Perhaps forced or compelled are better?
Demand doesn't necessarily mean a punishment or consequence.
But they don't have to so the word is ambiguous for legal use.Demands usually come with an incentive.....implied or inferred.
Basically mean the same thing as demand or asked.Perhaps forced or compelled are better?
That's what I am saying.Basically mean the same thing as demand or asked.
You can't make someone do something by demanding, asking, compelling or forcing them if they do not want to.
That's what I am saying.
Then why did you come back with this?Perhaps forced or compelled are better?
Ah, I misread your post. My bad.Then why did you come back with this?
if a cow shit butter, there would be no need to churn it, stay on topic junior
That's the same thing they did when the wiki guy (Julian Assange?), was laying out the bombshell's on them... They attacked the messenger's but stayed as far away from the content within the messages that were explosive as they could. Talk about a slam dunk on their bull shite WOW .Not one of them dealt with reality of the twitter files content, only attacks on the journalists......LOL
If there was any doubt that the Twitter Files have struck a nerve and deep fear in the Powers That Be, Thursday’s disgraceful behavior by Democrats in a hearing featuring journalists Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger eviscerated it.
Taibbi and Shellenberger had not even uttered a word yet when the Ranking Member of the House Judiciary subcommittee Del. Stacey Plaskett, D-U.S. Virgin Islands, referred to the witnesses as "so-called journalists" in her opening statement. The pair glanced at each other, clearly surprised and confused by the utterly unprovoked attack.
From there it only got worse. Rep. Sylvia Garcia, D-Texas, asked the pair of scribes if they were being paid to testify, again to an absolutely shocked response from them. She went on to try to force Taibbi to reveal information about his sources, a journalistic Rubicon he rightfully refused to cross.
The chilling message, and one meant for all journalists, was crystal clear: if you report uncomfortable facts that Democrats don’t like, they will attack you and try to discredit you and your work.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/twit...ge-journalists
The true nature of Democrats is being revealed for all to see, they are masters of deception that have no real interest in the citizens that elect them.
Sol you telling us you have a farm?Whenever you post something, the first impression I get is that it is cow shit.
my first impression of you is an abused childWhenever you post something, the first impression I get is that it is cow shit.
my first impression of you was someone who abuses drugs.my first impression of you is an abused child
you mean second? lmao, damn you can't even count to twomy first impression of you was someone who abuses drugs.
More crack use?you mean second? lmao, damn you can't even count to two
Goodbye idiotMore crack use?
Dude callin' you a crack head when his handle starts with 'candy'.Goodbye idiot
And ends with corn... LOLDude callin' you a crack head when his handle starts with 'candy'.