Democrats and Ghetto's, They own them

[francoHFW]

Thats how ghettos were formed unless you think Redlining is fiction.

So people who had no money moved in without money. Now why were those people attracted to that particular area? Coincidence?

Since redlining is an actual thing that can be proven shouldnt we at least acknowledge its effects? Or should we continue to act confused by how all the poor people ended up in one area?

Ok, now you're just bullshitting. I'm black and have been around groups of blacks and not one time did a gang fight break out or a riot.

I trust thats how you feel but when you say blacks cant gather without a gang fight you become see through

Redlining has been illegal for years, so quit making excuses:

In the United States, the Fair Housing Act of 1968 was passed to fight the practice. According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development "The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale of a dwelling because of race or national origin. The Act also makes it unlawful for any person or other entity whose business includes residential real estate-related transactions to discriminate against any person in making available such a transaction, or in the terms or conditions of such a transaction, because of race or national origin."[19] The Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity was tasked with administering and enforcing this law. Anyone who suspects that their neighborhood has been redlined is able to file a housing discrimination complaint. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 further required banks to apply the same lending criteria in all communities.[20]

Redlining - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you, DEMS. OTOH, discrimination is alive and well. And Bush crony/thief regulators and private lenders wrecked the world with A+ rated private toxic loans 2002-8....

So tell us Wall Street genius, what were the banks supposed to do with all those bad securities created by HUD and F&F? And speaking of race, what do you suppose happened to all those blacks when they got foreclosed on since they couldn't afford the payments?

They WERE NOT created by F+F or HUD. F+F's share of the market went from 75% to 25% in 2002-3, and didn't get on board (pressured by GOP) until later.

The GOP didn't pressure anybody. You're so FOS.

F&F make the regulations banks have to go by in order to make loans. If a bank doesn't comply with those regulations, they can't sell those loans off. They have to keep them.

What about Countrywide etc- Pals of Booshies...not pressure anyone...funny stuff!!

 

[francoHFW]

Breitbart LOL.

...and mainly Pub mindless obstruction of reform duh...

Hey Duh, read the piece instead of just criticizing it. Maybe you'll learn how to use hyperlinks if you don't like the original.

I read it. Booosh screwed it all up, privatizing loans with his banker pals, and Pubs have blocked Dem reform like a 10% of income cap, lower rates, and cap on years paid. Also cut fed aid to public U's so their cost doubled just under him- we need cheap public U's to kep private costs down. . Duped again!

Man, I thought he could go 2 pages without doing it, but I was wrong! Here we are DUPED again!

Franco, Franco, remedial English please!

He claims to be a retired educator. I would guess, fired, but with the NEA in charge of our education, he might be one of the best.

You may very well be correct. Notice, how far LEFT he is, and tell me it did not bleed into the classroom!

So far left I'm in the center with Obama, except in bs Pubworld lol...

 

[francoHFW]

I know why college loans and public colleges got more expensive...the GOP DUH.

It was predicted quite some time ago:

Student Loan Debt Exploding After More Government Involvement
by TONY LEE29 Nov 2012

During the 2012 campaign, President Barack Obama’s Education Secretary Arne Duncan said the administration’s goal was to make “student loans available to as many people as possible” regardless of credit score, something Obama called an “economic imperative in the 21st century.”


But according to a new Federal Reserve report, “U.S. student-loan debt rose by $42 billion, or 4.6%, to $956 billion in the third quarter,” and federal programs that made it easy for people to borrow loans are pushing more people into debt to the point where some analysts believe bailout funds may next to go writing off defaulted student loans.

According to the Wall Street Journal:

Student Loan Debt Exploding After More Government Involvement - Breitbart

Breitbart LOL.

...and mainly Pub mindless obstruction of reform duh...

Hey Duh, read the piece instead of just criticizing it. Maybe you'll learn how to use hyperlinks if you don't like the original.

I read it. Booosh screwed it all up, privatizing loans with his banker pals, and Pubs have blocked Dem reform like a 10% of income cap, lower rates, and cap on years paid. Also cut fed aid to public U's so their cost doubled just under him- we need cheap public U's to kep private costs down. . Duped again!

So would you work for those cheap "U's" for a lot less money?

College is a business. Like any business, the more demand and less supply, the higher the price tag. If the government puts more people into college--especially those that can't repay the loans, then you have a lot more demand than supply.

They pay fine- just restore fed aid and voila. Do you know about Boooshies changing laws so their pals could start online scam colleges to fleece returning GIs? I didn't think so. Damn commies at 60 Minutes....

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It was predicted quite some time ago:

Student Loan Debt Exploding After More Government Involvement
by TONY LEE29 Nov 2012

During the 2012 campaign, President Barack Obama’s Education Secretary Arne Duncan said the administration’s goal was to make “student loans available to as many people as possible” regardless of credit score, something Obama called an “economic imperative in the 21st century.”


But according to a new Federal Reserve report, “U.S. student-loan debt rose by $42 billion, or 4.6%, to $956 billion in the third quarter,” and federal programs that made it easy for people to borrow loans are pushing more people into debt to the point where some analysts believe bailout funds may next to go writing off defaulted student loans.

According to the Wall Street Journal:

Student Loan Debt Exploding After More Government Involvement - Breitbart

Breitbart LOL.

...and mainly Pub mindless obstruction of reform duh...

Hey Duh, read the piece instead of just criticizing it. Maybe you'll learn how to use hyperlinks if you don't like the original.

I read it. Booosh screwed it all up, privatizing loans with his banker pals, and Pubs have blocked Dem reform like a 10% of income cap, lower rates, and cap on years paid. Also cut fed aid to public U's so their cost doubled just under him- we need cheap public U's to kep private costs down. . Duped again!

So would you work for those cheap "U's" for a lot less money?

College is a business. Like any business, the more demand and less supply, the higher the price tag. If the government puts more people into college--especially those that can't repay the loans, then you have a lot more demand than supply.

They pay fine- just restore fed aid and voila. Do you know about Boooshies changing laws so their pals could start online scam colleges to fleece returning GIs? I didn't think so. Damn commies at 60 Minutes....

No, I never heard of it, but I'm sure you have a link.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Redlining has been illegal for years, so quit making excuses:

In the United States, the Fair Housing Act of 1968 was passed to fight the practice. According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development "The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale of a dwelling because of race or national origin. The Act also makes it unlawful for any person or other entity whose business includes residential real estate-related transactions to discriminate against any person in making available such a transaction, or in the terms or conditions of such a transaction, because of race or national origin."[19] The Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity was tasked with administering and enforcing this law. Anyone who suspects that their neighborhood has been redlined is able to file a housing discrimination complaint. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 further required banks to apply the same lending criteria in all communities.[20]

Redlining - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you, DEMS. OTOH, discrimination is alive and well. And Bush crony/thief regulators and private lenders wrecked the world with A+ rated private toxic loans 2002-8....

So tell us Wall Street genius, what were the banks supposed to do with all those bad securities created by HUD and F&F? And speaking of race, what do you suppose happened to all those blacks when they got foreclosed on since they couldn't afford the payments?

They WERE NOT created by F+F or HUD. F+F's share of the market went from 75% to 25% in 2002-3, and didn't get on board (pressured by GOP) until later.

The GOP didn't pressure anybody. You're so FOS.

F&F make the regulations banks have to go by in order to make loans. If a bank doesn't comply with those regulations, they can't sell those loans off. They have to keep them.

What about Countrywide etc- Pals of Booshies...not pressure anyone...funny stuff!!

Pals of Bush? Lol, prove it. You libs with your Bush buddies. Everybody is a buddy of Bush apparently.

 

[sealybobo]

View attachment 57506

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

If all the money is truly in the hands of the 1%, why do I see all these new brick homes being sold, all these new cars, trucks, and boats being sold, and all these citizens running around with high-priced cell phones. What you are claiming just doesn't make much sense.

Well actually the economy is getting a little better and educated Americans are starting to get raises. Thanks Obama.

But uneducated Americans are still struggling. The top 1% mostly fucked them to get richer.

 

[sealybobo]

View attachment 57506

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

No, that's not the problem. The problem is liberal thinking.

Liberals think we live in a bubble. Within our bubble, there is only so much money. Therefore if one has too much money, that means others have less.

There is no truth to that flawed liberal logic. If that were the case, when I approach my employer for a wage increase, and he tells me he would love to give me a raise, but he can't because the rich have too much money, then it would be a different issue.

But that's never happened in this country. That's because money is endless for everybody willing to go out and get money. If you want to be poor, then don't work and have no money. If you want to be middle-class, get a good paying job, learn a trade or career, or otherwise open up your own business. If you want to be wealthy, get an advanced education, make a lot of sacrifices like cell phones, satellite television, video games and so on, and take huge investment risks. It's all up to you.

But no matter what you do, you can't blame it on who has more money than you. If we had two wealthy people in this country or 22 million, it doesn't change my life one bit and nobody else's either.

We have a wealth distribution problem. CEO making too much and employees not making enough. Rich getting richer on cheap housing and stock market, the masses making 1% on their savings. Corporations pay lower taxes, Republican gov Rick Snyder raises our taxes.

The GOP made things easier for the rich and harder for us. You clearly don't get that.

What we have is a lack of ambition problem. Most of us who own our own businesses and are successful had our roots in poverty or below poverty. We simply were not satisfied with our lot in life and worked hard to change it ourselves instead of sitting on our butts lusting after someone else's money or waiting on the government to assist us.

Most of you got a loan from daddy

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

View attachment 57506

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

If all the money is truly in the hands of the 1%, why do I see all these new brick homes being sold, all these new cars, trucks, and boats being sold, and all these citizens running around with high-priced cell phones. What you are claiming just doesn't make much sense.

Well actually the economy is getting a little better and educated Americans are starting to get raises. Thanks Obama.

But uneducated Americans are still struggling. The top 1% mostly fucked them to get richer.

No thanks to DumBama. Our economy is the result of more money in the pockets of Americans thanks to Fracking which lowered all of our fuel bills. Fracking is just yet another enemy of the left which they've been trying to slow down. More money means more spending and that's what we have to be thankful for.

How is the 1% screwing the uneducated Americans still struggling?

 

[the_human_being]

View attachment 57506

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

If all the money is truly in the hands of the 1%, why do I see all these new brick homes being sold, all these new cars, trucks, and boats being sold, and all these citizens running around with high-priced cell phones. What you are claiming just doesn't make much sense.

Well actually the economy is getting a little better and educated Americans are starting to get raises. Thanks Obama.

But uneducated Americans are still struggling. The top 1% mostly fucked them to get richer.

Then the uneducated should get off their collective butts and get an education. We have public schools everywhere.

 

[the_human_being]

View attachment 57506

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

No, that's not the problem. The problem is liberal thinking.

Liberals think we live in a bubble. Within our bubble, there is only so much money. Therefore if one has too much money, that means others have less.

There is no truth to that flawed liberal logic. If that were the case, when I approach my employer for a wage increase, and he tells me he would love to give me a raise, but he can't because the rich have too much money, then it would be a different issue.

But that's never happened in this country. That's because money is endless for everybody willing to go out and get money. If you want to be poor, then don't work and have no money. If you want to be middle-class, get a good paying job, learn a trade or career, or otherwise open up your own business. If you want to be wealthy, get an advanced education, make a lot of sacrifices like cell phones, satellite television, video games and so on, and take huge investment risks. It's all up to you.

But no matter what you do, you can't blame it on who has more money than you. If we had two wealthy people in this country or 22 million, it doesn't change my life one bit and nobody else's either.

We have a wealth distribution problem. CEO making too much and employees not making enough. Rich getting richer on cheap housing and stock market, the masses making 1% on their savings. Corporations pay lower taxes, Republican gov Rick Snyder raises our taxes.

The GOP made things easier for the rich and harder for us. You clearly don't get that.

What we have is a lack of ambition problem. Most of us who own our own businesses and are successful had our roots in poverty or below poverty. We simply were not satisfied with our lot in life and worked hard to change it ourselves instead of sitting on our butts lusting after someone else's money or waiting on the government to assist us.

Most of you got a loan from daddy

This one didn't. My parents were uneducated and below the poverty level. Their lot in life is what made me determined I was not going to live my life the way they did.

 

[sealybobo]

View attachment 57506

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

If all the money is truly in the hands of the 1%, why do I see all these new brick homes being sold, all these new cars, trucks, and boats being sold, and all these citizens running around with high-priced cell phones. What you are claiming just doesn't make much sense.

Well actually the economy is getting a little better and educated Americans are starting to get raises. Thanks Obama.

But uneducated Americans are still struggling. The top 1% mostly fucked them to get richer.

Then the uneducated should get off their collective butts and get an education. We have public schools everywhere.

You have to have at least a trade certification or associates degree to be considered educated. People who only have a high school degree make less than people with associates. People who have bachelor "in general" make more than associates. People with masters make more than bachelors.

If you're a plumber who's certified you are educated imo

 

[sealybobo]

View attachment 57506

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

If all the money is truly in the hands of the 1%, why do I see all these new brick homes being sold, all these new cars, trucks, and boats being sold, and all these citizens running around with high-priced cell phones. What you are claiming just doesn't make much sense.

Well actually the economy is getting a little better and educated Americans are starting to get raises. Thanks Obama.

But uneducated Americans are still struggling. The top 1% mostly fucked them to get richer.

No thanks to DumBama. Our economy is the result of more money in the pockets of Americans thanks to Fracking which lowered all of our fuel bills. Fracking is just yet another enemy of the left which they've been trying to slow down. More money means more spending and that's what we have to be thankful for.

How is the 1% screwing the uneducated Americans still struggling?

1 manufacturing job is worth 3 fracking jobs.

 

[sealybobo]

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

No, that's not the problem. The problem is liberal thinking.

Liberals think we live in a bubble. Within our bubble, there is only so much money. Therefore if one has too much money, that means others have less.

There is no truth to that flawed liberal logic. If that were the case, when I approach my employer for a wage increase, and he tells me he would love to give me a raise, but he can't because the rich have too much money, then it would be a different issue.

But that's never happened in this country. That's because money is endless for everybody willing to go out and get money. If you want to be poor, then don't work and have no money. If you want to be middle-class, get a good paying job, learn a trade or career, or otherwise open up your own business. If you want to be wealthy, get an advanced education, make a lot of sacrifices like cell phones, satellite television, video games and so on, and take huge investment risks. It's all up to you.

But no matter what you do, you can't blame it on who has more money than you. If we had two wealthy people in this country or 22 million, it doesn't change my life one bit and nobody else's either.

We have a wealth distribution problem. CEO making too much and employees not making enough. Rich getting richer on cheap housing and stock market, the masses making 1% on their savings. Corporations pay lower taxes, Republican gov Rick Snyder raises our taxes.

The GOP made things easier for the rich and harder for us. You clearly don't get that.

What we have is a lack of ambition problem. Most of us who own our own businesses and are successful had our roots in poverty or below poverty. We simply were not satisfied with our lot in life and worked hard to change it ourselves instead of sitting on our butts lusting after someone else's money or waiting on the government to assist us.

Most of you got a loan from daddy

This one didn't. My parents were uneducated and below the poverty level. Their lot in life is what made me determined I was not going to live my life the way they did.

What percent of the population do you think can do what you did? 5%? Or could a monkey do what you did?

I'm not worrying about you or me. I'm talking about the masses?

I notice either you blame Obama for their wooes but now you're suggesting its only the uneducated masses for the fact the rich got the government to screw the masses and the rich got richer.

Oh I forgot, you don't think government should regulate this kind of thing.

The problem with Republicans is that they're wrong on so many levels it's hard to explain

 

[the_human_being]

View attachment 57506

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

If all the money is truly in the hands of the 1%, why do I see all these new brick homes being sold, all these new cars, trucks, and boats being sold, and all these citizens running around with high-priced cell phones. What you are claiming just doesn't make much sense.

Well actually the economy is getting a little better and educated Americans are starting to get raises. Thanks Obama.

But uneducated Americans are still struggling. The top 1% mostly fucked them to get richer.

Then the uneducated should get off their collective butts and get an education. We have public schools everywhere.

You have to have at least a trade certification or associates degree to be considered educated. People who only have a high school degree make less than people with associates. People who have bachelor "in general" make more than associates. People with masters make more than bachelors.

If you're a plumber who's certified you are educated imo

Of course. Most of the really wealthy folks I know are trades people who own their own businesses. Many college folks with degrees simply work for a company or corporation for a paycheck. Many folks with college degrees work for these trades folks who own their own businesses. College is overrated. I have a college degree but it leans more or less towards the technical and trades arena and afforded a vehicle whereby I could start my own company.

 

[the_human_being]

No, that's not the problem. The problem is liberal thinking.

Liberals think we live in a bubble. Within our bubble, there is only so much money. Therefore if one has too much money, that means others have less.

There is no truth to that flawed liberal logic. If that were the case, when I approach my employer for a wage increase, and he tells me he would love to give me a raise, but he can't because the rich have too much money, then it would be a different issue.

But that's never happened in this country. That's because money is endless for everybody willing to go out and get money. If you want to be poor, then don't work and have no money. If you want to be middle-class, get a good paying job, learn a trade or career, or otherwise open up your own business. If you want to be wealthy, get an advanced education, make a lot of sacrifices like cell phones, satellite television, video games and so on, and take huge investment risks. It's all up to you.

But no matter what you do, you can't blame it on who has more money than you. If we had two wealthy people in this country or 22 million, it doesn't change my life one bit and nobody else's either.

We have a wealth distribution problem. CEO making too much and employees not making enough. Rich getting richer on cheap housing and stock market, the masses making 1% on their savings. Corporations pay lower taxes, Republican gov Rick Snyder raises our taxes.

The GOP made things easier for the rich and harder for us. You clearly don't get that.

What we have is a lack of ambition problem. Most of us who own our own businesses and are successful had our roots in poverty or below poverty. We simply were not satisfied with our lot in life and worked hard to change it ourselves instead of sitting on our butts lusting after someone else's money or waiting on the government to assist us.

Most of you got a loan from daddy

This one didn't. My parents were uneducated and below the poverty level. Their lot in life is what made me determined I was not going to live my life the way they did.

What percent of the population do you think can do what you did? 5%? Or could a monkey do what you did?

I'm not worrying about you or me. I'm talking about the masses?

I notice either you blame Obama for their wooes but now you're suggesting its only the uneducated masses for the fact the rich got the government to screw the masses and the rich got richer.

Oh I forgot, you don't think government should regulate this kind of thing.

The problem with Republicans is that they're wrong on so many levels it's hard to explain

I don't think the rich screwed anyone. I think a person screws him/herself. We all make choices. I'm an electrical engineer. Anyone who has a math background should be able to do what I do with the appropriate education. There are a whole lot of us working in the field so it must not be all that difficult. As with anything, some are better at it than others. No, I really don't blame Obama. I blame the individual.

 

[Wyatt earp]

No, that's not the problem. The problem is liberal thinking.

Liberals think we live in a bubble. Within our bubble, there is only so much money. Therefore if one has too much money, that means others have less.

There is no truth to that flawed liberal logic. If that were the case, when I approach my employer for a wage increase, and he tells me he would love to give me a raise, but he can't because the rich have too much money, then it would be a different issue.

But that's never happened in this country. That's because money is endless for everybody willing to go out and get money. If you want to be poor, then don't work and have no money. If you want to be middle-class, get a good paying job, learn a trade or career, or otherwise open up your own business. If you want to be wealthy, get an advanced education, make a lot of sacrifices like cell phones, satellite television, video games and so on, and take huge investment risks. It's all up to you.

But no matter what you do, you can't blame it on who has more money than you. If we had two wealthy people in this country or 22 million, it doesn't change my life one bit and nobody else's either.

We have a wealth distribution problem. CEO making too much and employees not making enough. Rich getting richer on cheap housing and stock market, the masses making 1% on their savings. Corporations pay lower taxes, Republican gov Rick Snyder raises our taxes.

The GOP made things easier for the rich and harder for us. You clearly don't get that.

What we have is a lack of ambition problem. Most of us who own our own businesses and are successful had our roots in poverty or below poverty. We simply were not satisfied with our lot in life and worked hard to change it ourselves instead of sitting on our butts lusting after someone else's money or waiting on the government to assist us.

Most of you got a loan from daddy

This one didn't. My parents were uneducated and below the poverty level. Their lot in life is what made me determined I was not going to live my life the way they did.

What percent of the population do you think can do what you did? 5%? Or could a monkey do what you did?

I'm not worrying about you or me. I'm talking about the masses?

I notice either you blame Obama for their wooes but now you're suggesting its only the uneducated masses for the fact the rich got the government to screw the masses and the rich got richer.

Oh I forgot, you don't think government should regulate this kind of thing.

The problem with Republicans is that they're wrong on so many levels it's hard to explain

Oh really, did you also say that about republicans when Michigan went Right to Work?

More Jobs, Higher Pay Since Right-to-Work Passed in Michigan


Since its right-to-work law took effect, Michigan has experienced the nation's sixth-largest growth in the number of people working, adding 141,990 jobs from March 2013 through December 2014, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics


James Hohman, assistant director of fiscal policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, said not only has there been an increase in employment since right-to-work was passed in Michigan, but incomes in the state have grown

 

[WelfareQueen]

Eeekkkkk Wrong!

Red States Are Welfare Queens
Red States Are Welfare Queens

As it turns out, it is red states that are overwhelmingly the Welfare Queen States. Yes, that's right. Red States — the ones governed by folks who think government is too big and spending needs to be cut — are a net drain on the economy, taking in more federal spending than they pay out in federal taxes. They talk a good game, but stick Blue States with the bill.

This gets trotted out every two months by liberal morons. It's been debunked over and over again...yet still the same bullshit.

Liberals are dumb.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

View attachment 57506

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

If all the money is truly in the hands of the 1%, why do I see all these new brick homes being sold, all these new cars, trucks, and boats being sold, and all these citizens running around with high-priced cell phones. What you are claiming just doesn't make much sense.

Well actually the economy is getting a little better and educated Americans are starting to get raises. Thanks Obama.

But uneducated Americans are still struggling. The top 1% mostly fucked them to get richer.

No thanks to DumBama. Our economy is the result of more money in the pockets of Americans thanks to Fracking which lowered all of our fuel bills. Fracking is just yet another enemy of the left which they've been trying to slow down. More money means more spending and that's what we have to be thankful for.

How is the 1% screwing the uneducated Americans still struggling?

1 manufacturing job is worth 3 fracking jobs.

I don't understand what in hell that's even supposed to mean or how it's an answer to my question.

 

[the_human_being]

View attachment 57506

If you want to live in a country wit low taxes and low regulations and no social services go to Pakistan.

One thing all nations have in common is they all have poor people and rich people. When all the money is in 1%s hands, that's a problem.

If all the money is truly in the hands of the 1%, why do I see all these new brick homes being sold, all these new cars, trucks, and boats being sold, and all these citizens running around with high-priced cell phones. What you are claiming just doesn't make much sense.

Well actually the economy is getting a little better and educated Americans are starting to get raises. Thanks Obama.

But uneducated Americans are still struggling. The top 1% mostly fucked them to get richer.

No thanks to DumBama. Our economy is the result of more money in the pockets of Americans thanks to Fracking which lowered all of our fuel bills. Fracking is just yet another enemy of the left which they've been trying to slow down. More money means more spending and that's what we have to be thankful for.

How is the 1% screwing the uneducated Americans still struggling?

1 manufacturing job is worth 3 fracking jobs.

I've seen a lot of manufacturing jobs go to pot. Don't get me wrong, those folks employed in manufacturing jobs are happy campers. Many of them make a fair wage. I know guys who work and drive new pickup trucks and have nice boats. They work a 40 hour work week and spend their Saturdays and Sundays drinking beer, making babies, and fishing. Maybe they work in a carpet factory or run a machine in a paper mill. When the mill folds and closes down, these folks are out of a job with no real skill to fall back on.

 

[the_human_being]

I guess in the Liberal mindset, those who get up off their butts and work hard and achieve some sort of success and posterity for themselves and their family are somehow to blame for the underachievement of the rest of society.