Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Not perhaps and nothing odd. Reagan couldn't muster a coalition or support for the defense of or for the Christians or pro west and neutral Sunni's so he cut and ran. Lebanon came under the control of Iran via Hezbollah and Sryria. Armed and well equiped troops of the Revolutionary Gaurd and Hezbbollah exterminated or chased the Christians out and put any other factions opposed to dictorial rule in graves or into submission. It still goes on to this day. We are still dealing with the same terrorist organizations that should have been annihilated in the 80's.
As Lebanon was being lost, responsibilty for acts of terrorism against the USA shifted to a guy named Muammar Qaddafi who was the dictator of Libya and desired to be viewed as the leader of the Arab world. He ended up giving Reagan and the USA a special Christmas present in 1988 as a response to a weak and lame response by Reagan for Qaddafi's murder of Americian troops in Germany.
Alright, but that still avoids two issues.
First, why there were no more hostages taken, after all, the kidnap of Buckley happened long after the Marines left Lebanon.
Secondly; exactly what you would have suggested as a better alternative?
Also, the response to the German Disco bombing was swift and deadly. I do believe Kadaffi lost family members, and damned near his own life as a result of that attack.