Democrat policies increase American gun ownership to record level...52%. ..........will they run on this?

Jarlaxle's defense of 2aguy is, like, 'nuh uh'. What a fool.

A mass shooting is at least four casualties, one dead, not including the shooter.

There are now 610 of them.

No....that is a lie...Here...again, is the actual definition.

US mass shootings, 1982–2023: Data from Mother Jones’ investigation

Dating back to at least 2005, the FBI and leading criminologists essentially defined a mass shooting as a single attack in a public place in which four or more victims were killed. We adopted that baseline for fatalities when we gathered data in 2012 on three decades worth of cases.
-------

  • Here is a description of the criteria we use:

    • The perpetrator took the lives of at least four people. A 2008 FBI report identifies an individual as a mass murderer—versus a spree killer or a serial killer—if he kills four or more people in a single incident (not including himself), typically in a single location. (*In 2013, the US government’s fatality baseline was revised down to three; our database reflects this change beginning from Jan. 2013, as detailed above.)
    • The killings were carried out by a lone shooter. (Except in the case of the Columbine massacre and the Westside Middle School killings, which involved two shooters.)
    • The shootings occurred in a public place. (Except in the case of a party on private property in Crandon, Wisconsin, and another in Seattle, where crowds of strangers had gathered, essentially constituting a public crowd.) Crimes primarily related to gang activity or armed robbery are not included, nor are mass killings that took place in private homes (often stemming from domestic violence).
    • Perpetrators who died or were wounded during the attack are not included in the victim tallies.
    • We included a handful of cases also known as “spree killings“—cases in which the killings occurred in more than one location, but still over a short period of time, that otherwise fit the above criteria.
    ----------------------
Our research focused on indiscriminate rampages in public places resulting in four or more victims killed by the attacker. We exclude shootings stemming from more conventionally motivated crimes such as armed robbery or gang violence. (Or in which the perpetrators have not been identified.) Other news outlets and researchers have since published larger tallies that include a wide range of gun crimes in which four or more people have been either wounded or killed. While those larger datasets of multiple-victim shootings are useful for studying the broader problem of gun violence, our investigation provides an in-depth look at a distinct phenomenon—from the firearms used and mental health factors to the growing copycat problem. Tracking mass shootings is complex; we believe ours is the most useful approach for studying this specific phenomenon.
 
2aguy wants to do a reset and change the rules.

No.

More than 600 mass shootings occurred this year and nothing he says can change that. Ever.
you are the one trying to change the meaning and rules retard. The Government is very clear on what it considers a mass shooting and the definition has been given over and over in this thread your moronic attempt to claim otherwise is noted and ridiculed as the foolish ramblings of an idiot and retard.
 
Jarlaxle's defense of 2aguy is, like, 'nuh uh'. What a fool.

A mass shooting is at least four casualties, one dead, not including the shooter.

There are now 610 of them.
No, it is not it is a shooting in a public space where 4 or more people NOT including the shooter or shooters are KILLED. That is the Governments definition, and it is official.
 

Forum List

Back
Top