Democrat Dirty Tricks are Getting Repetitive

[eagle1462010]

It worked with Roy Moore.

Yup........and then after he lost........it all just MAGICALLY WENT AWAY.

Statute of limitations had expired years ago.
And these women did not gain from their coming forward.
Just the opposite.
They have more balls in their little finger than you do in your whole sack.
.
.
.

I'd say they are a bunch of Lying whores...........probably very well paid whores........for doing the political dance....

Politics are dirty.............and character Assassination is nothing new.

Even Roy Moore never made those claims.
He didn't deny knowing them.
He just lied about what he did to them.
The shopping center mall manager who had to tell him to stay off the property, where he was trolling girls, was the nail his coffin.
Gather the facts before you open your pie hole.
.
.
.

You wouldn't know a fact if it reached up an bit you in the butt

 

[rightwinger]

Here's how it works: Just before an important election or vote, bring out someone who is willing to smear the other side with a sexual allegation that has no legal merit. Then drop the entire matter after the vote. This way, the person being accused has neither time nor legal standing to refute the allegation.

So much for more civility in our government. One can only hope that voters will start waking up to this disgusting tactic and throw its perpetrators out of office.

Can’t help it if Republicans have creepy sexual histories

 

[basquebromance]

this is why Hannity's show is so repetitive. he exposes the Democrats every night

 

[Cassandro]

I guess you can certainly hope for that outcome. God knows that all the other stuff the right is saying and doing isn't helping you much.

LOL I would ask you to explain your post, but that would probably cause your tiny head to explode.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[Cassandro]

Can’t help it if Republicans have creepy sexual histories

Can't help it if the subject matter is too complicated for you?

 

[deanrd]

Watching the Republican's nasty and disgusting behavior come to fruition proves everything I've been saying about the Republican Party for the last 10 years.

Clearly, I've been vindicated.

 

[deanrd]

Everybody on the Judicial committee on both sides were men.

Today is a different day.

 

[eagle1462010]

Went home and didn't report it for 10 hours............The Lion of the Senate.

 

[BluesLegend]

No it was all just a big coincidence that Feinstein sat on the letter for 2 months and only shared it at the last minute. /extreme sarcasm

Mitch McConnell sat on Merrick Garland and the GOP refused a sitting president's nomination for SCOTUS.
I bet you thought that was just fine, huh ******* hypocrite?
.
.
.

Yes we stole the nomination from Obama, so what.

 

[eagle1462010]

Everybody on the Judicial committee on both sides were men.

Today is a different day.

Character assassination..............and another Lying whore.

 

[eagle1462010]

The War Against Robert H. Bork - Commentary Magazine

To defeat Bork, the Left spent a huge amount of money—$10 to $15 million—on a negative political campaign of a size wholly unprecedented in the history of American judicial selection. They could not have mounted such a Herculean effort had they not hated Bork with a special venom. And indeed they did hate and fear him intensely, because of the special role he had come to play as a conservative in this country’s intellectual politics.

The big anti-Bork TV commercial that PFAW ran was an example of this approach. The spot was narrated by Gregory Peck, whose screen image is one of rectitude and whose voice we all trust. “There’s a special feeling of awe people get,” intones Peck in the commercial, “when they visit the Supreme Court of the United States, the ultimate guardian of our liberties.” As Peck speaks, a traditional four-person nuclear family, with faces of a sort we have rarely seen since Leave It to Beaver, is walking up the Court steps. Father points the building out to the children. Peck goes on. Bork should not be on the Court, he says: “He defended poll taxes and literacy tests, which kept many Americans from voting. He opposed the civil-rights law that ended ‘whites only’ signs at lunch counters. He doesn’t believe the Constitution protects your right to privacy. And he thinks freedom of speech does not apply to literature and art and music.” The commercial ends with the family in profile, gazing reverently at the Court. A gentle wind blows through their hair. The camera focuses lovingly on the cherubic face of the youngest. The End.

This entire spot was composed of false innuendoes and outright lies. For example, Bork never defended poll taxes or literacy tests. He said the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution was the wrong rationale for the Supreme Court to have used in striking down a $1.50 poll tax in Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections.He explicitly indicated that he was able to reach his conclusion only because the case did not involve racial discrimination. He also made it quite clear that he thought the tax might well be unconstitutional on other grounds. To turn all this into a defense of poll taxes was slander.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Here's how it works: Just before an important election or vote, bring out someone who is willing to smear the other side with a sexual allegation that has no legal merit. Then drop the entire matter after the vote. This way, the person being accused has neither time nor legal standing to refute the allegation.

So much for more civility in our government. One can only hope that voters will start waking up to this disgusting tactic and throw its perpetrators out of office.

Oh, you mean like when James Comey came out 10 days before the election in 2016 and said the FBI was re-investigating Hillary's emails and looking into Anthony Weiner's laptop that he shared with his wife, Hillary's assistant Huma Abedin?

Cry me a ******* river.
Works for you when it makes things go your way.
,
.
.
.

She should have been charged by that point. He listed all of her crimes. Then did nothing. So **** your crying and **** your river. You left wingers are shit bags.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Statute of limitations had expired years ago.
And these women did not gain from their coming forward.
Just the opposite.

Like Anita Hill (Wikipedia)?

Hill accepted a position as a visiting scholar at the Institute for the Study of Social Change at University of California, Berkeley in January 1997,[39] but soon joined the faculty of Brandeis University—first at the Women's Studies Program, later moving to the Heller School for Social Policy and Management. In 2011, she also took a counsel position with the Civil Rights & Employment Practice group of the plaintiffs' law firm Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll.[8]

Over the years, Hill has provided commentary on gender and race issues on national television programs, including 60 Minutes, Face the Nation and Meet the Press.[4][8] She has been a speaker on the topic of commercial law as well as race and women's rights.[8] She is also the author of articles that have been published in The New York Times and Newsweek[4][8] and has contributed to many scholarly and legal publications in the areas of international commercial law, bankruptcy, and civil rights.[8][40]

In 1995 Hill co-edited Race, Gender and Power in America: The Legacy of the Hill-Thomas Hearings with Emma Coleman Jordan.[4][41] In 1997 Hill published her autobiography, Speaking Truth to Power,[42][page needed] in which she chronicled her role in the Clarence Thomas confirmation controversy[4][6] and wrote that creating a better society had been a motivating force in her life.[43] She contributed the piece "The Nature of the Beast: Sexual Harassment" to the 2003 anthology Sisterhood Is Forever: The Women's Anthology for a New Millennium, edited by Robin Morgan.[44] In 2011 Hill published her second book, Reimagining Equality: Stories of Gender, Race, and Finding Home, which focuses on the sub-prime lending crisis that resulted in the foreclosure of many homes owned by African-Americans.[13][45] She calls for a new understanding about the importance of a home and its place in the American Dream.[6] On March 26, 2015, the Brandeis Board of Trustees unanimously voted to recognize Hill with a promotion to Private University Professor of Social Policy, Law, and Women's Studies.[46]

On December 16, 2017, the Commission on Sexual Harassment and Advancing Equality in the Workplace was formed, selecting Hill to lead its charge against sexual harassment in the entertainment industry. The new initiative was spearheaded by co-chair of the Nike Foundation Maria Eitel, venture capitalist Freada Kapor Klein, Lucasfilm President Kathleen Kennedy and talent attorney Nina Shaw.[47]

Are you really as stupid as what you post?

From your Wiki quote:

"Hill accepted a position as a visiting scholar at the Institute for the Study of Social Change at University of California, Berkeley in January 1997"""

That was 5 years after the hearing.
Wow, what a rush of job offers and opportunities.
U of C at Berkeley, home of Angela Davis, hardly a bastion of conservatism.

Are you really as stupid as what you copy and paste?
.
.
.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It worked with Roy Moore.

Yup........and then after he lost........it all just MAGICALLY WENT AWAY.

Statute of limitations had expired years ago.
And these women did not gain from their coming forward.
Just the opposite.
They have more balls in their little finger than you do in your whole sack.
.
.
.

I'd say they are a bunch of Lying whores...........probably very well paid whores........for doing the political dance....

Politics are dirty.............and character Assassination is nothing new.

Even Roy Moore never made those claims.
He didn't deny knowing them.
He just lied about what he did to them.
The shopping center mall manager who had to tell him to stay off the property, where he was trolling girls, was the nail his coffin.
Gather the facts before you open your pie hole.
.
.
.

Except for the fact that the mall had no records of the manager telling him that.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Here's how it works: Just before an important election or vote, bring out someone who is willing to smear the other side with a sexual allegation that has no legal merit. Then drop the entire matter after the vote. This way, the person being accused has neither time nor legal standing to refute the allegation.

So much for more civility in our government. One can only hope that voters will start waking up to this disgusting tactic and throw its perpetrators out of office.

Oh, you mean like when James Comey came out 10 days before the election in 2016 and said the FBI was re-investigating Hillary's emails and looking into Anthony Weiner's laptop that he shared with his wife, Hillary's assistant Huma Abedin?

Cry me a ******* river.
Works for you when it makes things go your way.
,
.
.
.

Comey was not a Republican operative. He had no choice. Had he not said anything about them, and they turned up having incriminating evidence after the election, he would have been screwed had she won.

Remember who it was that got Hillary off the hook.

Yes, he did have a choice.
You don't see Mueller making any kind of announcements or holding press conferences, do you?
And the mid-terms are only 50 days away.
He's got Paul Manafort on his side now.
Lots at stake.
He's doing it the right way.
.
.
.

Manafort was a short-term member of his administration and everything they have on him has nothing to do with the Trump investigation. Even Lisa Page recently admitted there was zero evidence by the FBI that Trump had anything to do with Russia that prompted the investigation.

 

[BluesLegend]

Watching the Republican's nasty and disgusting behavior come to fruition proves everything I've been saying about the Republican Party for the last 10 years.

Clearly, I've been vindicated.

How many Dem party high ranking BFF's in the media have gone down in flames over abusing women in just the past year, 20? Sorry your side has zero credibility

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Everybody on the Judicial committee on both sides were men.

Today is a different day.

Character assassination..............and another Lying whore.

Maybe you're either too young or too ******* stupid to remember the circumstances under which Anita Hill testified.
Let me remind you:
She was interviewed as a former employee of his for the confirmation process.
She told the truth about the working environment.
The FBI investigated her claims and she was forced to testify.
.
.
.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Here's how it works: Just before an important election or vote, bring out someone who is willing to smear the other side with a sexual allegation that has no legal merit. Then drop the entire matter after the vote. This way, the person being accused has neither time nor legal standing to refute the allegation.

So much for more civility in our government. One can only hope that voters will start waking up to this disgusting tactic and throw its perpetrators out of office.

Oh, you mean like when James Comey came out 10 days before the election in 2016 and said the FBI was re-investigating Hillary's emails and looking into Anthony Weiner's laptop that he shared with his wife, Hillary's assistant Huma Abedin?

Cry me a ******* river.
Works for you when it makes things go your way.
,
.
.
.

Comey was not a Republican operative. He had no choice. Had he not said anything about them, and they turned up having incriminating evidence after the election, he would have been screwed had she won.

Remember who it was that got Hillary off the hook.

Yes, he did have a choice.
You don't see Mueller making any kind of announcements or holding press conferences, do you?
And the mid-terms are only 50 days away.
He's got Paul Manafort on his side now.
Lots at stake.
He's doing it the right way.
.
.
.

Manafort was a short-term member of his administration and everything they have on him has nothing to do with the Trump investigation. Even Lisa Page recently admitted there was zero evidence by the FBI that Trump had anything to do with Russia that prompted the investigation.

Thanks for those links to prove your claims.
You're mouthing Trump talking points that Trump gets from Fox.

"The depth of their relationship pre-2016 isn’t well-known, but it’s clear Trump and Manafort have been operating in close circles for decades. In 1980, Manafort, Charles Black, and Roger Stone (all Ronald Reagan campaign officials) opened a lobbying shop in Washington, D.C. One of their very first clients: Donald Trump, who employed the lobbying firm of Black, Manafort & Stone through the early 1990s."""
Paul Manafort and Donald Trump Have Known Each Other for a Very, Very Long Time

And you're editing a bit too much about Lisa Page:
Lisa Page bombshell: FBI couldn’t prove Trump-Russia collusion before Mueller appointment
.
.
LOL!
.