DEM election fraud exposed

If the Florida Supreme Court rejects this, then I believe it will probably go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Yes, it will probably also be overturned there, but the light it will shine on this injustice might embolden millions more to vote Democrat in 2020!!!
HA ha. You hope it would do that. I doubt it. Most people would say the felons involved in the voting scenario, SHOULD pay the fines and restitution they owe, before getting any rights, voting or otherwise. If some screwball set fore to you house, and ruined it, shoudn't they have to pay for that ? Why should the victim go without any restitution payment. why should they suffer ?

Unlike Democrats, "millions more" voters are more concerned with the victim, than they are with a felony criminal.
sorta like the republicans are more concerned with the cops rather than their victims
 
So you're using numbers that somebody pulled out of their ass. No actual count. That's like the Puerto Rican death toll from hurricane Maria, not based on how many the hurricane killed, but how many more people died, even if their deaths had nothing to do with the hurricane.
It's not so much numbers as it it is reports. Many, many reports by universities, think tanks, media.. + common sense (see post # 38) :biggrin:
 
sorta like the republicans are more concerned with the cops rather than their victims
And also when the cops ARE the victims >>

 
It's not so much numbers as it it is reports. Many, many reports by universities, think tanks, media.. + common sense (see post # 38) :biggrin:
I checked out one of your reports.
From one of them, getting the numbers from judicial watch, it said:

Judicial Watch is not alleging that any voter fraud has occurred.

They were complaining that in Fairfax Va, that the names of dead people, and those who moved out of the state were not being removed from the voting rolls fast enough.
 
Statistical voter fraud, vs actual voter fraud.

During the last reporting period, the county removed only 5,800 voter registrations per year due to failure of registrants to respond to address-confirmation notices and failure to vote in two consecutive elections.

Maybe you didn't notice but voters have to respond to address confirmation notices mailed to them, in order to maintain voter eligibility.

And election material can't be forwarded to a different address.

I requested a ballot by mail but moved before it arrived. I submitted a forwarding address request to the postal service but I have not received my ballot. What happened to my ballot?
Your ballot was probably returned to the Recorder’s Office by the postal service marked "undeliverable.” Under Arizona law voting materials, including ballots, cannot be forwarded to a new address by the United States Postal Service.
 
WOLF WOLF WOLF
Politics
Analysis
A review of Trump’s many unsubstantiated allegations of voter fraud
After crying wolf for four years, no wolves.

Image without a caption
By
Philip Bump
May 26, 2020 at 11:44 a.m. EDT
As President Trump was loudly insisting that mail-in voting was rife with fraud in recent days, there was a quiet development in Florida that reinforced the reality of what Trump was up to.
You may recall that, in the days following the 2018 midterm elections, there was some uncertainty in the results in Florida's gubernatorial and Senate races. While Democrats nationally won clear victories in a number of closely contested House races, Florida looked different, with then-Gov. Rick Scott (R) appearing to win a close Senate race and then-Rep. Ron DeSantis (R) narrowly winning the race to replace Scott. As more votes came in, though, both Scott's and DeSantis's leads narrowed.
In short order, Scott alleged that voter fraud had taken place and that the votes coming in from heavily Democratic Broward County were tainted. There was no evidence for this, but it was politically useful for Scott to suggest that he was the victim of an effort to steal the election and not simply the guy whose win was uncertain.
AD


Trump joined Scott’s evidence-free allegations, eager both for a Republican win the contest and to disparage Democrats as committing fraud. At one point Trump suggested that the results at the end of election night should stand — effectively disenfranchising thousands of absentee voters — and, at another point, he claimed that law enforcement was “looking into another big corruption scandal having to do with Election Fraud.”
That investigation is complete. No evidence of fraud was uncovered. Scott won, but more narrowly than it seemed he would on election night.
It is critically important to recognize this outcome, particularly given Trump’s current efforts to disparage mail-in balloting as risky. Trump was at it again on Tuesday morning, claiming that “Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed” if states increase mail-in voting. It’s a variation of a refrain we’ve heard over and over from Trump over the past four years — a refrain that literally has never been substantiated, as it wasn’t in Florida.
 
Mail-in ballot security.

Under Arizona law, before a ballot by mail may be accepted for tabulation, the Recorder’s Office is required to compare the signature on the ballot by mail affidavit with the signature on the voter’s registration form. This comparison confirms that the voter is the person who actually voted the ballot.
 
I checked out one of your reports.
From one of them, getting the numbers from judicial watch, it said:

Judicial Watch is not alleging that any voter fraud has occurred.

They were complaining that in Fairfax Va, that the names of dead people, and those who moved out of the state were not being removed from the voting rolls fast enough.
The posts are a GROUP.One must read all of them Including their sublinks to adequately understand the content. Cherry picking one little sentence of one link is oit of context nonsense.
 
Mail-in ballot security.

Under Arizona law, before a ballot by mail may be accepted for tabulation, the Recorder’s Office is required to compare the signature on the ballot by mail affidavit with the signature on the voter’s registration form. This comparison confirms that the voter is the person who actually voted the ballot.
Which means nothing as relates to CITIZENSHIP eligibility or non-CITIZENSHIP.
 
WOLF WOLF WOLF
Politics
Analysis
A review of Trump’s many unsubstantiated allegations of voter fraud
After crying wolf for four years, no wolves.

Image without a caption
By
Philip Bump
May 26, 2020 at 11:44 a.m. EDT
As President Trump was loudly insisting that mail-in voting was rife with fraud in recent days, there was a quiet development in Florida that reinforced the reality of what Trump was up to.
You may recall that, in the days following the 2018 midterm elections, there was some uncertainty in the results in Florida's gubernatorial and Senate races. While Democrats nationally won clear victories in a number of closely contested House races, Florida looked different, with then-Gov. Rick Scott (R) appearing to win a close Senate race and then-Rep. Ron DeSantis (R) narrowly winning the race to replace Scott. As more votes came in, though, both Scott's and DeSantis's leads narrowed.
In short order, Scott alleged that voter fraud had taken place and that the votes coming in from heavily Democratic Broward County were tainted. There was no evidence for this, but it was politically useful for Scott to suggest that he was the victim of an effort to steal the election and not simply the guy whose win was uncertain.
AD

WOLF WOLF WOLF
Politics
Analysis
A review of Trump’s many unsubstantiated allegations of voter fraud
After crying wolf for four years, no wolves.

Image without a caption
By
Philip Bump
May 26, 2020 at 11:44 a.m. EDT
As President Trump was loudly insisting that mail-in voting was rife with fraud in recent days, there was a quiet development in Florida that reinforced the reality of what Trump was up to.
You may recall that, in the days following the 2018 midterm elections, there was some uncertainty in the results in Florida's gubernatorial and Senate races. While Democrats nationally won clear victories in a number of closely contested House races, Florida looked different, with then-Gov. Rick Scott (R) appearing to win a close Senate race and then-Rep. Ron DeSantis (R) narrowly winning the race to replace Scott. As more votes came in, though, both Scott's and DeSantis's leads narrowed.
In short order, Scott alleged that voter fraud had taken place and that the votes coming in from heavily Democratic Broward County were tainted. There was no evidence for this, but it was politically useful for Scott to suggest that he was the victim of an effort to steal the election and not simply the guy whose win was uncertain.
AD


Trump joined Scott’s evidence-free allegations, eager both for a Republican win the contest and to disparage Democrats as committing fraud. At one point Trump suggested that the results at the end of election night should stand — effectively disenfranchising thousands of absentee voters — and, at another point, he claimed that law enforcement was “looking into another big corruption scandal having to do with Election Fraud.”
That investigation is complete. No evidence of fraud was uncovered. Scott won, but more narrowly than it seemed he would on election night.
It is critically important to recognize this outcome, particularly given Trump’s current efforts to disparage mail-in balloting as risky. Trump was at it again on Tuesday morning, claiming that “Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed” if states increase mail-in voting. It’s a variation of a refrain we’ve heard over and over from Trump over the past four years — a refrain that literally has never been substantiated, as it wasn’t in Florida.

Trump joined Scott’s evidence-free allegations, eager both for a Republican win the contest and to disparage Democrats as committing fraud. At one point Trump suggested that the results at the end of election night should stand — effectively disenfranchising thousands of absentee voters — and, at another point, he claimed that law enforcement was “looking into another big corruption scandal having to do with Election Fraud.”
That investigation is complete. No evidence of fraud was uncovered. Scott won, but more narrowly than it seemed he would on election night.
It is critically important to recognize this outcome, particularly given Trump’s current efforts to disparage mail-in balloting as risky. Trump was at it again on Tuesday morning, claiming that “Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed” if states increase mail-in voting. It’s a variation of a refrain we’ve heard over and over from Trump over the past four years — a refrain that literally has never been substantiated, as it wasn’t in Florida.

Nope. No wolves, but thousands of human illegal aliens voting illegally (for Democrats)
 
I checked out one of your reports.
From one of them, getting the numbers from judicial watch, it said:

Judicial Watch is not alleging that any voter fraud has occurred.

They were complaining that in Fairfax Va, that the names of dead people, and those who moved out of the state were not being removed from the voting rolls fast enough.
The posts are a GROUP.One must read all of them Including their sublinks to adequately understand the content. Cherry picking one little sentence of one link is oit of context nonsense.

I picked one at random, and found it was bullshit. I'm not going to go through all of them before declaring them bullshit.

Lesson - when offering a long list of citations, make sure that each one, can stand the scrutiny of someone randomly picking it.
 
It's the same kind of BS trump threw about Obama not being a citizen They make up shit ,throw it against the wall to see what sticks Unfortunately Trump morons believe the drivel
 
I checked out one of your reports.
From one of them, getting the numbers from judicial watch, it said:

Judicial Watch is not alleging that any voter fraud has occurred.

They were complaining that in Fairfax Va, that the names of dead people, and those who moved out of the state were not being removed from the voting rolls fast enough.
The posts are a GROUP.One must read all of them Including their sublinks to adequately understand the content. Cherry picking one little sentence of one link is oit of context nonsense.

I picked one at random, and found it was bullshit. I'm not going to go through all of them before declaring them bullshit.

Lesson - when offering a long list of citations, make sure that each one, can stand the scrutiny of someone randomly picking it.
They can ALL stand the scrutiny, and any scrutiny.
 
It's the same kind of BS trump threw about Obama not being a citizen They make up shit ,throw it against the wall to see what sticks Unfortunately Trump morons believe the drivel
There never has been any true confirmation about where Obama was born. Some pieces of paper claim he was born in Hawaii. His older, blood relatives claim he was born in Africa, and that they were there at the time. Jumping to either conclusion, and wearing it like a badge, seems like the action of a biased partisan, putting party affiliation ahead of truth (still unknown for sure).
 
I picked one at random, and found it was bullshit. I'm not going to go through all of them before declaring them bullshit.

Lesson - when offering a long list of citations, make sure that each one, can stand the scrutiny of someone randomly picking it.
If you're not going to take the time and effort to go through a series of links, and get a full idea, you're not prepared to pass judgement, and shouldn't be doing that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top