Delusional Climate explainers...

[BluesLegend]

Even this week’s cold weather is probably being caused at least in part by global warming

WTF? These morons are insane.

 

[bripat9643]

So you don't believe the voters should have any say in the laws that govern us?

Voters have a say, they have their say via voting for an individual to represent them. As is pointed out often, we are not a democracy so you do not get to vote on each individual law.

But again, I am glad that there was not enough morons like you back in the 70 and 80s. Sadly your kind, who put party before all else, have multiplied like rabbits since those days.

Our representatives didn't even vote on these regulations, moron. The EPA simply imposed them without any input from Congress or the public whatsoever.

Is there any science you do not deny? I wonder if you still use leeches since you are so afraid of science. I am actually surprised that you even acknowledge the fact the internet exist.

Are you also a flat earther? Do you belive the moon landing was a hoax?

Only an obedient drone would blindly trust government sources for what he believes.

I do not blindly trust anything. Have you ever taken the datasets for climate change and ran them through a program like SPSS or R and perform multivariate analyses to see what the numbers have to say?

What actual research have you done on the topic of climate change? What scientific journals on the subject have you read? Have you ever done anything more than just parrot the GOP talking points on the subject?

Amazing someone like you would have the balls to accuse someone else of blind acceptance.

What are the "data sets for climate change?" You mean the temperature records that so-called "climate scientists" have doctored and homogenized beyond recognition? If you take a ball of manure and cover it with frosting, it still tastes like shit. Have you ever heard of something called the GIGO syndrome? That stands for "Garbage in. Garbage out." You belief that "multivariate analyses" somehow proves the garbage is not garbage is the sign of profound gullibility and ignorance about science.

 

[bripat9643]

Thread summary:

Trumpflakes are all hilariously stupid, too goddamned stupid to understand what "global" means.

Look at the global map, Trumptards. See how much more red than blue there is? That's _global_ warming. If you need that explained in smaller words, you're out of luck, being how I don't speak retard.

With these partisan hacks not only does party come before country it also comes before self or science. Nothing matters to them but the party.

You're the partisan hack, snowflake. You're just too stupid and gullible to realize it.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Voters have a say, they have their say via voting for an individual to represent them. As is pointed out often, we are not a democracy so you do not get to vote on each individual law.

But again, I am glad that there was not enough morons like you back in the 70 and 80s. Sadly your kind, who put party before all else, have multiplied like rabbits since those days.

Our representatives didn't even vote on these regulations, moron. The EPA simply imposed them without any input from Congress or the public whatsoever.

Is there any science you do not deny? I wonder if you still use leeches since you are so afraid of science. I am actually surprised that you even acknowledge the fact the internet exist.

Are you also a flat earther? Do you belive the moon landing was a hoax?

Only an obedient drone would blindly trust government sources for what he believes.

I do not blindly trust anything. Have you ever taken the datasets for climate change and ran them through a program like SPSS or R and perform multivariate analyses to see what the numbers have to say?

What actual research have you done on the topic of climate change? What scientific journals on the subject have you read? Have you ever done anything more than just parrot the GOP talking points on the subject?

Amazing someone like you would have the balls to accuse someone else of blind acceptance.

What are the "data sets for climate change?" You mean the temperature records that so-called "climate scientists" have doctored and homogenized beyond recognition? If you take a ball of manure and cover it with frosting, it still tastes like shit. Have you ever heard of something called the GIGO syndrome? That stands for "Garbage in. Garbage out." You belief that "multivariate analyses" somehow proves the garbage is not garbage is the sign of profound gullibility and ignorance about science.

So, in other words you have never looked at any of the data or the evidence and just parrot the GOP talking points. Thanks for clearing that up!

 

[bripat9643]

Even this week’s cold weather is probably being caused at least in part by global warming

WTF? These morons are insane.

That's the sign of the terminally gullible.

 

[bripat9643]

Thread summary:

Trumpflakes are all hilariously stupid, too goddamned stupid to understand what "global" means.

Look at the global map, Trumptards. See how much more red than blue there is? That's _global_ warming. If you need that explained in smaller words, you're out of luck, being how I don't speak retard.

What brain damaged morons like you fail to understand is that the data used to make the map is all fake. You see a map and you automatically believe it presents valid information. That's the sure sign of a dupe.

 

[bripat9643]

Our representatives didn't even vote on these regulations, moron. The EPA simply imposed them without any input from Congress or the public whatsoever.

Is there any science you do not deny? I wonder if you still use leeches since you are so afraid of science. I am actually surprised that you even acknowledge the fact the internet exist.

Are you also a flat earther? Do you belive the moon landing was a hoax?

Only an obedient drone would blindly trust government sources for what he believes.

I do not blindly trust anything. Have you ever taken the datasets for climate change and ran them through a program like SPSS or R and perform multivariate analyses to see what the numbers have to say?

What actual research have you done on the topic of climate change? What scientific journals on the subject have you read? Have you ever done anything more than just parrot the GOP talking points on the subject?

Amazing someone like you would have the balls to accuse someone else of blind acceptance.

What are the "data sets for climate change?" You mean the temperature records that so-called "climate scientists" have doctored and homogenized beyond recognition? If you take a ball of manure and cover it with frosting, it still tastes like shit. Have you ever heard of something called the GIGO syndrome? That stands for "Garbage in. Garbage out." You belief that "multivariate analyses" somehow proves the garbage is not garbage is the sign of profound gullibility and ignorance about science.

So, in other words you have never looked at any of the data or the evidence and just parrot the GOP talking points. Thanks for clearing that up!

Go to the climateaudit.org site and you can see all the data you like. Mcintyre and Mckitrick proved it's all horseshit.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Is there any science you do not deny? I wonder if you still use leeches since you are so afraid of science. I am actually surprised that you even acknowledge the fact the internet exist.

Are you also a flat earther? Do you belive the moon landing was a hoax?

Only an obedient drone would blindly trust government sources for what he believes.

I do not blindly trust anything. Have you ever taken the datasets for climate change and ran them through a program like SPSS or R and perform multivariate analyses to see what the numbers have to say?

What actual research have you done on the topic of climate change? What scientific journals on the subject have you read? Have you ever done anything more than just parrot the GOP talking points on the subject?

Amazing someone like you would have the balls to accuse someone else of blind acceptance.

What are the "data sets for climate change?" You mean the temperature records that so-called "climate scientists" have doctored and homogenized beyond recognition? If you take a ball of manure and cover it with frosting, it still tastes like shit. Have you ever heard of something called the GIGO syndrome? That stands for "Garbage in. Garbage out." You belief that "multivariate analyses" somehow proves the garbage is not garbage is the sign of profound gullibility and ignorance about science.

So, in other words you have never looked at any of the data or the evidence and just parrot the GOP talking points. Thanks for clearing that up!

Go to the climateaudit.org site and you can see all the data you like. Mcintyre and Mckitrick proved it's all horseshit.

That explains much about you...

site:realclimate.org McIntyre - Google Search

Skeptical Science Search Results

 

[bripat9643]

Only an obedient drone would blindly trust government sources for what he believes.

I do not blindly trust anything. Have you ever taken the datasets for climate change and ran them through a program like SPSS or R and perform multivariate analyses to see what the numbers have to say?

What actual research have you done on the topic of climate change? What scientific journals on the subject have you read? Have you ever done anything more than just parrot the GOP talking points on the subject?

Amazing someone like you would have the balls to accuse someone else of blind acceptance.

What are the "data sets for climate change?" You mean the temperature records that so-called "climate scientists" have doctored and homogenized beyond recognition? If you take a ball of manure and cover it with frosting, it still tastes like shit. Have you ever heard of something called the GIGO syndrome? That stands for "Garbage in. Garbage out." You belief that "multivariate analyses" somehow proves the garbage is not garbage is the sign of profound gullibility and ignorance about science.

So, in other words you have never looked at any of the data or the evidence and just parrot the GOP talking points. Thanks for clearing that up!

Go to the climateaudit.org site and you can see all the data you like. Mcintyre and Mckitrick proved it's all horseshit.

That explains much about you...

site:realclimate.org McIntyre - Google Search

Skeptical Science Search Results

Realclimate.org is a site run by Michael Mann, the con artist who massaged bogus data into the infamous hockey stick.

It's no surprise that you would resort to ad hominem attacks by the climate con artists in an attempt to discredit a well researched analysis of the data.

You're a typical global warming cult member.

 

[mamooth]

What brain damaged morons like you fail to understand is that the data used to make the map is all fake.

What you Stalinist cult shriekers fail to understand is that when all you have is bedwetting conspiracy theories, it means you're just making stupid crap up.

All you have is bedwetting conspiracy theories. That means you're just making stupid crap up. And everyone knows it, which is why everyone keeps laughing so hard at your hysterics.

You're beyond help, Bri. No matter what the evidence is, you automatically say it's faked. At this point, the only useful purpose you serve is as an illustration of how cult devotion will cause a person to self-lobotomize.

 

[MACAULAY]

The Washinton Post--1922

Now, there is a reliable newspaper---bought out of near Bankruptcy by the turd Jeff Bezos to push his political agenda. It says, in 1922:

"The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consulafft, at Bergen, Norway.


Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared."

_________________________________________________-

Was Al Gore around in 1922? Seems so---who else would try to sell: ....seals are finding the water too hot

Global Warming: 1922

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I do not blindly trust anything. Have you ever taken the datasets for climate change and ran them through a program like SPSS or R and perform multivariate analyses to see what the numbers have to say?

What actual research have you done on the topic of climate change? What scientific journals on the subject have you read? Have you ever done anything more than just parrot the GOP talking points on the subject?

Amazing someone like you would have the balls to accuse someone else of blind acceptance.

What are the "data sets for climate change?" You mean the temperature records that so-called "climate scientists" have doctored and homogenized beyond recognition? If you take a ball of manure and cover it with frosting, it still tastes like shit. Have you ever heard of something called the GIGO syndrome? That stands for "Garbage in. Garbage out." You belief that "multivariate analyses" somehow proves the garbage is not garbage is the sign of profound gullibility and ignorance about science.

So, in other words you have never looked at any of the data or the evidence and just parrot the GOP talking points. Thanks for clearing that up!

Go to the climateaudit.org site and you can see all the data you like. Mcintyre and Mckitrick proved it's all horseshit.

That explains much about you...

site:realclimate.org McIntyre - Google Search

Skeptical Science Search Results

Realclimate.org is a site run by Michael Mann, the con artist who massaged bogus data into the infamous hockey stick.

It's no surprise that you would resort to ad hominem attacks by the climate con artists in an attempt to discredit a well researched analysis of the data.

You're a typical global warming cult member.

And climateaudit is ran by Steve McIntyre a mining executive and consultant that has a vested interest in debunking anything that hurts his profits.

It is no surprise that you would turn to him, he is the GOP go-to guy.

 

[bripat9643]

What are the "data sets for climate change?" You mean the temperature records that so-called "climate scientists" have doctored and homogenized beyond recognition? If you take a ball of manure and cover it with frosting, it still tastes like shit. Have you ever heard of something called the GIGO syndrome? That stands for "Garbage in. Garbage out." You belief that "multivariate analyses" somehow proves the garbage is not garbage is the sign of profound gullibility and ignorance about science.

So, in other words you have never looked at any of the data or the evidence and just parrot the GOP talking points. Thanks for clearing that up!

Go to the climateaudit.org site and you can see all the data you like. Mcintyre and Mckitrick proved it's all horseshit.

That explains much about you...

site:realclimate.org McIntyre - Google Search

Skeptical Science Search Results

Realclimate.org is a site run by Michael Mann, the con artist who massaged bogus data into the infamous hockey stick.

It's no surprise that you would resort to ad hominem attacks by the climate con artists in an attempt to discredit a well researched analysis of the data.

You're a typical global warming cult member.

And climateaudit is ran by Steve McIntyre a mining executive and consultant that has a vested interest in debunking anything that hurts his profits.

It is no surprise that you would turn to him, he is the GOP go-to guy.

Every so-called "climate scientist" is on the government payroll, and the government has a vested interest in raising our taxes and gaining control over our use of energy. Snowflakes are too stupid to understand that their ad hominem attacks are more appropiately used against the con artists they support than climate sketics.

 

[IanC]

McIntyre was a top flight mathematics student who left academia to go into the mining industry to support his family. He became an expert in all areas but especially in auditing prospectus to stop cheats from 'adjusting' the test samples to claim better finds.

At the turn of the millennium every Canadian household got a pamphlet ginning up concern about global warming. McIntyre read it and his well honed BS detector pegged at maximum.

So he politely asked for the data that the hockey stick was based on. He spent the next decade pointing out flaws in the statistics (his speciality), and trying to wrestle the data away from the authors and journals who published flawed papers for public consumption.

Reproducibility is a keystone for science. If a paper can't be repeated by a third party then it is useless. The Climategate emails, especially the most damaging ones, showed a clear picture of how data was being hidden from outsiders, and publication in journals was being controlled by the climate science elite.

McIntyre is not a climate scientist although he has made himself an expert on the stats behind it. His efforts in being a watchdog have slowed the crazy train of unsupported conclusions from cherrypicked and misused data.

He deserves to be named an upstanding citizen of the world for his unpaid hours of work in a thankless job.