Just a head's up OP- Toro will hold it against you, that you're his better, until the end of time or he goes to st. Elsewhere.
Of course he's better. At being Toro.
Not asking him to change what he is,
but just to do the job right!
If you are going to bulldoze through bullcrap online
you can't be standing in it.
We need bulldozers like Toro, and like you when you find a target that needs hard hitting.
But we cannot go around bulldozing down each other off track,
especially when we're on the same team!
In football, you don't block, tackle or SACK your own quarterback!
I'm sorry, I don't mean any offense, but I barely remember who you are.
I'm the "universal inclusion" chick who believes in working with all people of
all parties and groups, religious political etc, to succeed effectively in their respective roles and elements.
So I generally drive everyone to the limit
with talk of mediation, conflict resolution, restorative justice, spiritual healing,
consensus building, cooperative economics, microlending, building campuses
and teaching hospitals for sustainable education and services that are locally owned and managed,
blah blah blah.
I may have confused you with someone else, I apologize.
I remember you from the thread on the misuse a homophone.
And you were having fun messing with people or the OP or that thread
but there was a real concern not to derail it by getting too off topic.
From your cartoon I thought you were the same type of
Hit and Run
poster, just stirring things up or slamming something down,
but not into interacting to talk it out point by point like I do, or overdo it.
Some people are like that, just heavy hitters and not
into working out the details.
So it's like a football team or orchestra,
where each person has a certain job to do or role to play.
And we help each other use our styles or skills to be effective
and get somewhere with it.
Sorry if I pegged you wrong.
I need to learn to be more like you, dot com and others
who just post and don't give flip how the other person processes it.
I tend to work with people "relatively" so it takes one-on-one
interaction and each person and process is unique to that interaction.
Like a unique line connecting two points.
most people want to apply a general rule to a whole group
and be done with it. But that always leaves out exceptions
or people who dissent and have a better way.
So I'd rather listen to those objections and find the better way
instead of slapping blanket rules, labels, or statements on people.
I'd rather interact and work it out where the people shape
and create the policies and solutions together, using all
their input where nobody is left out.
So all this blah blah blah
should be a good sample of how I post on here
that has good points to it, and a bad side, too,
when it gets to be too much for people. Sorry!
But you can see I'm the opposite of you and dot com.
I need to learn to do the
"WHAM BAM F U TOO!!!!"
and not try to make peace or reconcile with every issue....