Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you, Maryland Governor Larry Hogan for taking lead to Re-fund” the police. Hogan spoke out immediately a couple of years ago when the ludicrous notion that reducing funding for the police would decrease crime. As he stated, it was an utter failure. The stats speak for themselves.
Biden doesn't want to defund the police, so there, and defund the police is null and void.Thank you, Maryland Governor Larry Hogan for taking lead to Re-fund” the police. Hogan spoke out immediately a couple of years ago when the ludicrous notion that reducing funding for the police would decrease crime. As he stated, it was an utter failure. The stats speak for themselves.
You may have misread. He said....Biden doesn't want to defund the police, so there, and defund the police is null and void.
although most democrats have advocated for defunding police, and it hasn't gone well in most cities that have adopted this.Maryland Governor Larry Hogan
You are correct about Biden but that phrase should have never been uttered at any level… it certainly did not come from conservative voices. The demonization of the police nationwide caused more harm vs. simply addressing a small crop of bad seeds. We have seen crime escalate and police staff and recruitment decline.Biden doesn't want to defund the police, so there, and defund the police is null and void.
Where and when did crime go away? Been to Baltimore recently? That phrase and campaign exacerbated a bad situation to worse just so some Democrats could score points with their radical base.Few if any police have actually been defunded.
Crime went go anyway. Go figure. It’s almost as if we are burning the money in a ditch.
O'Biden don't know what he wants. Hell, he don't even know where he's at.Biden doesn't want to defund the police, so there, and defund the police is null and void.
Hogan spoke out immediately a couple of years ago when the ludicrous notion that reducing funding for the police would decrease crime.You may have misread. He said....
although most democrats have advocated for defunding police, and it hasn't gone well in most cities that have adopted this.
and where is your link?Thank you, Maryland Governor Larry Hogan for taking lead to Re-fund” the police. Hogan spoke out immediately a couple of years ago when the ludicrous notion that reducing funding for the police would decrease crime. As he stated, it was an utter failure. The stats speak for themselves.
It’s not radical to be opposed to racist policing and police brutality without accountability.Where and when did crime go away? Been to Baltimore recently? That phrase and campaign exacerbated a bad situation to worse just so some Democrats could score points with their radical base.
Few if any police have actually been defunded.
Crime went go anyway. Go figure. It’s almost as if we are burning the money in a ditch.
www.secureamericanow.org
It caused an increase in violence. I disagree there was a widespread police brutality issue, but even if so, trading one violence for another is a failure.It was all a part of a much bigger effort to curtail police brutality, and the overall effort bore some fruit.
At least so far as it stands in the present political climate. That may change as politics could change back to restore the police's assumed rights as was demonstrated by Chauvin.
The details can offer a worthwhile discussion.
I wouldn't argue that isn't correct. There could have been a police backlash that I'm not aware of. However, at the same time there was a message sent to police that similar incidents such as 'Chauvin's' would no longer be tolerated by the law.It caused an increase in violence.
Then what were the police reacting to if not the 'backlash' you suggest above?I disagree there was a widespread police brutality issue,
Yes, agreed. What are you suggesting was traded? Are you suggesting that defunding the police was violence?but even if so, trading one violence for another is a failure.
It’s not radical to be opposed to racist policing and police brutality without accountability.
It’s deplorable to look the other way.
www.ny1.com
The DemoKKKrats don't want a reduction in crime. Crime is what keeps them in power. Defunding the police was the DemoKKKrats' attempt to gain more power through fear (just like their Covid insanity).
Defunding itself is not violent, but if you look at the link in my earlier post there was a large increase in crime/violent crime in the "defund the police" cities. And, yes, there were instances where the police made mistakes, or did things they shouldn't. However, that does not mean you punish the collective group when they are majority upstanding individuals that protect us with their lives every day.I wouldn't argue that isn't correct. There could have been a police backlash that I'm not aware of. However, at the same time there was a message sent to police that similar incidents such as 'Chauvin's' would no longer be tolerated by the law.
Then what were the police reacting to if not the 'backlash' you suggest above?
Yes, agreed. What are you suggesting was traded? Are you suggesting that defunding the police was violence?
