rtwngAvngr
Senior Member
- Jan 5, 2004
- 15,755
- 513
- 48
- Banned
- #1
Which is more important in the long term success, sovereignty, and security of the United States, defending israel or closing the border?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which is more important in the long term success, sovereignty, and security of the U.S. of the United Stated, defending israel or closing the border?
Which is more important in the long term success, sovereignty, and security of the U.S. of the United Stated, defending israel or closing the border?
Easy---closing the border. Israel can take care of itself in spite of the fact that people continue to think they lost the skirmish with the Hizbullys.
Hmmm...are they mutually exclusive?
Given your well publicized feelings on Israel, I suspect you are looking for a heated debate fostered by what could be viewed as a deliberate troll.
They're not necessarily mutually exclusive, but judging from this administrations actions, one might think they were.
Which is MORE important, in your view?
This is NOT a troll. I'm asking people to really analyze whether American security is really the neocon goal. It's just a question.
Easy---closing the border. Israel can take care of itself in spite of the fact that people continue to think they lost the skirmish with the Hizbullys.
They're not necessarily mutually exclusive, but judging from this administrations actions, one might think they were.
Which is MORE important, in your view?
I think both are equally important (not a choice in your poll). International relations and foriegn policy have as much an impact (sometimes more) as secure borders.
As for the administration, illegal immigration and the failure of this administration to address the issue is a HUGE negative in their standing with me. Unfortunately, I dont think the Dems offer anything any different. Neither seems to want to come to grips with the issue and neither is offering any effective and efficient means to curb the flood of illegals. That makes them all a bunch of spineless carpetbaggers in my book.
pretty much, we need to take care of home instead of caring about other nations.
I'm asking you to Prioritize. Choose one. Let's say there were resource constraints and we could only afford one. Which would you choose?
National security is not a single issue. It is affected and impacted by many many things including the actions of foreign nations and foriegn institutions. The US was mostly isolationist pre-WW II and we paid for that in blood and treasure.
um ok well this is 2006 and there is a huge problem w/ the U.s having their board open
Not gonna do it...my view is that both are equally important. Your hypothetical will lead nowhere except to a heated debate over an artificially constructed and constrained scenario. I believe the US has the resources to handle both at the same time; IF the politicians and the citizens had the will power!
Debates such as this thread lead to that philosophy and I think that is just plain wrong.
So much for free speech and open discussion, eh, csm.
There are other threads discussing other issues on this forum.
Debate is wrong? What is wrong with you?
So much for free speech and open discussion, eh, csm.
There are other threads discussing other issues on this forum.
Debate is wrong? What is wrong with you?
Yes.
And there you you have the real impetus behind the poll.