montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,104
- 280
You are quoting from a Zionist propaganda document, not Resolution A/364. Quit making things up.
Now it's a Zionist propaganda document? Why would a resolution be more accurate on population counts?
Of course a Zionist propaganda site will not be objective, A/364 is based on a detailed Survey, called the Survey of Palestine that was commissioned by the UN and performed by the Anglo-American Commission of Inquiry. The Zionist site you link to is designed to justify, through lies, the eviction and expropriation of the Muslims and Christians of Palestine by the European Jews. If you are propagating Zionist lies and propaganda too appear "moderate" to the Zionists that post here, that's up to you, but the Zionists will not consider you in any different way. The facts are the facts, and they won't be found on partisan sites.
Despite it being a "Zionist propaganda site" in your terms - it also debunks the claim that there was massive Arab migration into Palestine and associated claim that the Palestinians are mostly immigrants not native people. I find it amusing that both sides claim it's wrong.
Official LON and UN documents debunk the Zionists claim that non-Jews immigrated to Palestine. They make it clear that the mass immigration/invasion of Palestine was Jewish. What's false is the claim that Jews did not displace the native population. If they hadn't, there would not have been a conflict. Ahad Ha'am (ne' Ginsburg) an early Zionist complained about the Jews driving off Arabs on lands they had used for pasteur and agriculture for centuries.
There was immigration on both sides - Jewish and Arabs, for different reasons. The origins of the conflict were not displacement but in having a Jewish state there in the first place. The Arabs were not willing to allow a Jewish state in Muslim lands. Arab population in Palestine increased at the same time Jewish population did - so how could there have been displacement? It only became displacement later when Israel innacted various laws that allowed them to more easily confiscate property and that made it more difficult for Palestinians to reclaim property and easier for Jews to reclaim property. But the immigration - on both sides, did not displace people.
There was hardly any non-Jew immigration to Palestine. Why do you keep repeating that lie? And, the Muslims and Christians rightfully did not want a foreign population to establish a state in the land they and their ancestors had lived on for thousands of years. The Palestinians were Muslims and Christians, they wanted a secular state.
"(b) IMMIGRATION AND NATURAL INCREASE
15. These changes in the population have been brought about by two forces: natural increase and immigration. The great increase in the Jewish population is due in the main to immigration. From 1920 to 1946, the total number of recorded Jewish immigrants into Palestine was about 376,000, or an average of over 8,000 per year. The flow has not been regular, however, being fairly high in 1924 to 1926, falling in the next few years (there was a net emigration in 1927) and rising to even higher levels between 1933 and 1936 as a result of the Nazi persecution in Europe. Between the census year of 1931 and the year 1936, the proportion of Jews to the total population rose from 18 per cent to nearly 30 per cent.
16. The Arab population has increased almost entirely as a result of an excess of births over deaths.
A/364 of 3 September 1947