Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Practically Accuses Scott Walker Of Assaulting Women

Debbie is a stinking fool, of course.
But the fact that no one in the Democrat Party, or the women's movement, objected to this is testimony to the fact that they have no moral standing whatsoever. None.
They don't object because the idiot Tpublicfools allowed the vawa to expire and than fought like crazy to weaken it and make it null and void for huge segments of the women's population. The Republicans, guided by the radical extremest T baggers objected to renewing or strengthening the bill that gave protection to women who were beat up by drunken or crazy or just plain mean boy friends and husbands. Now the idiots are angry because a women politician spoke badly of one of their leaders. Republicans want men to be given a break when they punch out and kick the crap out of their women, buy whine when a women speaks harshly about them.
What does any of that crap have to do with Scott Walker?
The Democrat elected by the House Dem's is putting the spotlight on the Republican war on women. Walker is a Republican.
Wasserman-Shultz has a long history of playing fast and loose with the truth. She's done it so many times on so many issues that it's hard to see her as anything other than the Democrat's propaganda minister. When she get's caught lying and is called out on it she hides behind talking points that she repeats over and over again while refusing to answer questions about what she was untruthful about.
 
A leading spokesperson for women who has a large following goes negative on a Republican official and the Republican men answer with crude insults about her appearance, and motivations while they insist there is no war on women. True story.
That's not a war.

Besides, in this case who went below the belt first?

I figure if she wants to start rolling in the mud she outta know she's gonna get muddy.
 
Debbie is a stinking fool, of course.
But the fact that no one in the Democrat Party, or the women's movement, objected to this is testimony to the fact that they have no moral standing whatsoever. None.
They don't object because the idiot Tpublicfools allowed the vawa to expire and than fought like crazy to weaken it and make it null and void for huge segments of the women's population. The Republicans, guided by the radical extremest T baggers objected to renewing or strengthening the bill that gave protection to women who were beat up by drunken or crazy or just plain mean boy friends and husbands. Now the idiots are angry because a women politician spoke badly of one of their leaders. Republicans want men to be given a break when they punch out and kick the crap out of their women, buy whine when a women speaks harshly about them.
What does any of that crap have to do with Scott Walker?
The Democrat elected by the House Dem's is putting the spotlight on the Republican war on women. Walker is a Republican.
Wasserman-Shultz has a long history of playing fast and loose with the truth. She's done it so many times on so many issues that it's hard to see her as anything other than the Democrat's propaganda minister. When she get's caught lying and is called out on it she hides behind talking points that she repeats over and over again while refusing to answer questions about what she was untruthful about.
This time she'll hide behind her gender.
 
It's political reality that all political parties have people like Wasserman-Shultz that distort the truth to hurt their political adversaries but what's disturbing about Debbie's complete disregard for the truth is that she's the Head of the DNC.
 
Some of her lies have been so blatant that even usually compliant media outlets like CNN and NBC have been forced to call her out on them. When you've got Wolf Blitzer, Don Lemon, Andrea Mitchell and Anderson Cooper all calling a liberal a liar on air...then you KNOW that the person they are calling out has been telling some whoppers!
 
Google "Debbie Wasserman-Shultz caught lying" and see how many hits you get.
What does that mean? I tried it and got the number 244,000. It means nothing. It's just a search engine combining words for random answers. I did a google on "george washington caught lying" and got 7,900,000 references.
Debbie just knows how to push buttons. She wants lots of PR. As long as the statement ends up in the press and on cable news with Republicans whining in the back ground she will drink champagne and laugh with her supporters.
 
What lie did little debbie tell that pissed off Republiteas the most?
 
Google "Debbie Wasserman-Shultz caught lying" and see how many hits you get.
What does that mean? I tried it and got the number 244,000. It means nothing. It's just a search engine combining words for random answers. I did a google on "george washington caught lying" and got 7,900,000 references.
Debbie just knows how to push buttons. She wants lots of PR. As long as the statement ends up in the press and on cable news with Republicans whining in the back ground she will drink champagne and laugh with her supporters.

Ah, so telling lies is defined now as "pushing buttons"? Got it...
 
Debbie is a stinking fool, of course.
But the fact that no one in the Democrat Party, or the women's movement, objected to this is testimony to the fact that they have no moral standing whatsoever. None.
They don't object because the idiot Tpublicfools allowed the vawa to expire and than fought like crazy to weaken it and make it null and void for huge segments of the women's population. The Republicans, guided by the radical extremest T baggers objected to renewing or strengthening the bill that gave protection to women who were beat up by drunken or crazy or just plain mean boy friends and husbands. Now the idiots are angry because a women politician spoke badly of one of their leaders. Republicans want men to be given a break when they punch out and kick the crap out of their women, buy whine when a women speaks harshly about them.
What does any of that crap have to do with Scott Walker?
The Democrat elected by the House Dem's is putting the spotlight on the Republican war on women. Walker is a Republican.
It's all fake. There is no war other than the war Democrats constantly conduct on our patience.
Ya right, the 12% to 14% margin of women voting for Obama in 2012 didn't mean a thing and had nothing to do with stupid anti women and derogatory remarks about women by Republicans. And all the vagina probing proposed legislation and focus on restricting women's medical rights and independence from government control wasn't a "war on woman". Keep telling yourselves that.
Women tend to vote Dem anyway. Maybe because they're easily misled. I dunno.
But it is undoubted that Democrat policies have made women's lives harder: less economic opportunity, more government dependence,less availability of medical services.


A lot of women are looking for someone to take care of them. If they don't have a man, then government is a good substitute. Consider the fact that over 70% of black children are illegitimate. Their mothers are not married. These women are all sucking on the government tit. It's not surprising that women vote Democrat more than men.
 

Forum List

Back
Top