Debate on the deeper purposes of the Iran war, taking down China and the aftermath by Marc Faber and Brent Johnson.

[Invisibleflash]

Debate on the deeper purposes of the Iran war, taking down China and the aftermath by Marc Faber and Brent Johnson.

Topics discussed in video:

One side of the debate argues for America's flourishing and growth from these endless wars and taking out all competitors. The other side of the debate argues for the downfall of America from endless wars and the rest of their agenda.

The Fort Knox scenario as shown in the Goldfinger movie is applied to crude oil. (You don't have to take possession or own it...you just have to make it unavailable permanently.)

China won't allow world domination and control of crude oil by the USA. The USA won't allow China to surpass it as the global hegemon and shutting off China's crude oil imports is the best method to do that. So, something will have to give.

They debate if the war on Iran will be successful. Or even if it is only a partial success, will it still be a success for America in achieving their goals.

Russia won't be able to supply all of China's energy needs because the infrastructure is not there and will take years to build it. And even then, Russia is on the chopping block for the USA to destabilize and destroy. Once achieved, China's ability to import crude oil at all will be accomplished.

 

[shockedcanadian]

This taking down of China is precisely why NATO countries will not get involved. America may one day become beholden to China you are not there yet. Most of Europe is though some are starting to realize the danger that would lead to, there are some I suspect are VERY close to China...in a way U.S intel should be concerned...

 

[PeterPilot]

Taking down China???

Iran and China have come out, at least temporarily, on top.

The deeper purpose was the advancement of Greater Israel.