how many of them have 300 million people in a country as big as we are to take care of?.....just askingPay now, or pay later. That's the reality of health care. No one is getting out of this alive and people who don't worry about access to health care live a lot longer and happier than those who do!
""""(CNN) — Norwegians have more reason than ever to celebrate the International Day of Happiness.
After ranking fourth for the last two years, Norway jumped three spots and displaced three-time winner Denmark to take the title of "world's happiest country" for the first time.
Denmark dropped to second place this year, followed by Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Netherlands, Canada, New Zealand and Australia and Sweden (which tied for ninth place), according to the latest World Happiness Report, released Monday by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network for the United Nations."""
Fact: All of those countries listed above have universal health care, too.
List of countries with universal health care - Wikipedia
China has universal health care, which is ranked higher than the USA, AND they have a larger population than the US.
You too could have universal health care and for a LOT less money than you're currently paying. Single payer would eliminate 25% of your current costs which are eaten up by administration and insurance company profits. Doctors wouldn't need third party billing companies or staff to obtain pre-approvals.
And then there is the reality of the Chinese care. You see there is a huge difference between what is claimed, and what is actually happening.
"Though China's extensive 2008 reforms are still in process, a number of problems, mostly concerning tertiary hospital care, continue to challenge its leadership. First, many of the country's publicly owned but profit-driven tertiary hospitals successfully resisted the latest reform efforts — a reality that probably reflects the hospitals' power within China's political system. As a result, frustrated authorities sought to use market forces once again to bring the hospital sector into line. In 2012, the leadership announced that they would invite private investors to own up to 20% of China's hospitals by 2015, double the preexisting rate.4
Second, major inequities continue between the health care available in poor rural areas and that in more affluent cities.5 Third, China continues to struggle with creating a high-quality, trusted, professionalized physician workforce. One legacy of China's market experiment is a widespread perception that physicians put their economic welfare ahead of patients' interests.
Though China's health care system is still rapidly evolving, several potentially useful lessons emerge from its recent history. The first is that in low-income countries, and perhaps high-income ones as well, community health workers such as China's barefoot doctors can significantly improve the health status of local populations.
Second, relying largely on markets to fund and distribute health services creates risks that need careful consideration. Though government price setting created market distortions, these do not fully explain the problems with quality, access, and cost that China experienced in the second phase of its recent history. Health care is subject to serious market failures. Asymmetries in information between patients and health care providers make it difficult for patients to make sound choices in free health care markets, and patients' lesser knowledge may be exploited by clinicians. Patients' resulting vulnerability, resentment, and distrust can be socially destabilizing — and may intensify when patients are heavily exposed to the costs of care, as they were until recently in China.
MMS: Error