ReinyDays
Gold Member
Gravity is why we bother with engineers ... carpenters are too stupid ... the most we can master is trig, though few do ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Gravity is why we bother with engineers ... carpenters are too stupid ... the most we can master is trig, though few do ...
I have a J.D. from Duquesne University, thank you very much.Yes, sounds like a great idea who know nothing about education. I think some personal bias is evident ere. Let us guess you education level, I would say it was a high school diploma but a few college courses at best. You don't show the motivation to get a college degree, hence your bias to wards those who you think are less smart than you, but hold a paper saying they are.
What do do about people who do not test well? My daughter had to take remedial math in college, despite crushing it in high school, simply because she did poorly on the college assessment test. . She aced the course and the proceeded to make good grades the next two years in her math classes. On the other hand, my SAT and ACT scores were so high, I started without the intro course and then onward to engineering and computer science classes.
I have a J.D. from Duquesne University, thank you very much.
I do not accept the proposition that there are "smart" people who do not do well on tests. Most standardized tests have been developed over DECADES to reflect exactly what they purport to reflect. In my own experience, people who claim that they "don't do well on written tests," are not as "smart"as they think they are. Unless you are dyslexic, your test results will be valid.
As for Math, I only have anecdotal information, but I suspect there has been a movement over the past thirty years or so to shift grading in Math from a quantitative measure to a "feel good" measure, so that girls will get better grades than boys, which always drives female teachers crazy. So HS Math grades reflect things like "effort," neatness, and other irrelevancies. Standardized tests do not reflect that foolishness. As for college "Math," we all know that courses are available that actually require little facility with mathematical concepts.
I have a J.D. from Duquesne University, thank you very much.
I do not accept the proposition that there are "smart" people who do not do well on tests. Most standardized tests have been developed over DECADES to reflect exactly what they purport to reflect. In my own experience, people who claim that they "don't do well on written tests," are not as "smart"as they think they are. Unless you are dyslexic, your test results will be valid.
As for Math, I only have anecdotal information, but I suspect there has been a movement over the past thirty years or so to shift grading in Math from a quantitative measure to a "feel good" measure, so that girls will get better grades than boys, which always drives female teachers crazy. So HS Math grades reflect things like "effort," neatness, and other irrelevancies. Standardized tests do not reflect that foolishness. As for college "Math," we all know that courses are available that actually require little facility with mathematical concepts.
I still say, the Dept of Education should create a comprehensive general knowledge and intelligence test, the score of which would indicate the test-taker's education equivalency.
That's idiotic.Let's see...where's the logic here...I went to school, full time, for about 20 years, and yet...you say I know nothing about education. Hmmm.
You say that there are a significant number of people who are "smart," but don't do well on tests, and there's no data to prove it. I wonder why. The only way to prove it would be to GIVE THEM A TEST!
I still say, the Dept of Education should create a comprehensive general knowledge and intelligence test, the score of which would indicate the test-taker's education equivalency. Loads of Leftist college grads would get a very unwelcome surprise.
So...you did not read the post you quoted.Yes, sounds like a great idea who know nothing about education. I think some personal bias is evident ere. Let us guess you education level, I would say it was a high school diploma but a few college courses at best. You don't show the motivation to get a college degree, hence your bias to wards those who you think are less smart than you, but hold a paper saying they are.
What do do about people who do not test well? My daughter had to take remedial math in college, despite crushing it in high school, simply because she did poorly on the college assessment test. . She aced the course and the proceeded to make good grades the next two years in her math classes. On the other hand, my SAT and ACT scores were so high, I started without the intro course and then onward to engineering and computer science classes.
Never contradict the midshipman. He KNOWS ALL!Let's see...where's the logic here...I went to school, full time, for about 20 years, and yet...you say I know nothing about education. Hmmm.
You say that there are a significant number of people who are "smart," but don't do well on tests, and there's no data to prove it. I wonder why. The only way to prove it would be to GIVE THEM A TEST!
I still say, the Dept of Education should create a comprehensive general knowledge and intelligence test, the score of which would indicate the test-taker's education equivalency. Loads of Leftist college grads would get a very unwelcome surprise.
AgreeMost jobs simply don't require a college degree. This is an archaic belief by the Boomer generation who keep pushing this idea that without a college degree you're a loser. They did my generation and others a great disservice by making us believe this. Now you've got thousands of young adults with $100k in debt and little to show for it. Unless you are going into a specialty field, a high school diploma or a basic two-year Associate Degree is plenty adequate to perform most jobs in corporate America. I have an MBA, but I would estimate 90% of what I do today I learned doing on the job.
I've ridden buses for more than twice that time. Does that make me a bus driver? Or a mechanic?Let's see...where's the logic here...I went to school, full time, for about 20 years, and yet...you say I know nothing about education. Hmmm.
....
Yes, why? I addressed the incredible lack of intelligence illustrated in that post. Did you miss that?So...you did not read the post you quoted.