DC Pipe Bomber's Family Worked to Free Illegals from ICE, Sued the Trump Admin, And Used Trayvon Martin's Lawyer to Fight "Racism"

He knew people would be in the area, that is all he would know.

From the evidence so far it looks like he started work during the Floyd crap, but i guess he wasn't as fast a bomb maker as he thought he was.

The time he set for the bombs to go off would have determined how many people there. Have you seen any indication from the bomber what time he intended the bombs to go off? I have not.
 
The time he set for the bombs to go off would have determined how many people there. Have you seen any indication from the bomber what time he intended the bombs to go off? I have not.

I am more talking about time as in the day selected.

Again, this guy doesn't seem to technically proficient.
 
Yet they are the events on Jan 6.

Absolutely wrong. The rally is not considered part of the “events” of J6 unless you’re saying political rallies are illegal. Are you? Are you saying they were prosecuted for that? Because as far as I know, they were not.

They were prosecuted specifically for the riot and break-in at the Capitol building because THAT was the only illegal activity that day other than truck with weapons.
You're adding words to the pardon that aren't there. You're making the argument the prosecution will make. But those words aren't there.

Why would the pardon include the rally if the rally was not illegal and thus not prosecutable?
Kne guy got a pardon for weapons in his truck that was even further wmaway from the Capitol. How was his truck related to the riot?

At the very least it shows motive to interrupt the vote count at the Capitol building. Placing bombs at the DNC and RNC, however, does not.

We can only speculate about the motive behind the weapons in the truck because the weapons were never removed from the truck or used. But Cole’s motives can be determined by the fact that the bombs were actually planted in specific locations. Just not at the Capitol.
You see the opening.
I saw the opening for Democrats to try to pin incitement on Trump when he did not. For this reason I viewed their actions and motives with suspicion.
 
There was no break in....they were invited in and even waved in by Capital police or those dressed as capital police ..keep the facts straight 👍🏼
I’ve heard both that they broke in and they were invited. However, even if officers invited some in at some point, it doesn’t explain why others broke windows and crawled in that way.

It was a very chaotic and fluid situation and I suspect that both are true to one degree or another.
 
No, sore loser liar, we watched it on live tv. Go cry somewhere where we cant see or hear you, you're embarrassing yourself.
We won the following election fool .... Obviously not enough brain idiots like yourself bought that all that bullshit 👍🏼
 
I’ve heard both that they broke in and they were invited. However, even if officers invited some in at some point, it doesn’t explain why others broke windows and crawled in that way.

It was a very chaotic and fluid situation and I suspect that both are true to one degree or another.
The FBI had almost 300 people in the crowd instigating ...those officers allowed them into the capital building itself. They didn't break into it




 
Send me a copy of that recording , because the only breaking in I saw , they were already in the building... They we're let originally


This video shows people smashing windows and trying to push past officers once inside.

If officers outside did allow people into the building, they forgot to tell officers inside because the officers inside were fighting to keep or get them out. At the very least, they were fighting to prevent them from going any further than the Rotunda.

Here’s another one showing rioters fighting with officers.

WATCH: Jan. 6 committee shows new footage of Capitol attack

I don’t have a grasp on the whole picture but it’s obvious to me that at least some rioters broke in and fought with officers inside and outside.

Having said that, I don’t believe this was a planned insurrection - that it was mob that got out of control - and that prosecution for most of them for insurrection was just a political ploy by Democrats.

I also criticize Democrats for twisting Trump’s rhetoric about “fighting” to mean he was inciting them to invade the Capitol. It was chickenshit and dishonest.
 
Send me a copy of that recording , because the only breaking in I saw , they were already in the building... They we're let originally
So what… 140 cops got injured escorting them around?
 
15th post
The rally is not considered part of the “events” of J6 unless you’re saying political rallies are illegal.
I am saying his lawyers will argue that the pardon covers criminal offenses related to the events of January 6th. What are those "events"? Can you define them? The judge will have to do so, based on the vague language of the pardon.

And then they will argue their client's acts were, indeed, related to those events. And they will argue that his indictment was always "pending", as it means, not "yet indicted".

Will it fly? Place your bets.
 
Last edited:


This video shows people smashing windows and trying to push past officers once inside.

If officers outside did allow people into the building, they forgot to tell officers inside because the officers inside were fighting to keep or get them out. At the very least, they were fighting to prevent them from going any further than the Rotunda.

Here’s another one showing rioters fighting with officers.

WATCH: Jan. 6 committee shows new footage of Capitol attack

I don’t have a grasp on the whole picture but it’s obvious to me that at least some rioters broke in and fought with officers inside and outside.

Having said that, I don’t believe this was a planned insurrection - that it was mob that got out of control - and that prosecution for most of them for insurrection was just a political ploy by Democrats.

I also criticize Democrats for twisting Trump’s rhetoric about “fighting” to mean he was inciting them to invade the Capitol. It was chickenshit and dishonest.



This video shows people smashing windows and trying to push past officers once inside.

If officers outside did allow people into the building, they forgot to tell officers inside because the officers inside were fighting to keep or get them out. At the very least, they were fighting to prevent them from going any further than the Rotunda.

Here’s another one showing rioters fighting with officers.

WATCH: Jan. 6 committee shows new footage of Capitol attack

I don’t have a grasp on the whole picture but it’s obvious to me that at least some rioters broke in and fought with officers inside and outside.

Having said that, I don’t believe this was a planned insurrection - that it was mob that got out of control - and that prosecution for most of them for insurrection was just a political ploy by Democrats.

I also criticize Democrats for twisting Trump’s rhetoric about “fighting” to mean he was inciting them to invade the Capitol. It was chickenshit and dishonest.

this is a selectively edited video, it's like a movie script to me... how do you know that some of 300 FBI agents in the crowd didn't inside the violence to beginning to break windows then everybody win after that?... Still not sure why didn't they release all the , video recordings anyways. They were supposed to do that...

There's a new January 6th commission we'll see what they find out.....all I know is that people with kids and wives at home got their homes raided with armored vehicles and SWAT teams for misdemeanors .
 
So what… 140 cops got injured escorting them around?
Riots happen when you shoot smoke grenades at people and start beating them with billy clubs.... Who were the FBI agents there?..this woman was beaten by police after she was down

 
This is a red herring. I am saying his lawyers will argue that the pardon covers criminal offenses related to the events of January 6th. What are those "events"? Can you define them? The judge will have to do so, based on the vague language of the pardon.

And then they will argue their client's acts were, indeed, related to those events. And they will argue that his indictment was always "pending", as it means, not "yet indicted".

Will it fly? Place your bets.
None of those prosecuted for events on J6 were prosecuted for being at the rally. It would be silly to prosecute now for that and it would be a transparent ploy worthy of amateurs if his defense attempts to get a pardon from it.

If they try, the judge will toss it immediately if he/she is worth their salt.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom