David Hogg's attempt to end Laura Ingraham's career sets dangerous precedent

[Faun]

No, liar. You gloss over the narrative in your post that admits firearms are purchased at gun shows from private dealers without background checks.
You are delusional abour kicking anyones ass.

Again, you anti-civil rights clows trot out the same tired bullshit over and over. You get the shit kicked out of you, then whimper away.

You just fucking said anyone can buy a firearm at a gun show and not be subjected to a background screening by an unlicensed dealer. That’s what you call, kicking our ass. Exactly how senile are you, gramps?

DERP

Same lies from the same retards...

{
The “Gun Show Loophole” demagoguery demonizes these individual collectors and portrays them as the source of all of our troubles. What the gun control lobby wants to confuse the public into supporting is the enactment of laws that require background checks on private sales, transfers or loans of firearms.

Certainly, some individuals do come to gun shows to barter, trade, sell or buy firearms – but they are not dealers any more than those who meet at a gun range and choose to trade. If they were dealers, the ATF would force them to register as federal firearms licensees under existing law. And yes, ATF agents come to every gun show, and even flea markets and other such venues, looking for violations of these laws.

So what is the real purpose of the push to close the “gun show loophole”? Since there is no loophole, the purpose is to convince the public to agree to a law that subject ALL private sales, transfers, or loans of firearms to the background check requirement.

If such a law were in place, you could not loan a firearm to a friend for a weekend hunt, trade guns at the range or give your son a deer rifle without going to a federal firearm licensed dealer to conduct a background check. This extension of government into the private lives of gun owners is meant to cause inconvenience and thereby discourage the ownership of firearms. It will especially discourage the gifting and loaning of firearms so often used to encourage someone to join the shooting community.

What this will not do is slow down the acquisition of firearms by criminals. It is already illegal for even a private individual to transfer a firearm to a felon or other prohibited person.

Many people are unaware that studies show virtually all criminals obtain their firearms through black market transactions on the street. Just as gang members deal in drugs and other contraband, they trade and sell firearms, many of which have been stolen in the first place. These dealers in contraband care nothing about laws and will never conduct background checks. Thus these laws only burden the law abiding citizens with the proposed incursions on their Second Amendment rights.

Mass shootings and the Charleston tragedy are no exception. In a public statement the FBI Director admitted that it was a bureaucratic error that permitted the Charleston shooter to obtain a firearm. Improving the existing system under current law may have helped – but no new intrusions on State and Federal Constitutional rights are necessary. As for other mass shootings occurring across our country, the perpetrators commonly pass background checks when they buy firearms through licensed dealers, and we find many more instances where theft, rather than a private sale, is the source of firearms.}


The Gun Show Loophole Myth

Stop lying, ya loopy old fart. You already admitted there’s a loophole, even if you refuse to believe what you post...

However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.​

Retards and their straw man fallacies.

You're an idiot Li'l Kim.

I know reading is a bit much for you, so watch the videos I posted, you drooling retard.

You’re saying I should ignore what you post? Don’t you know what you post?

However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.​

 

[Faun]

I just gave you a definition of the word, “verbal,” and you still didn’t learn? That’s on you.

But being the kind hearted Liberal I am, I’ll give you another clue.... like many words, the word, “verbal,” has more than one definition. Meaning both yours and mine are valid.

Now then, are ya going to keep trolling or are you going to answer a question that’s relevant to the thread?

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

And I took the link YOU posted, retard.

Verbal, spoken.

What fool you are.

Moron, that was just one of the several definitions my link offered. That doesn’t negate the one I used.

Now there’s two questions you’re refusing to answer...

1) How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

2) Exactly how senile are ya, gramps?

What a fucking retard.

{
ver′bal•ly, adv.
usage.: verbal has had the meaning “spoken” since the late 16th century and is thus synonymous with oral: I wrote amemorandum to confirm the verbal agreement. This use is sometimes criticized for being etymologically incorrect orambiguous, though the context usu. makes the meaning clear: No documents are necessary; a verbal order willsuffice. oral can always be used if the context demands: My lawyer insists on a written contract because oralagreements are too difficult to enforce.}

From your own link - dickwad

Moron, from the link you just provided. The very first definition...

1. Of, relating to, or associated with words

Yes you stupid fuck, but you failed to continue reading.

You truly are a retard.

You probably really are stupid enough to not grasp you have had your ass handed to you..

It’s not my fault you’re too stupid to comprehend that more than 1 definition applies to the word. But then, I'm saying this to the idiot who falsely claimed the usage he posted came from my link — when it didn’t.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Democrat Hitler youth stifling free speech and endorsing censorship.

The bitch can stand on a street corner and bleat as much as she desires. Her right of free speech is intact. Just as the right of her previous sponsors is intact by their choosing to drop their sponsorship of her program.

They dropped her under duress. That’s essentially a threat to speech and anyone who denies that is either stupid or lying.

 

[my2¢]

They dropped her under duress. That’s essentially a threat to speech and anyone who denies that is either stupid or lying.

I'd say she got Kaepernicked.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

They dropped her under duress. That’s essentially a threat to speech and anyone who denies that is either stupid or lying.

I'd say she got Kaepernicked.

I don’t know that Ingraham protested her own free speech and I don’t remember any apology of any sort coming from kaepernick.

 

[Wry Catcher]

[/

QUOTE]
Idiot-gram ^^^ Deplorable Variety.

 

[Wry Catcher]

[

There is no singular definition of fascism, other than it has used the machinations of divide and conquer over a population to gain power, is authoritarian in nature, and its leaders narrowly defines patriotism by attacking those who are different in creed, color or ethnicity. In this case, students who have questioned gun policies.

False, you ignorant Maoist.

Fascism is a system devised by Benito Mussolini, head of the Italian Bolshevik party to "fix" the flaws of Marxism. The primary "flaw" being of course that Vladimir Lenin, rather than he was the ruler of the movement.

Mussolini detailed his system in "Il Fascisti" which you can read here Benito Mussolini (Author of The Doctrine of Fascism)

Perhaps the most poignant quote being "why should the state need to own the means of production when the state owns the owners?"


Mussolini devised a system where all things, including the people, belong to the state. Sounds an awful lot like what you Stalinist democrats promote.

So Wiemar Germany under Hitler, Spain under Franco; Japan under ToJo, or in Chile, Austria, Croatia, Finland, France under Petain, Greece, Norway, Hungry, Portugal, Romania and Yugoslavia are were not fascist countries?

A study of these forms of fascism have an number of commonalities, but also vary from that of Mussolini in Italy and the Nazi Movement in Germany.

For those interested in history, a study of how these nations devolved into fascist nations can be enlightening, for those who don't have the time or energy or willingness, all they need to do is to watch and listen to Trump, and his fellow travelers.

Some were, some weren't.

Tojo?

What astounding ignorance, Comrade.

Pinochet?

What you Maoists do is use "fascist" as a substitute for "heretic."

As I said, you have zero grasp of the meaning. All enemies of the party are "fascists."

Words have meanings, Comrade. That Marxist academia attempted to recast fascism, a socialist economic system with autocratic dictatorship as "right wing" is simply an example of the big lie in action.

BUT that has failed now. Only leftists still buy into that utterly stupid lie.

If you want to know what Fascism is, read fucking Mussolini. If you want to be an ignorant prick, by all means continue to spew Maoist bullshit.

You do not yet understand the difference between Fascism and fascism - is English grammar alien to you?

 

[my2¢]

They dropped her under duress. That’s essentially a threat to speech and anyone who denies that is either stupid or lying.

I'd say she got Kaepernicked.

I don’t know that Ingraham protested her own free speech and I don’t remember any apology of any sort coming from kaepernick.

I haven't paid all that much attention to them either. All I know is that the principle is the same, "duress" as you put it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

awesome

lol

 

[rightwinger]

Laura ruined her own damn career. Laura and the rest of the right have been attacking these victims since day one.

They lack the tact and sense when talking about these kids. You criticize their stance but you also have to be a little sensitive to the fact they've gone through a traumatic experience and they are still very young.

Laura making fun of David because he got rejected from university is just plain tasteless and nasty.

So advertisers and the people have right to not want to be associated with such human vermin.

Yea, we have to ban everyone that doesn't parrot liberal ideology. There can only be one view expressed!

I try to stop doing business with companies that pull support for political reasons.

how's that working out....for the companies? Are they devastated?

In backing the rightwing media, sponsors are damned if they do damned if they don’t
They are attacked if they support the bizarre rantings of the right and damned if they drop their sponsorship
They will eventually just stay away

 

[Uncensored2008]

Again, you anti-civil rights clows trot out the same tired bullshit over and over. You get the shit kicked out of you, then whimper away.

You just fucking said anyone can buy a firearm at a gun show and not be subjected to a background screening by an unlicensed dealer. That’s what you call, kicking our ass. Exactly how senile are you, gramps?

DERP

Same lies from the same retards...

{
The “Gun Show Loophole” demagoguery demonizes these individual collectors and portrays them as the source of all of our troubles. What the gun control lobby wants to confuse the public into supporting is the enactment of laws that require background checks on private sales, transfers or loans of firearms.

Certainly, some individuals do come to gun shows to barter, trade, sell or buy firearms – but they are not dealers any more than those who meet at a gun range and choose to trade. If they were dealers, the ATF would force them to register as federal firearms licensees under existing law. And yes, ATF agents come to every gun show, and even flea markets and other such venues, looking for violations of these laws.

So what is the real purpose of the push to close the “gun show loophole”? Since there is no loophole, the purpose is to convince the public to agree to a law that subject ALL private sales, transfers, or loans of firearms to the background check requirement.

If such a law were in place, you could not loan a firearm to a friend for a weekend hunt, trade guns at the range or give your son a deer rifle without going to a federal firearm licensed dealer to conduct a background check. This extension of government into the private lives of gun owners is meant to cause inconvenience and thereby discourage the ownership of firearms. It will especially discourage the gifting and loaning of firearms so often used to encourage someone to join the shooting community.

What this will not do is slow down the acquisition of firearms by criminals. It is already illegal for even a private individual to transfer a firearm to a felon or other prohibited person.

Many people are unaware that studies show virtually all criminals obtain their firearms through black market transactions on the street. Just as gang members deal in drugs and other contraband, they trade and sell firearms, many of which have been stolen in the first place. These dealers in contraband care nothing about laws and will never conduct background checks. Thus these laws only burden the law abiding citizens with the proposed incursions on their Second Amendment rights.

Mass shootings and the Charleston tragedy are no exception. In a public statement the FBI Director admitted that it was a bureaucratic error that permitted the Charleston shooter to obtain a firearm. Improving the existing system under current law may have helped – but no new intrusions on State and Federal Constitutional rights are necessary. As for other mass shootings occurring across our country, the perpetrators commonly pass background checks when they buy firearms through licensed dealers, and we find many more instances where theft, rather than a private sale, is the source of firearms.}


The Gun Show Loophole Myth

Stop lying, ya loopy old fart. You already admitted there’s a loophole, even if you refuse to believe what you post...

However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.​

Retards and their straw man fallacies.

You're an idiot Li'l Kim.

I know reading is a bit much for you, so watch the videos I posted, you drooling retard.

You’re saying I should ignore what you post? Don’t you know what you post?

However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.​

I'm saying you are stupid and dishonest.

What did I post?

Moron.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You do not yet understand the difference between Fascism and fascism - is English grammar alien to you?

What a fucktard.

 

[Faun]

You just fucking said anyone can buy a firearm at a gun show and not be subjected to a background screening by an unlicensed dealer. That’s what you call, kicking our ass. Exactly how senile are you, gramps?

DERP

Same lies from the same retards...

{
The “Gun Show Loophole” demagoguery demonizes these individual collectors and portrays them as the source of all of our troubles. What the gun control lobby wants to confuse the public into supporting is the enactment of laws that require background checks on private sales, transfers or loans of firearms.

Certainly, some individuals do come to gun shows to barter, trade, sell or buy firearms – but they are not dealers any more than those who meet at a gun range and choose to trade. If they were dealers, the ATF would force them to register as federal firearms licensees under existing law. And yes, ATF agents come to every gun show, and even flea markets and other such venues, looking for violations of these laws.

So what is the real purpose of the push to close the “gun show loophole”? Since there is no loophole, the purpose is to convince the public to agree to a law that subject ALL private sales, transfers, or loans of firearms to the background check requirement.

If such a law were in place, you could not loan a firearm to a friend for a weekend hunt, trade guns at the range or give your son a deer rifle without going to a federal firearm licensed dealer to conduct a background check. This extension of government into the private lives of gun owners is meant to cause inconvenience and thereby discourage the ownership of firearms. It will especially discourage the gifting and loaning of firearms so often used to encourage someone to join the shooting community.

What this will not do is slow down the acquisition of firearms by criminals. It is already illegal for even a private individual to transfer a firearm to a felon or other prohibited person.

Many people are unaware that studies show virtually all criminals obtain their firearms through black market transactions on the street. Just as gang members deal in drugs and other contraband, they trade and sell firearms, many of which have been stolen in the first place. These dealers in contraband care nothing about laws and will never conduct background checks. Thus these laws only burden the law abiding citizens with the proposed incursions on their Second Amendment rights.

Mass shootings and the Charleston tragedy are no exception. In a public statement the FBI Director admitted that it was a bureaucratic error that permitted the Charleston shooter to obtain a firearm. Improving the existing system under current law may have helped – but no new intrusions on State and Federal Constitutional rights are necessary. As for other mass shootings occurring across our country, the perpetrators commonly pass background checks when they buy firearms through licensed dealers, and we find many more instances where theft, rather than a private sale, is the source of firearms.}


The Gun Show Loophole Myth

Stop lying, ya loopy old fart. You already admitted there’s a loophole, even if you refuse to believe what you post...

However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.​

Retards and their straw man fallacies.

You're an idiot Li'l Kim.

I know reading is a bit much for you, so watch the videos I posted, you drooling retard.

You’re saying I should ignore what you post? Don’t you know what you post?

However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.​

I'm saying you are stupid and dishonest.

What did I post?

Moron.

LOLOL

You don't know what you post and you're projecting that I'm the moron?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Wow, people are still talking about this little fraudster?

Roflmao

 

[Uncensored2008]

[LOLOL

You don't know what you post and you're projecting that I'm the moron?

You are a North Korean troll. The Straw Man is a big part of the bullshit you peddle. You assign arguments to the normals and then post talking points to refute what was not proffered.

You are dishonest and stupid, as everyone on every side of the aisles knows.

 

[Faun]

[LOLOL

You don't know what you post and you're projecting that I'm the moron?

You are a North Korean troll. The Straw Man is a big part of the bullshit you peddle. You assign arguments to the normals and then post talking points to refute what was not proffered.

You are dishonest and stupid, as everyone on every side of the aisles knows.

LOL

You make Dale Smith look normal.

 

[rightwinger]

[LOLOL

You don't know what you post and you're projecting that I'm the moron?

You are a North Korean troll. The Straw Man is a big part of the bullshit you peddle. You assign arguments to the normals and then post talking points to refute what was not proffered.

You are dishonest and stupid, as everyone on every side of the aisles knows.

Tell us about Pol Pot

 

[Uncensored2008]

[LOLOL

You don't know what you post and you're projecting that I'm the moron?

You are a North Korean troll. The Straw Man is a big part of the bullshit you peddle. You assign arguments to the normals and then post talking points to refute what was not proffered.

You are dishonest and stupid, as everyone on every side of the aisles knows.

LOL

You make Dale Smith look normal.

Thanks Fawn, Dale Smith is a great guy.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[LOLOL

You don't know what you post and you're projecting that I'm the moron?

You are a North Korean troll. The Straw Man is a big part of the bullshit you peddle. You assign arguments to the normals and then post talking points to refute what was not proffered.

You are dishonest and stupid, as everyone on every side of the aisles knows.

Tell us about Pol Pot

Tell me shitflinger, what IS the difference between the Khmer Rouge "childrens Red Guard" and the Parkland kids you openly Marxist democrats set loose in Washington DC? Looks to me as if you have leaned well from Pol Pot.

Do me a favor though, keep pimping these kids until November. Make sure America is well aware that your goal is to end not just the second Amendment, but all civil rights. Keep that "really lovely" lesbian young lady in the Castro dungarees with the Che Guevara patch front and center. It is absolutely the path back to power for you openly Marxist democrat.

I only have your best interests in mind...

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Leave it to idiots to say TRUMPSTERS hate hogg because he DOESN'T' like Trump . WHEN THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS IT IS HIM TRING TO TELL ADULTS GIVE UP THEIR 2ND AMENDMENT AS THIS ASSHOLE HAS NO CLUE WHAT LIFE IS EVEN ABOUT YET.......... HE'S A HYPOCRITE AS HIS OWN VIDEO PROVES HE'S A HYPOCRITE SAYING HE WILL SHOOT PPL SCREW THIS LITTLE BASTARD POS.

WE DON'T WANT TO LOSE WHAT MAKES OUR COUNTRY FREE THE RIGHT TO PROTECT OURSELVES...

Hypocrite Hogg @davidhogg111 Walked around talking about shooting people. When told to another friend what he did, they were not surprised. Hogg has accepted $$$ to push an agenda. Hey @IngrahamAngle don't apologize push BACK harder! @realDonaldTrump @LexiHunting @SailorsChristie

So shrill...so frightened...of HS students...

If pro gun control advocates didn't think these kids could accomplish anything then why are they so excited by all this? And if they do think these kids can accomplish something and if in fact they are are capable of accomplishing something, doesn't it make sense that pro 2nd Amendment people be concerned, high school kids or not?