Americans who own and carry guns make the country safer.....mass shooters choose democrat party gun free zones as their targets......so when Americans can legally carry guns, they keep mass shooters from attacking...this news of an increase in interest in Concealed carry of guns shows that Americans understand, the cops can't protect you.....
US interest in concealed carry permit training jumps by over 100 per cent after Parkland: ‘We’ve never seen a spike this big before’
The number of Americans interested in obtaining concealed carry permits to secretly bear arms in public has jumped dramatically since the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in February – with some states having seen as much as a 250 per cent increase in training requests for this type of permit.
In the 50 days since the Parkland, Florida shooting, companies and networks of firearm instructors that provide training for the permits in dozens of states have seen enquiries spike. One company said it had even received more requests for training than after the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.
Dear
2aguy
Let's unite on a campaign for #CRIME-FREE ZONES
That's more unifying and specific than gun free zones.
We can all benefit from living in communities where every resident
AGREES not to engage in, enable or commit crimes, right?
This is much better, don't you think, than arguing for gun free zones.
Some people can object and want guns, and that's not necessarily bad.
But if someone objects to a CRIME FREE ZONE and WANTS CRIME,
then that is clearly asking to enable and allow criminal actions or behavior!
Encourage your local Teacher and Police unions to have meetings
with your local City Council rep and Party Precinct Chair or Electoral College Rep.
Have teachers and police write up an optional ordinance,
similar to Rules of the Classroom, where Civic or Neighborhood Associations/HOA
can adapt these and each group of residents sign agreements
to follow laws and comply with authorities, not commit any crimes or abuses,
and if they are convicted they agree to comply with full disclosure and pay
all costs of their infractions including police/legal/prison costs otherwise charged to taxpayers.
And if they don't agree, they move to districts with different policies.
So we can have CRIME FREE ZONES by free choice and informed
consent of the residents, property owners and taxpayers per District.
If people want Sanctuary Cities and Gun free Zones, then organize
with likeminded people and fund and run these by consent of community members.
Let's not impose on each other's beliefs.
Give everyone equal freedom of association to organize likeminded communities
under the same beliefs and principles, and bring sanity back to our schools and districts.
Dear Emily,
The world is meant to be a crime free zone. Declaring any certain area a crime free zone means absolutely NOTHING to criminals.
Sometimes I wonder....
Dear
asaratis
Have you seen the difference in classrooms when the teacher ESTABLISHES agreement
among the participants to follow SET RULES they are taught, including the PROCESS
by which infractions will be managed?
In society, we wait until AFTER people commit crimes to "read them their rights."
I HAVE thought about this, and I'm not being flippant.
I am talking about taking the system that Virginia has for a citizenship test,
and expanding that for all states and districts to TEACH citizens the
laws, the policing procedures by going through training of these protocols WITH police,
learn the COSTS of infractions including policing, prosecution and incarceration and legal
costs, and REQUIRE citizens who want rights and privileges to
SIGN AGREEMENTS to pay costs for any and all infractions or
else agree to be DEPORTED.
Then everyone would have to live in communities where they trust each other to follow laws
and not to abuse power to falsely accuse each other.
Either you agree to follow laws or you don't live there.
I am serious.
If we let people get covered by taxpayers if they do wrong, there is no incentive to
teach, learn or change, to prevent or deter crime.
If you've ever seen meetings where people
1. did agree to the same rules and process
2. did not set up agreed rules before interacting
You can see the difference.
@asartis it is just common sense.
When you teach Math, you teach the rules and process of getting right answers,
and how to check and fix mistakes BEFORE you test people and expect them to
be responsible for knowing their Math.
If you don't teach people math, they are going to do it wrong and fail.
Why don't we teach people the laws
and what is the process if you have a grievance about an abuse?
What is the process if police are called to address a disruption or breach of the peace?
Why do we wait until people violate laws to teach them WHAT THEY ARE
and WHAT is the legal process of correcting problems so we don't make them worse???