David Brooks, Time for a civic uprising

Whites fail to realize that they chose racism. Thats whites on both sides. Harris destryed trump in their debte and made him run from another one. She was far better thn Trump. So then if the only person that could beat Trump was a white man with less qualifications than Harris which would have been every white man in the democratic primary, then whites voted for racism.

And these opinions here coming from Republicans are irrelevant because you'd be whining about a steal if Trump had lost.
Some day you’ll realize in order to vote for racism I’d have to actually care about you or what you think. I don’t, nobody else does either. You don’t even cross our minds when voting. I vote for what’s best for me and the country. If that’s not what you want or it gives you the sadz? Too fucking bad.
 
You MAGATS are going to learn the truth in what I have told you. Most Americans do not want what MAGA is trying to do. You will learn that more and more over the next 3.5 years. It could get very nasty for people wearing red MAGA hats.
Ah yes, more threats of violence from the violent leftists. Here's the deal, skippy. If you asshats start doing a bunch of violent shit you will end up being hunted for sport.
 
What a real conservative realizes. Not our "Conservatives". otherwise known as the cult of Trump;

You mean the brooks that regular quotes his favorite communists?

We aren't stupid, but you appear to be.
 
Thank you. That's what I said the other day. There are very few conservatives here. Anyone associated with or supporting MAGA is not a conservative.
Sure we are, we just aren't rino's, the problem is most people in congress who go along to get along, have been dragged left of center by the fringe left, to where they are not recognizable as actual conservatives, they are what liberals used to be, before you allowed your party to be hijacked by SJW's, with nothing but hate for anyone who disagrees, spare me your crying!
 

What a real conservative realizes. Not our "Conservatives". otherwise known as the cult of Trump;

David Brooks is the same percentage Conservative as I am Sub-Saharan African.

1000004226.webp
 
Lefties are so far off the freaking charts that it makes Canadian born liberal David Brooks look conservative.
 
The lack of intellectual rigor with which you approach these discussions makes me ask myself why I bother conversing with you. Your arguments are always reflexive and childish. Do you know any grown ups who could take your place?
At the least I thought it would take someone of extraordinary intellectual prowess to dupe them. As it turns out all it took was an addled, intellectually and morally bankrupt buffoon with extraordinary skills as a conman.
Berg you are both a gentleman and a scholar. You make it look so easy. I told you once and I will tell you again, I am "following" you.
 
Thank you. That's what I said the other day. There are very few conservatives here. Anyone associated with or supporting MAGA is not a conservative.
Tell us the conservatism we have had since Reagan. And he was not all that either. We had a couple years with a contract with America which was not conservative as much as just some common sense and manipulating numbers. Once social security ramped up and the great society was started with other social programs and the Cities and States were forced to put resources into it also from federal decree. The ties and states also started their own social agenda programs. The Progressive Socialist State was made part of the infrastructure. We live off of it now. DOGE was trying to cut some of the corruption and look what happened. Conservatism is mostly regional and local in the way people want.
 
The question is whether they're unknowingly doing it ("useful idiots") or whether this is what they really want (neofascism).

You can't ask them, obviously, so you can only wonder.
You are the useful idiot falling for the fascist yaksqueeze.

Now did that work out for you in November, Simp?
 
Brooks LOVED Barack Obama. :laughing0301:



"That first encounter is still vivid in Brooks's mind. "I remember distinctly an image of--we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant," Brooks says, "and I'm thinking, a) he's going to be president and b) he'll be a very good president." In the fall of 2006, two days after Obama's The Audacity of Hope hit bookstores, Brooks published a glowing Times column. The headline was "Run, Barack, Run."

These days, the center-right Brooks frequently seems more sympathetic toward Obama than the liberal Paul Krugman. He has written columns praising Obama's Afghanistan policy, education proposals, and economic team. Even on broad areas of disagreement--deficit spending, the sprawling stimulus bill, health care reform--Brooks tends to treat Obama and his administration with respect. "My overall view," Brooks told me, "is ninety-five percent of the decisions they make are good and intelligent. Whether I agree with them specifically, I think they're very serious and very good at what they do." It is an odd situation to say the least: David Brooks, prominent conservative, has become the most visible journalistic ally of arguably the most liberal president of his lifetime."

Did he steal that from a Nancy Drew book?
 
There was an interesting discussion I heard yesterday about the regime's attacks on institutions of higher learning like Harvard.


Click on the segment titled "Hayes: We are more powerful than ‘one petty, addled man’—and Trump knows it"

Brooks touched on some of the points being made in his article. The goal being to remove, in sweeping fashion, the cultural and institutional barriers preventing trump from amassing more power.
That bitch is an idiot.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom