catatonic
Member
- Jun 13, 2006
- 113
- 4
- 16
I'm pretty well feeling I'd like to move on to economics and someday politics/military.
As for Hobbit's assumption about evolving Nemoy from Where in the World is Carmen San Diego, I love his post 47 but I doubt the eyes/legs everywhere would occur with evolution in view of a UCLA find. UCLA found a gene allowing for the specific placement in legs from amphibians to reptiles. It says the upper legs must be in the same place relative to the body and establishes the 4 legs on a body form as coming from a gene.
Anyway here's my whole argument at all.
Proteins are CPU and software. DNA is memory to make the CPU.
The CPU operates on the memory as it's own software, modifying its creating new hardware capable of eliminating old hardware.
All the commands proteins can do on DNA to mutate it, the only way to avoid the usual microevolution, are like a very basic processor. Many basic processors have multiplication. This is much simpler. Change bit. Concatenate. Separate. Load. Store. Compare. Limited branch on compare. Reverse. Move right. Move left. Did I miss any? All of them are of the wrong order of complexity to get commented/useless memory to come into useful DNA and the ways to program the functioning memory into making a different useful novel protein. It's not really an issue of the software, but the instruction set in memory. This instruction set is too limited to program unless a protein causes a list of steps that has developed in such a way that the modifications of one of those steps fits the new possible hardware into a subclass of useful proteins. That's fine, and I'd love to study it more, but aren't there just one step a protein or group thereof causes and not a list of steps? If a list, I'll have to study more thoroughly to disprove the main argument.
And any evidence on the question for one complements as evidence equally against the other.
Whatever... I don't know if I'll keep commenting.
As for Hobbit's assumption about evolving Nemoy from Where in the World is Carmen San Diego, I love his post 47 but I doubt the eyes/legs everywhere would occur with evolution in view of a UCLA find. UCLA found a gene allowing for the specific placement in legs from amphibians to reptiles. It says the upper legs must be in the same place relative to the body and establishes the 4 legs on a body form as coming from a gene.
Anyway here's my whole argument at all.
Proteins are CPU and software. DNA is memory to make the CPU.
The CPU operates on the memory as it's own software, modifying its creating new hardware capable of eliminating old hardware.
All the commands proteins can do on DNA to mutate it, the only way to avoid the usual microevolution, are like a very basic processor. Many basic processors have multiplication. This is much simpler. Change bit. Concatenate. Separate. Load. Store. Compare. Limited branch on compare. Reverse. Move right. Move left. Did I miss any? All of them are of the wrong order of complexity to get commented/useless memory to come into useful DNA and the ways to program the functioning memory into making a different useful novel protein. It's not really an issue of the software, but the instruction set in memory. This instruction set is too limited to program unless a protein causes a list of steps that has developed in such a way that the modifications of one of those steps fits the new possible hardware into a subclass of useful proteins. That's fine, and I'd love to study it more, but aren't there just one step a protein or group thereof causes and not a list of steps? If a list, I'll have to study more thoroughly to disprove the main argument.
And any evidence on the question for one complements as evidence equally against the other.
Whatever... I don't know if I'll keep commenting.