Social Darwinism is not science, nor is it even remotely fact, and Darwinism is mostly about adaptation to new environments, not mutation into new species. It's always amazing how assorted faggots and deviants are always claiming to be 'rationalists' yet never accept that the evolution fictions are not science, just morons seeking to legitimize their mental illnesses via Xian bashing and Gramscian rubbish. Right wingers are no different than left wingers in their frothing lunacy and silly agendas, either.
Why is Darwinism taught in school as though it were proven fact?
It certainly isn't right wingers who own and operate the school system.
Darwin is taught in science classes since it it the best explanation of the natural world. The supernatural is taught in religion class.
Schools in this country are locally run so right wingers do own and operate school systems.
"Darwin is taught in science classes since it it the best explanation of the natural world."
Even well-known scientists admit it is made-up fable.
To correctly understand
why Darwinism is given the appreciation it truly does not deserve, consider this admission:
“We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs,” the geneticist Richard Lewontin remarked equably in
The New York Review of Books, “in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for
unsubstantiated just-so stories.” We are to put up with science’s unsubstantiated just-so stories because, Lewontin explains, “we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door!”
As per the OP,
Darwin is most valuable as an asset to Karl Marx.
You've been taught Darwin's theory because of neo-Marxist influence in the schools.
These academicians bring the bias of their politics and lay it at the feet of Charles Darwin.
The ‘scientists’ are atheistic Marxists, and Darwin serves their political views.
Stephen Gould, along with Lewontin, Levin,
Jonathan Beckwith,
Ruth Hubbard, and Herb Fox, founded an organization entitled "
Science for the People."
Wikipedia begins its discussion of this organization as follows: "
Science for the People is a leftwing organization that emerged from the antiwar culture of the United States in the 1970s." Harvard's E.O. Wilson labeled the organization "
American Marxists." Not insignificantly, the cover of its magazine contains the Communist clinched fist!
In other words, nearly everything Gould touched over his lifetime would force most neutral onlookers to the conclusion that he was indeed a Marxist and by implication an atheist.
And the goal of this fake science, Darwinism, is to disassociate Americans from religion.
And it has been, largely, successful.
