No they don't they have democrat supporting rhinos that were not selected per the rules by the republican leader of the House.No worries, they still got Republicans on that sub committee.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No they don't they have democrat supporting rhinos that were not selected per the rules by the republican leader of the House.No worries, they still got Republicans on that sub committee.
Where's your proof they informed Pelosi?So you deny that the FBI Informed the capitol police and Pelosi of the threat, Further you deny that for 3 days before the riot the police ask for NG and were refused and that Trump OFFERED 10000 National Guard on th day and was refused?
LOLOLNo they don't they have democrat supporting rhinos that were not selected per the rules by the republican leader of the House.
Yeah, no rightard would be stupid enough to do that.Who sends voicemail to D.C. cops except other D.C. Cops, friends and politicians? It's a freaking setup engineered by dirty tricks democrats.
Nope, if you can't prove your claim, you prove you made that up.LOL read them your self, They are public domain. Republicans pick their members and democrats pick their members.
They traded in their humanity for something.....not sure what they get out of it.And the chief of police of the Capitol Police Board was made aware. He was the one responsible. What the fuck is wrong with you?
Babbitt was lawfully and justifiably killed while committing an act of domestic terrorism and treason.
So...what would you do with that information? Make another lovely phone call?No, your regime is keeping the killer's identity secret.
She wasn't in the act of terrorism (No weapon, threats of attack) or Treason (No act or literature identified) when she was killed.
The only possible legitimate charges were trespassing and Vandalism.
LOLOLShe wasn't in the act of terrorism (No weapon, threats of attack) or Treason (No act or literature identified) when she was killed.
The only possible legitimate charges were trespassing and Vandalism.
The rightwing terrorists who attacked democracy should be thankful more of them weren't lawfully and justifiably killed.
LOL,LOLOL
They invaded restricted areas of the Capitol. That's a legitimate crime.
They delayed the election certification. That's a legitimate crime.
They assaulted federal police officers. That's a legitimate crime.
They threatened members of Congress. That's a legitimate crime.
What the fuck is wrong with you rightards?
She was leading a violent mob towards members of Congress to subvert the Constitution. She died a traitor.LOL,
I didn't realize Ashli Babbitt is all of them.....
Really I did allow for her as breaking and entering which is easy to prove, but terrorism? no as YOU and Dr. loveless didn't post any support for the absurd Terrorism charge against her.
She was unarmed and without indication of serious harm planned, no literature found.
I am NOT a republican, a long time Free thinking Independent.
She was leading a violent mob towards members of Congress to subvert the Constitution. She died a traitor.
Lateda....The recording is in the video in the article.
It's disturbing and disgusting.
D.C. police officer shares disturbing voicemail he received while testifying in front of Jan. 6 Select Committee
DC Police Officer Michael Fanone said this is not the first time people have expressed similar opinions to him.www.aol.com
He is a lying pos and oh btw, why would a undercover narcotics officer put on an uniform blowing his cover to play simple guard at a protest? This shit doesn't make sense---something else is going on here.The recording is in the video in the article.
It's disturbing and disgusting.
D.C. police officer shares disturbing voicemail he received while testifying in front of Jan. 6 Select Committee
DC Police Officer Michael Fanone said this is not the first time people have expressed similar opinions to him.www.aol.com
LOLOL
It matters not what you think of them. They're still Republicans.
Of course she was leading them. There was a violent mob behind her and she was the very first person to breach the police barricade. And it was the intent of the mob to "stop the steal." That was unconstitutional. And she was armed with a violent mob.No wasn't leading anyone, she was also unarmed and hadn't indicated her intent.
So you have no evidence of terrorism, thank you for your failure
So you say but now you're citing yourself, not actual House rules.not appointed by the lead republican as per House rules. Nor are there 5 of them as established by the subcommittee rules drawn up by the house.