Curious about your thoughts on Petraeus considered as Secretary of State?

[Ray From Cleveland]

That's not what Comey testified to. He stated to Congress that she did have classified emails on her server.

YES, she did have 7 or 8 email chains between her staff and then they forwarded them to Hillary, that were classified secret or top secret at the time they were sent to each other.... but, they were not top secret documents or anything like that...they were emails Hillary received from Syd Blumenthal, a friend of hers and it appears to be a valuable friend at that, because he was an informant... he sent all kinds of information that he felt could be important to her....and when she received these emails, she forwarded them to her aides/staffers to investigate what Syd was telling her and see if any of it can be or is true. I read that many of Syd's emails were fruitless with non-actionable information, but SOME of them would turn out to be accurate and give the State Dept information they did not know....

Well, the SOME of the emails that had information that her aides felt could be actionable information that they discovered, they forwarded back to Hillary to discuss what they found out, with her...

At the same time, our Intelligence community found out through their sources this SAME information that Syd had forwarded to Hillary that she was having her staffers check out. the State Dept did not know about the Intelligence community classification of this information and the intelligence community did not know about the State dept having this information.... at the time the emails were sent back to Hillary.

So YES, there was top level classified information in the 7 or 8 email chains, but it was NOT information they got from the IC or top secret server, but from a public source, syd blumenthal....

There can be an argument, that her staffers with top secret clearance investigating syd's emails, should have recognized the material was or should be classified to top secret perhaps, or for Hillary to recognize such, but she was above doing the actual classification, it should have been done by her aides before she ever got them forwarded to her, and marked properly....


She did not remove top secret classified material from it's proper place....which is how the law reads that you all claim she broke...there is no one that knows more about this case and Patraeus's case than Comey, he has all the clearance to see it all from both and has overseen each of those investigations, no one knows more than him... and Comey says what Patreaus did was MUCH WORSE than what Clinton did....AND he said there was no intent to break the law with the top secret info Hillary had, while with Patreaus committed obstruction of justice thru his intentional lies and passed on top secret documents to someone not authorized, INTENTIONALLY....

Hillary never did that...

What Hillary did do is destroy evidence while under subpoena and lied to Congress under oath multiple times. Nobody has their server bleach bitted to remove wedding invitations and yoga lessons.

NOPE!
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.

There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.

Why would you hand over personal shit that they have no right too!? Especially to a group out to destroy you . ?

If you set up a sever for both, your private and personal emails, the government does have the right to look at them. She lied several times to Congress about what was on that server including confidential and classified government mails.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That's not what Comey testified to. He stated to Congress that she did have classified emails on her server.

YES, she did have 7 or 8 email chains between her staff and then they forwarded them to Hillary, that were classified secret or top secret at the time they were sent to each other.... but, they were not top secret documents or anything like that...they were emails Hillary received from Syd Blumenthal, a friend of hers and it appears to be a valuable friend at that, because he was an informant... he sent all kinds of information that he felt could be important to her....and when she received these emails, she forwarded them to her aides/staffers to investigate what Syd was telling her and see if any of it can be or is true. I read that many of Syd's emails were fruitless with non-actionable information, but SOME of them would turn out to be accurate and give the State Dept information they did not know....

Well, the SOME of the emails that had information that her aides felt could be actionable information that they discovered, they forwarded back to Hillary to discuss what they found out, with her...

At the same time, our Intelligence community found out through their sources this SAME information that Syd had forwarded to Hillary that she was having her staffers check out. the State Dept did not know about the Intelligence community classification of this information and the intelligence community did not know about the State dept having this information.... at the time the emails were sent back to Hillary.

So YES, there was top level classified information in the 7 or 8 email chains, but it was NOT information they got from the IC or top secret server, but from a public source, syd blumenthal....

There can be an argument, that her staffers with top secret clearance investigating syd's emails, should have recognized the material was or should be classified to top secret perhaps, or for Hillary to recognize such, but she was above doing the actual classification, it should have been done by her aides before she ever got them forwarded to her, and marked properly....


She did not remove top secret classified material from it's proper place....which is how the law reads that you all claim she broke...there is no one that knows more about this case and Patraeus's case than Comey, he has all the clearance to see it all from both and has overseen each of those investigations, no one knows more than him... and Comey says what Patreaus did was MUCH WORSE than what Clinton did....AND he said there was no intent to break the law with the top secret info Hillary had, while with Patreaus committed obstruction of justice thru his intentional lies and passed on top secret documents to someone not authorized, INTENTIONALLY....

Hillary never did that...

What Hillary did do is destroy evidence while under subpoena and lied to Congress under oath multiple times. Nobody has their server bleach bitted to remove wedding invitations and yoga lessons.

NOPE!
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.

There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.

She only needed to hand over the govt emails for the National archives, and so Congress could then get from the archives, any of the ones relating to Benghazi. Congress had no jurisdiction to subpoena her private emails because they never had any probable cause to do such so a judge would issue the subpoena.... that's justice, my dear.... I would expect the same protection of Privacy from the government the constitution has given us....upon myself, if in the same situation.

govt can't go on "fishing expeditions" and just collect any of our private information any time they want to see if they can fish thru it and find something to pin us on for no good reason, for goodness sake! There has to be probable cause for wanting her private emails....but you know that...!!!

They subpoenaed all of them. She erased and bleach bitted what she didn't want the government to see. You don't go through that process unless it's evidence against you. There was probable cause. She used the same server for both private and government emails. The Constitution only protects you up to the point of an official search be it a warrant or subpoena. If the police suspect you of shooting somebody and get a warrant to search your home, you can't say "Ok, but you can only search these two rooms here. These other rooms contain my personal belongings!" Wrong. They search everything. They go through your personal belongings in search of evidence against you.

 

[Timmy]

YES, she did have 7 or 8 email chains between her staff and then they forwarded them to Hillary, that were classified secret or top secret at the time they were sent to each other.... but, they were not top secret documents or anything like that...they were emails Hillary received from Syd Blumenthal, a friend of hers and it appears to be a valuable friend at that, because he was an informant... he sent all kinds of information that he felt could be important to her....and when she received these emails, she forwarded them to her aides/staffers to investigate what Syd was telling her and see if any of it can be or is true. I read that many of Syd's emails were fruitless with non-actionable information, but SOME of them would turn out to be accurate and give the State Dept information they did not know....

Well, the SOME of the emails that had information that her aides felt could be actionable information that they discovered, they forwarded back to Hillary to discuss what they found out, with her...

At the same time, our Intelligence community found out through their sources this SAME information that Syd had forwarded to Hillary that she was having her staffers check out. the State Dept did not know about the Intelligence community classification of this information and the intelligence community did not know about the State dept having this information.... at the time the emails were sent back to Hillary.

So YES, there was top level classified information in the 7 or 8 email chains, but it was NOT information they got from the IC or top secret server, but from a public source, syd blumenthal....

There can be an argument, that her staffers with top secret clearance investigating syd's emails, should have recognized the material was or should be classified to top secret perhaps, or for Hillary to recognize such, but she was above doing the actual classification, it should have been done by her aides before she ever got them forwarded to her, and marked properly....


She did not remove top secret classified material from it's proper place....which is how the law reads that you all claim she broke...there is no one that knows more about this case and Patraeus's case than Comey, he has all the clearance to see it all from both and has overseen each of those investigations, no one knows more than him... and Comey says what Patreaus did was MUCH WORSE than what Clinton did....AND he said there was no intent to break the law with the top secret info Hillary had, while with Patreaus committed obstruction of justice thru his intentional lies and passed on top secret documents to someone not authorized, INTENTIONALLY....

Hillary never did that...

What Hillary did do is destroy evidence while under subpoena and lied to Congress under oath multiple times. Nobody has their server bleach bitted to remove wedding invitations and yoga lessons.

NOPE!
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.

There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.

Why would you hand over personal shit that they have no right too!? Especially to a group out to destroy you . ?

If you set up a sever for both, your private and personal emails, the government does have the right to look at them. She lied several times to Congress about what was on that server including confidential and classified government mails.

No they don't . A subpoena has to be specific . She did not have to turn over her personal shit.

We are talking 10s of thousands of emails . Because of the volume they had to use search terms . No one went over EVERY email one by one .

And shit can be classified for any dumb reason . One of the "classified " emails talked about a ny times story on the drone program. Since the drone program is technically a secret (that everyone knows about ) it was marked classified .

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

What Hillary did do is destroy evidence while under subpoena and lied to Congress under oath multiple times. Nobody has their server bleach bitted to remove wedding invitations and yoga lessons.

NOPE!
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.

There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.

Why would you hand over personal shit that they have no right too!? Especially to a group out to destroy you . ?

If you set up a sever for both, your private and personal emails, the government does have the right to look at them. She lied several times to Congress about what was on that server including confidential and classified government mails.

No they don't . A subpoena has to be specific . She did not have to turn over her personal shit.

We are talking 10s of thousands of emails . Because of the volume they had to use search terms . No one went over EVERY email one by one .

And shit can be classified for any dumb reason . One of the "classified " emails talked about a ny times story on the drone program. Since the drone program is technically a secret (that everyone knows about ) it was marked classified .

If she wasn't subjected to her personal emails being submitted, why did she bleach bit them? The assumption by the left is she only bleach bitted her personal emails. If you destroyed those emails, how would anybody know if they were personal or not?

That's why Congress subpoenaed all her emails; so they could sort through personal and government.

Of course part of her personal emails could have contained the shady dealings with the Clinton Foundation which of course she didn't want anybody to see. While they may not have been related to the email scam, it's more than likely those emails about foreign donations contained something that could incriminate her.

 

[Timmy]

NOPE!
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.

There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.

Why would you hand over personal shit that they have no right too!? Especially to a group out to destroy you . ?

If you set up a sever for both, your private and personal emails, the government does have the right to look at them. She lied several times to Congress about what was on that server including confidential and classified government mails.

No they don't . A subpoena has to be specific . She did not have to turn over her personal shit.

We are talking 10s of thousands of emails . Because of the volume they had to use search terms . No one went over EVERY email one by one .

And shit can be classified for any dumb reason . One of the "classified " emails talked about a ny times story on the drone program. Since the drone program is technically a secret (that everyone knows about ) it was marked classified .

If she wasn't subjected to her personal emails being submitted, why did she bleach bit them? The assumption by the left is she only bleach bitted her personal emails. If you destroyed those emails, how would anybody know if they were personal or not?

That's why Congress subpoenaed all her emails; so they could sort through personal and government.

Of course part of her personal emails could have contained the shady dealings with the Clinton Foundation which of course she didn't want anybody to see. While they may not have been related to the email scam, it's more than likely those emails about foreign donations contained something that could incriminate her.

Why wouldn't you !? The whole thing was a witch hunt .

Would you seriously trust those guys not to release your personal shit? God how many time was info leaked on the case .

Here's how you know it's all bullshit . They only focused on Hillary . Why not charge/investigate everyone who emailed her!? If someone emailed hill secrete stuff, they are the guilty ones .

 

[Care4all]

NOPE!
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.

There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.

Why would you hand over personal shit that they have no right too!? Especially to a group out to destroy you . ?

If you set up a sever for both, your private and personal emails, the government does have the right to look at them. She lied several times to Congress about what was on that server including confidential and classified government mails.

No they don't . A subpoena has to be specific . She did not have to turn over her personal shit.

We are talking 10s of thousands of emails . Because of the volume they had to use search terms . No one went over EVERY email one by one .

And shit can be classified for any dumb reason . One of the "classified " emails talked about a ny times story on the drone program. Since the drone program is technically a secret (that everyone knows about ) it was marked classified .

If she wasn't subjected to her personal emails being submitted, why did she bleach bit them? The assumption by the left is she only bleach bitted her personal emails. If you destroyed those emails, how would anybody know if they were personal or not?

That's why Congress subpoenaed all her emails; so they could sort through personal and government.

Of course part of her personal emails could have contained the shady dealings with the Clinton Foundation which of course she didn't want anybody to see. While they may not have been related to the email scam, it's more than likely those emails about foreign donations contained something that could incriminate her.

There ya go again, with your illegal fishing expedition....

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.

Why would you hand over personal shit that they have no right too!? Especially to a group out to destroy you . ?

If you set up a sever for both, your private and personal emails, the government does have the right to look at them. She lied several times to Congress about what was on that server including confidential and classified government mails.

No they don't . A subpoena has to be specific . She did not have to turn over her personal shit.

We are talking 10s of thousands of emails . Because of the volume they had to use search terms . No one went over EVERY email one by one .

And shit can be classified for any dumb reason . One of the "classified " emails talked about a ny times story on the drone program. Since the drone program is technically a secret (that everyone knows about ) it was marked classified .

If she wasn't subjected to her personal emails being submitted, why did she bleach bit them? The assumption by the left is she only bleach bitted her personal emails. If you destroyed those emails, how would anybody know if they were personal or not?

That's why Congress subpoenaed all her emails; so they could sort through personal and government.

Of course part of her personal emails could have contained the shady dealings with the Clinton Foundation which of course she didn't want anybody to see. While they may not have been related to the email scam, it's more than likely those emails about foreign donations contained something that could incriminate her.

Why wouldn't you !? The whole thing was a witch hunt .

Would you seriously trust those guys not to release your personal shit? God how many time was info leaked on the case .

Here's how you know it's all bullshit . They only focused on Hillary . Why not charge/investigate everyone who emailed her!? If someone emailed hill secrete stuff, they are the guilty ones .

Yes, they only focused on Hillary. She was the SOS. She's the one that went through the time and expense of setting up a private server. She's the one that previously lied to Congress under oath. Geeeze. If a Democrat politician with a knife was found next to a dead body, the first question you sheep would be asking is why are they trying to match the blood on the Democrats knife to the body.

 

[Timmy]

Why would you hand over personal shit that they have no right too!? Especially to a group out to destroy you . ?

If you set up a sever for both, your private and personal emails, the government does have the right to look at them. She lied several times to Congress about what was on that server including confidential and classified government mails.

No they don't . A subpoena has to be specific . She did not have to turn over her personal shit.

We are talking 10s of thousands of emails . Because of the volume they had to use search terms . No one went over EVERY email one by one .

And shit can be classified for any dumb reason . One of the "classified " emails talked about a ny times story on the drone program. Since the drone program is technically a secret (that everyone knows about ) it was marked classified .

If she wasn't subjected to her personal emails being submitted, why did she bleach bit them? The assumption by the left is she only bleach bitted her personal emails. If you destroyed those emails, how would anybody know if they were personal or not?

That's why Congress subpoenaed all her emails; so they could sort through personal and government.

Of course part of her personal emails could have contained the shady dealings with the Clinton Foundation which of course she didn't want anybody to see. While they may not have been related to the email scam, it's more than likely those emails about foreign donations contained something that could incriminate her.

Why wouldn't you !? The whole thing was a witch hunt .

Would you seriously trust those guys not to release your personal shit? God how many time was info leaked on the case .

Here's how you know it's all bullshit . They only focused on Hillary . Why not charge/investigate everyone who emailed her!? If someone emailed hill secrete stuff, they are the guilty ones .

Yes, they only focused on Hillary. She was the SOS. She's the one that went through the time and expense of setting up a private server. She's the one that previously lied to Congress under oath. Geeeze. If a Democrat politician with a knife was found next to a dead body, the first question you sheep would be asking is why are they trying to match the blood on the Democrats knife to the body.

She did not lie .

Yes she set up a server . It wasn't a secret. If u email to Hillary.com then you know where you are sending "secret " emails .

 

[koshergrl]

Democrats should love him since they wanted Hillary to run the whole freaking Country when she was accused of 100 times more serious violations than Petreaus pleaded guilty to.

The difference between what Petreaus did and what Hillary is that Petreaus was honest about his transgression, and he had to pay the penalty. Hillary? She got promoted to presidential nominee. Didn't cost her a dime.

Hillary has taken money from our enemies again and again in return for state secrets. She should be executed.

 

[percysunshine]

Do you think he will be able to get his sex / sending classified information scandal behind him, or does he not have a chance..?

David Petraeus shared classified info. Can he be secretary of state? - CNNPolitics.com


View attachment 100796

.
Well, keeping Kerry on the job would be moronic beyond belief. The entire mideast was set on fire under his watch. Ideally you would want someone who could push back on a President when the President did not understand some aspect of international relationships and the possible unintended consequences of a foreign policy move. I don't think Petreus is the right person to do that. There are more experienced diplomats available.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If you set up a sever for both, your private and personal emails, the government does have the right to look at them. She lied several times to Congress about what was on that server including confidential and classified government mails.

No they don't . A subpoena has to be specific . She did not have to turn over her personal shit.

We are talking 10s of thousands of emails . Because of the volume they had to use search terms . No one went over EVERY email one by one .

And shit can be classified for any dumb reason . One of the "classified " emails talked about a ny times story on the drone program. Since the drone program is technically a secret (that everyone knows about ) it was marked classified .

If she wasn't subjected to her personal emails being submitted, why did she bleach bit them? The assumption by the left is she only bleach bitted her personal emails. If you destroyed those emails, how would anybody know if they were personal or not?

That's why Congress subpoenaed all her emails; so they could sort through personal and government.

Of course part of her personal emails could have contained the shady dealings with the Clinton Foundation which of course she didn't want anybody to see. While they may not have been related to the email scam, it's more than likely those emails about foreign donations contained something that could incriminate her.

Why wouldn't you !? The whole thing was a witch hunt .

Would you seriously trust those guys not to release your personal shit? God how many time was info leaked on the case .

Here's how you know it's all bullshit . They only focused on Hillary . Why not charge/investigate everyone who emailed her!? If someone emailed hill secrete stuff, they are the guilty ones .

Yes, they only focused on Hillary. She was the SOS. She's the one that went through the time and expense of setting up a private server. She's the one that previously lied to Congress under oath. Geeeze. If a Democrat politician with a knife was found next to a dead body, the first question you sheep would be asking is why are they trying to match the blood on the Democrats knife to the body.

She did not lie .

Yes she set up a server . It wasn't a secret. If u email to Hillary.com then you know where you are sending "secret " emails .

She did not lie? Do I need to post the Comey video again?

 

[bendog]

Do you think he will be able to get his sex / sending classified information scandal behind him, or does he not have a chance..?

David Petraeus shared classified info. Can he be secretary of state? - CNNPolitics.com


View attachment 100796

Imo, generally a mil background is too narrow for SoS, which emphasized economics and diplomacy .. with the military option a last resort. The wandering general could probably be confirmed. (rudy, not a chance in hell) But there are better choices.

 

[owebo]

He's a closet anti-2A'er.......

 

[Timmy]

No they don't . A subpoena has to be specific . She did not have to turn over her personal shit.

We are talking 10s of thousands of emails . Because of the volume they had to use search terms . No one went over EVERY email one by one .

And shit can be classified for any dumb reason . One of the "classified " emails talked about a ny times story on the drone program. Since the drone program is technically a secret (that everyone knows about ) it was marked classified .

If she wasn't subjected to her personal emails being submitted, why did she bleach bit them? The assumption by the left is she only bleach bitted her personal emails. If you destroyed those emails, how would anybody know if they were personal or not?

That's why Congress subpoenaed all her emails; so they could sort through personal and government.

Of course part of her personal emails could have contained the shady dealings with the Clinton Foundation which of course she didn't want anybody to see. While they may not have been related to the email scam, it's more than likely those emails about foreign donations contained something that could incriminate her.

Why wouldn't you !? The whole thing was a witch hunt .

Would you seriously trust those guys not to release your personal shit? God how many time was info leaked on the case .

Here's how you know it's all bullshit . They only focused on Hillary . Why not charge/investigate everyone who emailed her!? If someone emailed hill secrete stuff, they are the guilty ones .

Yes, they only focused on Hillary. She was the SOS. She's the one that went through the time and expense of setting up a private server. She's the one that previously lied to Congress under oath. Geeeze. If a Democrat politician with a knife was found next to a dead body, the first question you sheep would be asking is why are they trying to match the blood on the Democrats knife to the body.

She did not lie .

Yes she set up a server . It wasn't a secret. If u email to Hillary.com then you know where you are sending "secret " emails .

She did not lie? Do I need to post the Comey video again?

Being mistaken is not lieing .

There's 10s of thousands of emails . To comply wh the subpoena Hillary used software to scan the emails for certain buzz words . Not 100% perfect . So yeah, out of a 30,000 there were a handful missed . And like a dozen of those 30k were found to be classified .

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If she wasn't subjected to her personal emails being submitted, why did she bleach bit them? The assumption by the left is she only bleach bitted her personal emails. If you destroyed those emails, how would anybody know if they were personal or not?

That's why Congress subpoenaed all her emails; so they could sort through personal and government.

Of course part of her personal emails could have contained the shady dealings with the Clinton Foundation which of course she didn't want anybody to see. While they may not have been related to the email scam, it's more than likely those emails about foreign donations contained something that could incriminate her.

Why wouldn't you !? The whole thing was a witch hunt .

Would you seriously trust those guys not to release your personal shit? God how many time was info leaked on the case .

Here's how you know it's all bullshit . They only focused on Hillary . Why not charge/investigate everyone who emailed her!? If someone emailed hill secrete stuff, they are the guilty ones .

Yes, they only focused on Hillary. She was the SOS. She's the one that went through the time and expense of setting up a private server. She's the one that previously lied to Congress under oath. Geeeze. If a Democrat politician with a knife was found next to a dead body, the first question you sheep would be asking is why are they trying to match the blood on the Democrats knife to the body.

She did not lie .

Yes she set up a server . It wasn't a secret. If u email to Hillary.com then you know where you are sending "secret " emails .

She did not lie? Do I need to post the Comey video again?

Being mistaken is not lieing .

There's 10s of thousands of emails . To comply wh the subpoena Hillary used software to scan the emails for certain buzz words . Not 100% perfect . So yeah, out of a 30,000 there were a handful missed . And like a dozen of those 30k were found to be classified .

Being mistaken is not lying? Why do you liberals believe that crap?

You liberals have different sets of words than we do, don't you?

When a Republican officers tax breaks or subsidies, it's taking care of their rich buddies. When a Democrat does the same, it's making an investment in America.

When a Republican is caught not speaking the truth, the Republican is a liar. When Democrats do the same, they "misspoke."

When a Republican switches positions on an issue, he's a flip-flopper. When Democrats do the same, they "evolved."

Folks, liberals have two sets of rules: one set for them, and another set for the rest of us."
Rush Limbaugh

 

[Desperado]

Petraeus should not even be in consideration. He was a General that had put his political ambitions before anything else. It would be an embarrassment for him to get the position

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Petraeus should not even be in consideration. He was a General that had put his political ambitions before anything else. It would be an embarrassment for him to get the position

Yeah, what are these people thinking? How could he ever hold a candle to Hillary (Benghazi was because of a video) Clinton?

 

[Lewdog]

Are people still using Hillary to defend him? When the fuck you going to let it go and just hold the person that is being talked about accountable? This isn't fucking elementary school where you get caught doing something by the teacher and then point the finger at someone else and say, "BUT THEY DID IT TOO!"

Grow the fuck up and be an adult and learn about personal accountability.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

YES, she did have 7 or 8 email chains between her staff and then they forwarded them to Hillary, that were classified secret or top secret at the time they were sent to each other.... but, they were not top secret documents or anything like that...they were emails Hillary received from Syd Blumenthal, a friend of hers and it appears to be a valuable friend at that, because he was an informant... he sent all kinds of information that he felt could be important to her....and when she received these emails, she forwarded them to her aides/staffers to investigate what Syd was telling her and see if any of it can be or is true. I read that many of Syd's emails were fruitless with non-actionable information, but SOME of them would turn out to be accurate and give the State Dept information they did not know....

Well, the SOME of the emails that had information that her aides felt could be actionable information that they discovered, they forwarded back to Hillary to discuss what they found out, with her...

At the same time, our Intelligence community found out through their sources this SAME information that Syd had forwarded to Hillary that she was having her staffers check out. the State Dept did not know about the Intelligence community classification of this information and the intelligence community did not know about the State dept having this information.... at the time the emails were sent back to Hillary.

So YES, there was top level classified information in the 7 or 8 email chains, but it was NOT information they got from the IC or top secret server, but from a public source, syd blumenthal....

There can be an argument, that her staffers with top secret clearance investigating syd's emails, should have recognized the material was or should be classified to top secret perhaps, or for Hillary to recognize such, but she was above doing the actual classification, it should have been done by her aides before she ever got them forwarded to her, and marked properly....


She did not remove top secret classified material from it's proper place....which is how the law reads that you all claim she broke...there is no one that knows more about this case and Patraeus's case than Comey, he has all the clearance to see it all from both and has overseen each of those investigations, no one knows more than him... and Comey says what Patreaus did was MUCH WORSE than what Clinton did....AND he said there was no intent to break the law with the top secret info Hillary had, while with Patreaus committed obstruction of justice thru his intentional lies and passed on top secret documents to someone not authorized, INTENTIONALLY....

Hillary never did that...

What Hillary did do is destroy evidence while under subpoena and lied to Congress under oath multiple times. Nobody has their server bleach bitted to remove wedding invitations and yoga lessons.

NOPE!
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.

There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.

Why would you hand over personal shit that they have no right too!? Especially to a group out to destroy you . ?

If you set up a sever for both, your private and personal emails, the government does have the right to look at them. She lied several times to Congress about what was on that server including confidential and classified government mails.

No, they don't.

 

[Political Junky]