Crying Wolf on Impeachment. The whole affair was a series of major fouls. The best outcome is.....

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,856
400
....a speedy acquittal!!!

The impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump is coming down to one big question: Will Democrats, by crying wolf, drown out the more legitimate Republican cry of foul?

“Foul” has served as the GOP’s most powerful and honest argument from the first days of these impeachment maneuverings. Democrats broke every standard of due process, transparency and fairness in their House investigation, making a mockery of their constitutional duty.

They hid the identity of the original accuser, denying Republicans and the country the ability to judge his motives. They held secret depositions, barring more than three-quarters of House members, as well as the press and the American public. They called 18 witnesses, but blocked the president from calling any in his defense. The White House legal team was excluded from the proceedings—prohibited from cross-examining witnesses, denied the ability to introduce any evidence that spoke to the central question of the president’s focus on Ukrainian corruption.

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff secretly obtained and published the communications records of the president’s private attorney, a member of Congress and a reporter. Democrats withdrew their court challenge to compel a key witness, depriving the White House of the ability to defend its executive-privilege claim in court. And the legitimacy of the first portion of the House inquiry—including numerous subpoenas—is in doubt, since it was conducted before the House voted to open it.

Democrats approved two articles of impeachment that failed to identify a crime. Senators are instead asked to render verdicts on a vague “abuse of power” claim and on a “obstruction of Congress” charge that is the result of the House’s own decision not to litigate its demand for testimony. Those articles were passed by a partisan vote with no serious expectation of conviction, simply to make a statement

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...

------------

Let's face it folk, this is about the BILLIONS OF DOLLARS THE DEMONRATS HAVE BEEN GRAFTING FOR DECADES NOW, along with a good portion of RINOS, that has come to light from the FUCK UP of Nanzi Pelosi, and the radical minorities that have taken over the Party of INFANTICIDE!....Face it. the left has NOTHING that can compete with Trump's economy. His foreign policy (WHICH CUTS OFF A LARGE PORTION OF THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS KICKBACK MONEY!) his RAISING the incomes of the poor and middle class, and so many other factors....If the MSM would only report factual news. the left would be a dead issue....but now even that fact has been exposed, there will never be a going back UNLESS THE LEFT, is able to IMPORT immigrants and promise and provide them with FREE SHIT that takes away from legal American citizens and OUR CHILDREN...THINK ABOUT IT!
 
I'm not sure how this will play out, but if it is rational (not optimistic), the Senate will vote on, "Even if everything alleged about the President's actions and motivations is TRUE, does that warrant the President's removal from office?"

Yes or No.

This question obviates the purported need for witnesses. Even if Bolton (or anyone else) corroborates EVERYTHING, it is still a bullshit case, not worthy of impeachment. Or not.

What say yins?
 
I'm not sure how this will play out, but if it is rational (not optimistic), the Senate will vote on, "Even if everything alleged about the President's actions and motivations is TRUE, does that warrant the President's removal from office?"

Yes or No.

This question obviates the purported need for witnesses. Even if Bolton (or anyone else) corroborates EVERYTHING, it is still a bullshit case, not worthy of impeachment. Or not.

What say yins?
Of course not..a PHONE CALL WHERE THE SUPPOSED VICTIM SAYS HE WAS NEVER PRESSUREF?...Only the very sick of the left believes that when they do NOTHING ABOUT....
Nj1UFY1_d.jpg

Biden-threat-ve
 

Forum List

Back
Top