Criminalizing scientism

[Midnight FM]

This isn't the same as criminalizing science, but I can see some benefits to criminalizing "scientism".

Basically, saying that something is true simply because "science says so", or saying that something isn't true simply because "science doesn't say so" should be criminalized. It is, epistemologically speaking, pure misinformation and regressive nonsense which inhibits freedom of thought.

 

[JGalt]

This isn't the same as criminalizing science, but I can see some benefits to criminalizing "scientism".

Basically, saying that something is true simply because "science says so", or saying that something isn't true simply because "science doesn't say so" should be criminalized. It is, epistemologically speaking, pure misinformation and regressive nonsense which inhibits freedom of thought.

You're still free to think anything you want to, even if I say "Science says men can't give birth."

 

[Marener]

You're still free to think anything you want to, even if I say "Science says men can't give birth."

We let people say a virgin can give birth, and you guys don’t have a problem with that.

 

[marvin martian]

We let people say a virgin can give birth, and you guys don’t have a problem with that.

Your brand of "science" killed millions of people.

 

[Marener]

Your brand of "science" killed millions of people.

Nope.

Report: COVID-19 vaccines saved US $1.15 trillion, 3 million lives

COVID-19 vaccines prevented more than 18.5 million US hospitalizations and 3.2 million deaths, according to new estimates.

www.cidrap.umn.edu

 

[Anomalism]

This isn't the same as criminalizing science, but I can see some benefits to criminalizing "scientism".

Basically, saying that something is true simply because "science says so", or saying that something isn't true simply because "science doesn't say so" should be criminalized. It is, epistemologically speaking, pure misinformation and regressive nonsense which inhibits freedom of thought.

Thought police?

 

[Stryder50]

We let people say a virgin can give birth, and you guys don’t have a problem with that.

If you are referring to the reported mother of Jesus Christ;
1) Who said, with proof, that she was a "virgin" ?
2) Use of the term "virgin" in the above context could mean no sexual relations with human males. But doesn't rule out sexual relations with non-human males (other humanoids )

 

[Stryder50]

This isn't the same as criminalizing science, but I can see some benefits to criminalizing "scientism".

Basically, saying that something is true simply because "science says so", or saying that something isn't true simply because "science doesn't say so" should be criminalized. It is, epistemologically speaking, pure misinformation and regressive nonsense which inhibits freedom of thought.

Your fascist inclinations aside for the moment, there is an irony and illogical to this post.

You want to encourage "freedom of thought" by restricting what can be thought about.

 

[Oddball]

This isn't the same as criminalizing science, but I can see some benefits to criminalizing "scientism".

Basically, saying that something is true simply because "science says so", or saying that something isn't true simply because "science doesn't say so" should be criminalized. It is, epistemologically speaking, pure misinformation and regressive nonsense which inhibits freedom of thought.

I've detected a pattern here: you want to criminalize/outlaw a lot of shit.

Maybe China or North Korea would be a better fit for you.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Your brand of "science" killed millions of people.

View attachment 1148285

Fumes Fumigate

Especially by not recognizing that auto emissions are antiseptic. They stopped all pandemics for a hundred years until the "Clean" Air hoax.

 

[Hafar1014]

This isn't the same as criminalizing science, but I can see some benefits to criminalizing "scientism".

Basically, saying that something is true simply because "science says so", or saying that something isn't true simply because "science doesn't say so" should be criminalized. It is, epistemologically speaking, pure misinformation and regressive nonsense which inhibits freedom of thought.

You have a first amendment problem

 

[Doc7505]

Thought police?

~~~~~~
Hmm....., Didn't Joey B try to impose the Ministry of Truth and Thought on America in 2022?
Didn't go to well in the USA, did it?

Read more:

Joe Biden's Disinformation Board Likened to Orwell's 'Ministry of Truth'​

Joe Biden's Disinformation Board Likened to Orwell's 'Ministry of Truth'

The president's recently created bureau has been compared to a department from George Orwell's dystopian classic "1984."

www.newsweek.com