The argument was made that there are "different punishments for the same crime" depending on if the perpetrator is a Muslim or an unbeliever. Do you have any evidence that a Muslim would not be punished for repeatedly slandering and abusing Rasul Allah (SAWS)?
Would the muslim be allowed to defend himself?
"Unbelievers" are not allowed that basic instinct. They are not allowed to defend themselves in front of the "believers".
Prove it using scripture.
You "say" that you are interested in facts. I have asked you to demonstrate where this works.
I will not play the scripture game with you
#1 I do not know enough about the scripture to discuss it
#2 The part that I have read is full of inuendos, and false statements, that slightly resembles the Bible, but ARE different
Why would I use something that I do not believe?
If you cannot show where Shari'ah law has worked, according to you, not one government system in thirteen hundred years, I feel the "facts" demonstrate, not only does it NOT WORK, there is no muslim country with muslim leaders that WANT it to be used.
As for those that do not want ShariÂ’ah, there is information being smuggled out of Iran and Afganistan about the abuses and cries for help. They are largely ignored by the rest of the world, because the brutality of islam hides behind the spirituality of its descent believers.
ShariÂ’ah is a myth, to keep "believers" under the control of corrupt governments. To "export" it, would only make other countries the same as the countries in the ME. If you follow where islam has grown in numbers, you see a decrease in freedom, and people living in fear. Why would you want that here? Honestly, please answer the question. You cannot make it the mythological society from the 600s. You can only make a country like:
Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%
Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%
Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%
Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%
Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%
Everyone of these nations has a large muslim population. Which one has been made better by ShariÂ’ah?
According to you, none of them use ShariÂ’ah as the national government; doesnÂ’t that tell you something that if a country is 100 % muslim and ShariÂ’ah is not being used, maybe it just DOESNÂ’T WORK.
Do you see a country listed that the USA should use as a model, to go in that direction? Do you see a country there that is known for its human rights, personal freedom, technology, medical care, generosity, integrity?
If you donÂ’t and you still claim to want ShariÂ’ah law in the USA, you are being false to yourself and to others.
It is your turn, lay out the “FACTS”. Show us how Shari’ah can possibly work to improve anyone’s life (beside the brutal thugs that enforce it, the PIPs). Show us how it has improved anything, anywhere it has been implemented (and that doesn’t mean changing one brutal system into a “slightly” less brutal system), real improvements that can be shown as FACTS.
